IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v66y2018icp79-88.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecological content validation of the Information Assessment Method for parents (IAM-parent): A mixed methods study

Author

Listed:
  • Bujold, M.
  • El Sherif, R.
  • Bush, P.L.
  • Johnson-Lafleur, J.
  • Doray, G.
  • Pluye, P.

Abstract

This mixed methods study content validated the Information Assessment Method for parents (IAM-parent) that allows users to systematically rate and comment on online parenting information. Quantitative data and results: 22,407 IAM ratings were collected; of the initial 32 items, descriptive statistics showed that 10 had low relevance. Qualitative data and results: IAM-based comments were collected, and 20 IAM users were interviewed (maximum variation sample); the qualitative data analysis assessed the representativeness of IAM items, and identified items with problematic wording. Researchers, the program director, and Web editors integrated quantitative and qualitative results, which led to a shorter and clearer IAM-parent.

Suggested Citation

  • Bujold, M. & El Sherif, R. & Bush, P.L. & Johnson-Lafleur, J. & Doray, G. & Pluye, P., 2018. "Ecological content validation of the Information Assessment Method for parents (IAM-parent): A mixed methods study," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 79-88.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:66:y:2018:i:c:p:79-88
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.09.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718917300174
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.09.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Williams, Izaak L. & O’Donnell, Clifford R., 2014. "Web-based tracking methods in longitudinal studies," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 82-89.
    2. David Li Tang & France Bouthillier & Pierre Pluye & Roland Grad & Carol Repchinsky, 2015. "The value of user feedback: Healthcare professionals' comments to the health information provider," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(2), pages 377-391, February.
    3. Aguado Loi, Claudia X. & Alfonso, Moya L. & Chan, Isabella & Anderson, Kelsey & Tyson, Dinorah (Dina) Martinez & Gonzales, Junius & Corvin, Jaime, 2017. "Application of mixed-methods design in community-engaged research: Lessons learned from an evidence-based intervention for Latinos with chronic illness and minor depression," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 29-38.
    4. Michael S. Garver, 2001. "Listening to Customers," American Journal of Business, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 16(2), pages 41-54.
    5. Materia, Frank T. & Miller, Elizabeth A. & Runion, Megan C. & Chesnut, Ryan P. & Irvin, Jamie B. & Richardson, Cameron B. & Perkins, Daniel F., 2016. "Let’s get technical: Enhancing program evaluation through the use and integration of internet and mobile technologies," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 31-42.
    6. Phillips, Kaye & Müller-Clemm, Werner & Ysselstein, Margaretha & Sachs, Jonathan, 2013. "Evaluating health inequity interventions: Applying a contextual (external) validity framework to programs funded by the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 198-203.
    7. Goldberg, Jessica & Bumgarner, Erin & Jacobs, Francine, 2016. "Measuring program- and individual-level fidelity in a home visiting program for adolescent parents," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 163-173.
    8. Bute, Jennifer J. & Comer, Karen & Lauten, Kathryn M. & Sanematsu, Helen Y. & Moore, Courtney M. & Lynch, Dustin & Chumbler, Neale R., 2014. "Implementation of a journal prototype for pregnant and parenting adolescents," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 122-130.
    9. Pierre Pluye & Roland Grad & Carol Repchinsky & Barbara Jovaisas & Janique Johnson-Lafleur & Marie-Eve Carrier & Vera Granikov & Barbara Farrell & Charo Rodriguez & Gillian Bartlett & Carmen Loiselle , 2013. "Four levels of outcomes of information-seeking: A mixed methods study in primary health care," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(1), pages 108-125, January.
    10. Cerezo, M. Angeles & Dasi, Carmen & Ruiz, Juan Carlos, 2013. "Supporting parenting of infants: Evaluating outcomes for parents and children in a community-based program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 12-20.
    11. Wynter, Karen & Hammarberg, Karin & Sartore, Gina-Maree & Cann, Warren & Fisher, Jane, 2015. "Brief online surveys to monitor and evaluate facilitated peer support groups for caregivers of children with special needs," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 70-75.
    12. Burkhardt, Jason T. & Schröter, Daniela C. & Magura, Stephen & Means, Stephanie N. & Coryn, Chris L.S., 2015. "An overview of evidence-based program registers (EBPRs) for behavioral health," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 92-99.
    13. Roland Grad & Pierre Pluye & Vera Granikov & Janique Johnson-Lafleur & Michael Shulha & Soumya Bindiganavile Sridhar & Jonathan L. Moscovici & Gillian Bartlett & Alain C. Vandal & Bernard Marlow & Lor, 2011. "Physicians' assessment of the value of clinical information: Operationalization of a theoretical model," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(10), pages 1884-1891, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. V. Srinivasan & G. Shainesh & Anand K. Sharma, 2015. "An approach to prioritize customer-based, cost-effective service enhancements," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(14), pages 747-762, October.
