IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v36y2013i1p71-79.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An evaluability assessment of a West Africa based Non-Governmental Organization's (NGO) progressive evaluation strategy

Author

Listed:
  • D’Ostie-Racine, Léna
  • Dagenais, Christian
  • Ridde, Valéry

Abstract

While program evaluations are increasingly valued by international organizations to inform practices and public policies, actual evaluation use (EU) in such contexts is inconsistent. Moreover, empirical literature on EU in the context of humanitarian Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) is very limited. The current article focuses on the evaluability assessment (EA) of a West-Africa based humanitarian NGO's progressive evaluation strategy. Since 2007, the NGO has established an evaluation strategy to inform its maternal and child health care user-fee exemption intervention. Using Wholey's (2004) framework, the current EA enabled us to clarify with the NGO's evaluation partners the intent of their evaluation strategy and to design its program logic model. The EA ascertained the plausibility of the evaluation strategy's objectives, the accessibility of relevant data, and the utility for intended users of evaluating both the evaluation strategy and the conditions that foster EU. Hence, key evaluability conditions for an EU study were assured. This article provides an example of EA procedures when such guidance is scant in the literature. It also offers an opportunity to analyze critically the use of EAs in the context of a humanitarian NGO's collaboration with evaluators and political actors.

Suggested Citation

  • D’Ostie-Racine, Léna & Dagenais, Christian & Ridde, Valéry, 2013. "An evaluability assessment of a West Africa based Non-Governmental Organization's (NGO) progressive evaluation strategy," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 71-79.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:36:y:2013:i:1:p:71-79
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2012.07.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718912000626
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2012.07.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sanou, Aboubakary & Kouyaté, Bocar & Bibeau, Gilles & Nguyen, Vinh-Kim, 2011. "Evaluability Assessment of an immunization improvement strategy in rural Burkina Faso: Intervention theory versus reality, information need and evaluations," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 303-315, August.
    2. Ridde, Valéry & Goossens, Sylvie & Shakir, Sahibullah, 2012. "Short-term consultancy and collaborative evaluation in a post-conflict and humanitarian setting: Lessons from Afghanistan," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 180-188.
    3. Masood Ahmed, 2005. "Bridging research and policy," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(6), pages 765-773.
    4. Ridde, Valéry & Diarra, Aïssa & Moha, Mahaman, 2011. "User fees abolition policy in Niger: Comparing the under five years exemption implementation in two districts," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(3), pages 219-225, March.
    5. John Young, 2005. "Research, policy and practice: why developing countries are different," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(6), pages 727-734.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Holvoet, Nathalie & Van Esbroeck, Dirk & Inberg, Liesbeth & Popelier, Lisa & Peeters, Bob & Verhofstadt, Ellen, 2018. "To evaluate or not: Evaluability study of 40 interventions of Belgian development cooperation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 189-199.
    2. Guerra-López, Ingrid & Hicks, Karen, 2015. "The participatory design of a performance oriented monitoring and evaluation system in an international development environment," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 21-30.
    3. Léna D’Ostie-Racinea & Christian Dagenais & Valéry Ridde, 2021. "Examining Conditions that Influence Evaluation use within a Humanitarian Non-Governmental Organization in Burkina Faso (West Africa)," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 1-35, February.
    4. Hortigüela Arroyo, María & Ubillos Landa, Silvia, 2019. "Evaluability assessment of a community development leisure program in Spain," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 219-226.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Léna D’Ostie-Racinea & Christian Dagenais & Valéry Ridde, 2021. "Examining Conditions that Influence Evaluation use within a Humanitarian Non-Governmental Organization in Burkina Faso (West Africa)," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 1-35, February.
    2. Catherine Ragasa & Suresh Babu & John Ulimwengu, 2014. "Institutional reforms and agricultural policy process: lessons from Democratic Republic of Congo," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 2(1), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Aberman, Noora-Lisa & Schiffer, Eva & Johnson, Michael & Oboh, Victor, 2010. "Mapping the policy process in Nigeria," IFPRI discussion papers 1000, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    4. Potoae Roberts Aiafi, 2017. "The Nature of Public Policy Processes in the Pacific Islands," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(3), pages 451-466, September.
    5. Bach Xuan Tran & Vuong Minh Nong & Rachel Marie Maher & Phuong Khanh Nguyen & Hoat Ngoc Luu, 2014. "A Systematic Review of Scope and Quality of Health Economic Evaluation Studies in Vietnam," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-12, August.
    6. Eugenia Amporfu, 2013. "Effect of regulated user fee on quality of healthcare for the poor and the non-poor," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 60(4), pages 357-373, December.
    7. Julius T. Mugwagwa, 2013. "Revealing the footprint: Supranational organizations and transnational governance of biotechnology in southern Africa," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(1), pages 135-148, March.
    8. Henning, Christian H. C. A., 2015. "Modeling and evaluation of political processes: A new quantitative approach," Working Papers of Agricultural Policy WP2015-01, University of Kiel, Department of Agricultural Economics, Chair of Agricultural Policy.
    9. deGrassi, Aaron, 2007. "Linking research and policy: The case of Ghana's rice trade policy," GSSP working papers 10, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    10. Youtie, Jan & Bozeman, Barry & Jabbehdari, Sahra & Kao, Andrew, 2017. "Credibility and use of scientific and technical information in policy making: An analysis of the information bases of the National Research Council’s committee reports," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 108-120.
    11. Khodr, Hiba & Uherova Hasbani, Katarina, 2013. "The dynamics of energy policy in Lebanon when research, politics, and policy fail to intersect," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 629-642.
    12. Aberman, Noora-Lisa & Schiffer, Eva & Johnson, Michael & Oboh, Victor, 2009. "Mapping the policy process in Nigeria: Examining linkages between research and policy," NSSP working papers 12, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    13. Muhamad Rosyid Jazuli & Maimanah Mohammed Idris & Penlope Yaguma, 2022. "The importance of institutional quality: Reviewing the relevance of Indonesia’s Omnibus Law on national competitiveness," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, December.
    14. Ali Milani-Bonab & Naser Kalantari & Amirhossein Takian & Arezoo Haghighian-Roudsari, 2023. "Food and agriculture, nutrition and health related policy integration in Iran’s national development agenda and their alignment with the sustainable development goals," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 3353-3378, April.
    15. David Nkedianye & Dickson Kaelo & Robin Reid & Moses Neselle & Leonard Onetu & Ogeli Makui & Mohammed Said & Steven Kiruswa & Patti Kristjanson & Ololtisatti Kamuaro & Shem Kifugo & Nancy M. Dickson &, 2008. "Linking Knowledge with Action Using Community Facilitators to Span Boundaries: Lessons from East Africa," CID Working Papers 25, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    16. Nkedianye, David & Kaelo, Dickson & Reid, Robin & Neselle, Moses & Onetu, Leonard & Makui, Ogeli & Said, Mohammed & Kiruswa, Steve & Kristjanson, Patti & Kamuaro, Ololtisatti & Kifugo, Shem & Dickson,, 2009. "Linking Knowledge with Action Using Community Facilitators to Span Boundaries: Lessons from East Africa," Scholarly Articles 32062580, Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
    17. Ribeiro, Fernando & Ferreira, Paula & Araújo, Madalena, 2013. "Sustainability assessment of electricity production using a logic models approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 215-223.
    18. Chouinard, Jill Anne & Milley, Peter, 2018. "Uncovering the mysteries of inclusion: Empirical and methodological possibilities in participatory evaluation in an international context," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 70-78.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:36:y:2013:i:1:p:71-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.