IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v60y2017icp91-99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interaction dynamics: The case of the water sector skills plan in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Moyo, Laurane
  • Wehn, Uta

Abstract

Despite extensive and continuous efforts to strengthen the capacity of people, organizations and institutions, there is evidence of an increasing gap between the existing and required capacities within the water sector. Consensus seems to be emerging regarding the need for national strategies to improve water sector capacity development. This paper analyses the dynamics of actors’ interactions and their characteristics (motivation, cognition and power) during the formulation and implementation of a specific capacity development strategy, namely the Water Sector Skills Plan (SSP) in South Africa. Based on the Contextual Interactive Theory and empirical findings, our analysis indicates slow progression and challenges with implementing the SSP, mainly due to the lack of consultation with key stakeholders during the formulation stage, a lack of data sharing among the target group (the Sector Education Training Authorities), and a lack of capacities within the key implementing organizations. These policy dynamics need to be taken into account when advocating for national capacity development strategies as a solution for challenges with water sector capacity development. The paper proposes the recommendations that are of relevance for the SSP as well as similar initiatives in other countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Moyo, Laurane & Wehn, Uta, 2017. "Interaction dynamics: The case of the water sector skills plan in South Africa," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 91-99.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:60:y:2017:i:c:p:91-99
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.08.021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718915300707
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.08.021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. José Plaza-Úbeda & Jerónimo Burgos-Jiménez & Eva Carmona-Moreno, 2010. "Measuring Stakeholder Integration: Knowledge, Interaction and Adaptational Behavior Dimensions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 93(3), pages 419-442, May.
    2. Reza Daniels, 2007. "Skills Shortages in South Africa: A Literature Review," Working Papers 07121, University of Cape Town, Development Policy Research Unit.
    3. Wang, Dan & Ap, John, 2013. "Factors affecting tourism policy implementation: A conceptual framework and a case study in China," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 221-233.
    4. Mugabi, Josses & Kayaga, Sam & Njiru, Cyrus, 2007. "Strategic planning for water utilities in developing countries," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 1-8, March.
    5. Palumbo, Dennis J. & Hallett, Michael A., 1993. "Conflict versus consensus models in policy evaluation and implementation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 11-23.
    6. Walker, Warren E. & Rahman, S. Adnan & Cave, Jonathan, 2001. "Adaptive policies, policy analysis, and policy-making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(2), pages 282-289, January.
    7. Brett Wertz & Aylara Odekova & Mike Seaman, 2011. "Building capacity with demand-driven partnerships: a case study of Partners for Water and Sanitation," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 19-33, February.
    8. Bas Arts & Jan Tatenhove, 2004. "Policy and power: A conceptual framework between the ‘old’ and ‘new’ policy idioms," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 37(3), pages 339-356, December.
    9. Kotzebue, Julia R. & Bressers, Hans Th.A. & Yousif, Charles, 2010. "Spatial misfits in a multi-level renewable energy policy implementation process on the Small Island State of Malta," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 5967-5976, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Januar, Rizky & Sari, Eli Nur Nirmala & Putra, Surahman, 2021. "Dynamics of local governance: The case of peatland restoration in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Krott, Max & Bader, Axel & Schusser, Carsten & Devkota, Rosan & Maryudi, Ahmad & Giessen, Lukas & Aurenhammer, Helene, 2014. "Actor-centred power: The driving force in decentralised community based forest governance," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 34-42.
    2. Jonathan Crush, 2014. "Southern hub: the globalization of migration to South Africa," Chapters, in: Robert E.B. Lucas (ed.), International Handbook on Migration and Economic Development, chapter 8, pages 211-240, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Pirotta, F.J.C. & Ferreira, E.C. & Bernardo, C.A., 2013. "Energy recovery and impact on land use of Maltese municipal solid waste incineration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 1-11.