    2. Rosa M. Trenado & M. Angeles Cerezo & Purificación Sierra-García & Gemma Pons-Salvador, 2021. "Sequential coding of maternal sensitivity: application of nonlinear dynamic analyses and reliability," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 827-844, June.
    3. McGuinness, Seamus & Bergin, Adele & Whelan, Adele, 2016. "An Exploration of (Area-based) Social Inclusion and Community Development Training Programmes in Ireland," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number RS54.
    4. Teasdale, Rebecca M. & Strasser, Mikayla & Moore, Ceily & Graham, Kara E., 2023. "Evaluative criteria in practice: Findings from an analysis of evaluations published in Evaluation and Program Planning," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    5. Pierre Pluye & Roland Grad & Carol Repchinsky & Barbara Jovaisas & Janique Johnson-Lafleur & Marie-Eve Carrier & Vera Granikov & Barbara Farrell & Charo Rodriguez & Gillian Bartlett & Carmen Loiselle , 2013. "Four levels of outcomes of information-seeking: A mixed methods study in primary health care," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(1), pages 108-125, January.
    6. Zack, Melissa K. & Karre, Jennifer K. & Olson, Jonathan & Perkins, Daniel F., 2019. "Similarities and differences in program registers: A case study," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Thomas E. Strayer & Laura E. Balis & NithyaPriya S. Ramalingam & Samantha M. Harden, 2022. "Dissemination in Extension: Health Specialists’ Information Sources and Channels for Health Promotion Programming," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Oliver, Jason A. & Lang, Jason M., 2018. "Barriers and consultation needs regarding implementation of evidence-based treatment in community agencies," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 368-377.
    9. Magura, Stephen & Lee-Easton, Miranda J. & Abu-Obaid, Ruqayyah N. & Landsverk, John & DeCamp, Whitney & Rolls-Reutz, Jennifer & Moore, Kristin & Firpo-Triplett, Regina & Buckley, Pamela R. & Stout, El, 2023. "The influence of evidence-based program registry websites for dissemination of evidence-based interventions in behavioral healthcare," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    10. McGuinness, Seamus & Bergin, Adele & Whelan, Adele, 2017. "Making centralised data work for community development: an exploration of area-based training programmes in a unified framework," Papers WP555, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    11. Pelucha, Martin & Kveton, Viktor & Potluka, Oto, 2019. "Using mixed method approach in measuring effects of training in firms: Case study of the European Social Fund support," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 146-155.
    12. Isto Huvila, 2020. "Use-Oriented Information and Knowledge Management: Information Production and Use Practices as an Element of the Value and Impact of Information," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(04), pages 1-25, January.
    13. Mersky, Joshua P. & Janczewski, Colleen E. & Plummer Lee, ChienTi & Yasin, Tajammal, 2022. "Impact of home visiting programs on parenting stress in low-income women: Findings from a community-based trial at an urban health department," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    14. Hickey, Grainne & McGilloway, Sinead & O'Brien, Morgan & Leckey, Yvonne & Devlin, Maurice & Donnelly, Michael, 2018. "Strengthening stakeholder buy-in and engagement for successful exploration and installation: A case study of the development of an area-wide, evidence-based prevention and early intervention strategy," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 185-195.
    15. Colleen O’Brien Cherry & Neale Chumbler & Jennifer Bute & Amber Huff, 2015. "Building a “Better Lifeâ€," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(1), pages 21582440155, February.
    16. Iudici, Antonio & Gagliardo Corsi, Agnese, 2017. "Evaluation in the field of social services for minors: Measuring the efficacy of interventions in the Italian service for health protection and promotion," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 160-168.
    17. Axford, Nick & Morpeth, Louise & Bjornstad, Gretchen & Hobbs, Tim & Berry, Vashti, 2022. "“What works” registries of interventions to improve child and youth psychosocial outcomes: A critical appraisal," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    18. T’Pring R. Westbrook & Sarah A. Avellar & Neil Seftor, 2017. "Reviewing the Reviews: Examining Similarities and Differences Between Federally Funded Evidence Reviews," Evaluation Review, , vol. 41(3), pages 183-211, June.
    19. Carr, E. Summerson & Obertino-Norwood, Hannah, 2022. "Legitimizing evidence: The trans-institutional life of evidence-based practice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    20. Seamus McGuinness & Adele Bergin & Adele Whelan, 2017. "Using monitoring data to assess community development: Evidence from Ireland," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 32(6), pages 539-564, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:66:y:2018:i:c:p:79-88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.