IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v57y2016icp64-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring conflict management, emotional self-efficacy, and problem solving confidence in an evaluation of outdoor programs for inner-city youth in Baltimore, Maryland

Author

Listed:
  • Caldas, Stephanie V.
  • Broaddus, Elena T.
  • Winch, Peter J.

Abstract

Substantial evidence supports the value of outdoor education programs for promoting healthy adolescent development, yet measurement of program outcomes often lacks rigor. Accurately assessing the impacts of programs that seek to promote positive youth development is critical for determining whether youth are benefitting as intended, identifying best practices and areas for improvement, and informing decisions about which programs to invest in.

Suggested Citation

  • Caldas, Stephanie V. & Broaddus, Elena T. & Winch, Peter J., 2016. "Measuring conflict management, emotional self-efficacy, and problem solving confidence in an evaluation of outdoor programs for inner-city youth in Baltimore, Maryland," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 64-71.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:57:y:2016:i:c:p:64-71
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.04.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718916300192
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.04.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee Cronbach, 1951. "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 16(3), pages 297-334, September.
    2. Henry Kaiser, 1970. "A second generation little jiffy," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 35(4), pages 401-415, December.
    3. Hirotugu Akaike, 1987. "Factor analysis and AIC," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 52(3), pages 317-332, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kolawole Iyiola & Husam Rjoub, 2020. "Using Conflict Management in Improving Owners and Contractors Relationship Quality in the Construction Industry: The Mediation Role of Trust," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440198, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tien-Ling Hu & Dubravka Svetina Valdivia, 2024. "Assessing the Psychometric Properties of Quality Experience in Undergraduate Research Using Item Response Theory," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 65(8), pages 1965-1991, December.
    2. Menictas, Con & Wang, Paul Z. & Louviere, Jordan J., 2012. "Assessing the validity of brand equity constructs," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 3-8.
    3. Chao-Ming Wang & Bo-Ting Lee & Ting-Yun Lo, 2023. "The Design of a Novel Digital Puzzle Gaming System for Young Children’s Learning by Interactive Multi-Sensing and Tangible User Interfacing Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-43, February.
    4. Stéphane McLachlan & Melisa Yestrau, 2009. "From the ground up: holistic management and grassroots rural adaptation to bovine spongiform encephalopathy across western Canada," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 299-316, April.
    5. Fanni Rencz & Béla Tamási & Valentin Brodszky & László Gulácsi & Miklós Weszl & Márta Péntek, 2019. "Validity and reliability of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) in a national survey in Hungary," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(1), pages 43-55, June.
    6. Headley, Andrea M. & Blount-Hill, Kwan-Lamar & St. John, Victor J., 2021. "The psychology of justice buildings: A survey experiment on police architecture, public sentiment, and race," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    7. Ryu, Do-Hyeon & Kim, Kwang-Jae, 2024. "The influence of information privacy concerns and perceived electricity usage habits on the usage intention of advanced metering infrastructure," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    8. Strutton, David & Pelton, Lou E. & Lumpkin, James R., 1995. "Sex differences in ingratiatory behavior : An investigation of influence tactics in the salesperson-customer dyad," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 35-45, September.
    9. Joseph Hagan & Marlene Walden, 2017. "Development and Evaluation of the Barriers to Nurses’ Participation in Research Questionnaire at a Large Academic Pediatric Hospital," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 26(2), pages 157-175, April.
    10. Dede Teteh & Marissa Ericson & Sabine Monice & Lenna Dawkins-Moultin & Nasim Bahadorani & Phyllis Clark & Eudora Mitchell & Lindsey S Treviño & Adana Llanos & Rick Kittles & Susanne Montgomery, 2019. "The Black identity, hair product use, and breast cancer scale," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-15, December.
    11. Robert A. Dees & Scott T. Nestler & Robert Kewley, 2013. "WholeSoldier Performance Appraisal to Support Mentoring and Personnel Decisions," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 10(1), pages 82-97, March.
    12. Chao-Ming Wang & Chen-Siang Huang, 2022. "Using Digital Technology to Design a Simple Interactive System for Nostalgic Gaming to Promote the Health of Slightly Disabled Elderly People," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-30, December.
    13. Monica Palma & Veronica Distefano & Alessandra Spennato, 2019. "Quality Assessment of the Oncology Health Service in a Public Hospital," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 327-343, November.
    14. Simona Catalina Stefan & Ion Popa & Cosmin Octavian Dobrin, 2016. "Towards a Model of Sustainable Competitiveness of Health Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-15, May.
    15. Bárbara Françoise Cardoso & Pery Francisco Assis Shikida & Adele Finco, 2017. "Development of Brazilian Biodiesel Sector from the Perspective of Stakeholders," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, March.
    16. Carlota Lorenzo-Romero & Efthymios Constantinides, 2019. "On-line Crowdsourcing: Motives of Customers to Participate in Online Collaborative Innovation Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, June.
    17. Szymon Zaleski & Rafał Michalski, 2021. "Success Factors in Sustainable Management of IT Service Projects: Exploratory Factor Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-28, April.
    18. Kobby Mensah & Justice Boateng Dankwah & Gilbert Mensah & Judith Aku Masope-Crabbe, 2021. "Choice, Purchase Decision and Post-Purchase Dissonance: The Social Media Perspective," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 13(3), pages 1-13.
    19. Dan Ke & Anran Chen & Chenting Su, 2016. "Online trust-building mechanisms for existing brands: the moderating role of the e-business platform certification system," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 189-216, June.
    20. Hermann Frank & Alexander Kessler & Thomas Rusch & Julia Suess–Reyes & Daniela Weismeier–Sammer, 2017. "Capturing the Familiness of Family Businesses: Development of the Family Influence Familiness Scale (FIFS)," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 41(5), pages 709-742, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:57:y:2016:i:c:p:64-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.