    4. Reichardt, Kristin & Rogge, Karoline S. & Negro, Simona, 2015. "Unpacking the policy processes for addressing systemic problems: The case of the technological innovation system of offshore wind in Germany," Working Papers "Sustainability and Innovation" S2/2015, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    5. Kasper Ampe & Erik Paredis & Lotte Asveld & Patricia Osseweijer & Thomas Block, 2021. "Power struggles in policy feedback processes: incremental steps towards a circular economy within Dutch wastewater policy," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(3), pages 579-607, September.
    6. Arnouts, Rikke & van der Zouwen, Mariëlle & Arts, Bas, 2012. "Analysing governance modes and shifts — Governance arrangements in Dutch nature policy," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 43-50.
    7. Erik Pruyt & Jan H. Kwakkel, 2014. "Radicalization under deep uncertainty: a multi-model exploration of activism, extremism, and terrorism," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 30(1-2), pages 1-28, January.
    8. Kutlu, Cigdem & Bioly, Sascha & Klumpp, Matthias, 2013. "Demografic change in the CEP sector," ild Schriftenreihe 36, FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, Institut für Logistik- & Dienstleistungsmanagement (ild).
    9. M. Isabel Sánchez-Hernández & Tomás M. Bañegil-Palacios & Ramón Sanguino-Galván, 2017. "Competitive Success in Responsible Regional Ecosystems: An Empirical Approach in Spain Focused on the Firms’ Relationship with Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-18, March.
    10. Tomasz Jeleński & Marta Dendys & Elżbieta Radziszewska-Zielina & Małgorzata Fedorczak-Cisak, 2021. "Inclusion of Renewable Energy Sources in Municipal Environmental Policy—The Case Study of Kraków, Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Hidayatno, Akhmad & Jafino, Bramka Arga & Setiawan, Andri D. & Purwanto, Widodo Wahyu, 2020. "When and why does transition fail? A model-based identification of adoption barriers and policy vulnerabilities for transition to natural gas vehicles," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    12. Jerrel R Yzer & Warren E Walker & Vincent A W J Marchau & Jan H Kwakkel, 2014. "Dynamic Adaptive Policies: A Way to Improve the Cost—Benefit Performance of Megaprojects?," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 41(4), pages 594-612, August.
    13. Danny P Soetanot & Marina van Geenhuizen, 2007. "Technology Incubators and Knowledge Networks: A Rough Set Approach in Comparative Project Analysis," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 34(6), pages 1011-1029, December.
    14. Aymen Sawassi & Roula Khadra, 2021. "Bibliometric Network Analysis of “Water Systems’ Adaptation to Climate Change Uncertainties”: Concepts, Approaches, Gaps, and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-14, June.
    15. Jean-Luc Pradel Mathurin Augustin & Shu-Yi Liaw, 2018. "Technology and Government Effort, A Two-headed Animal within the Competitiveness Index of the Travel and Tourism Industry," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(9), pages 144-159, September.
    16. Pogliani, Laura & Ronchi, Silvia & Arcidiacono, Andrea & di Martino, Viviana & Mazza, Francesca, 2023. "Regeneration in an ecological perspective. Urban and territorial equalisation for the provision of ecosystem services in the Metropolitan City of Milan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    17. Camisón, César & Forés, Beatriz, 2015. "Is tourism firm competitiveness driven by different internal or external specific factors?: New empirical evidence from Spain," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 477-499.
    18. Marchau, Vincent & Walker, Warren & van Duin, Ron, 2008. "An adaptive approach to implementing innovative urban transport solutions," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(6), pages 405-412, November.
    19. Kim Maund & Thayaparan Gajendran & Graham Brewer, 2018. "Key Issues for Implementation of Environmental Planning Policy: Construction Management Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, June.
    20. Fernando Nogueira & Monique Borges & Jan-Hendrik Wolf, 2017. "Collaborative Decision-Making in Non-formal Planning Settings," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 875-890, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:60:y:2017:i:c:p:91-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.