IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v35y2012i2p280-286.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A mixed-method exploration of functioning in Safe Schools/Healthy Students partnerships

Author

Listed:
  • Merrill, Marina L.
  • Taylor, Nicole L.
  • Martin, Alison J.
  • Maxim, Lauren A.
  • D’Ambrosio, Ryan
  • Gabriel, Roy M.
  • Wendt, Staci J.
  • Mannix, Danyelle
  • Wells, Michael E.

Abstract

This paper presents a mixed-method approach to measuring the functioning of Safe Schools/Healthy Students (SS/HS) Initiative partnerships. The SS/HS national evaluation team developed a survey to collect partners’ perceptions of functioning within SS/HS partnerships. Average partnership functioning scores were used to rank each site from lowest to highest. Sites with the most favorable perceptions of partnership functioning were defined as having average scores in the top 10% (n=10) and sites with the least favorable perceptions of partnership functioning were defined as having average scores in the bottom 10% (n=10). Qualitative data for these 20 sites were inductively open coded for emergent themes and analyzed for patterns using grounded theory approach. Six themes emerged that distinguished sites reporting the most favorable and least favorable perceptions of partnership functioning: partner engagement, facilitators, barriers, shared decision making, partnership structure, and sustainability. Sites reporting the most favorable perceptions of partnership functioning effectively utilized collaboration processes that facilitate coalition building, such as shared decision making, effective communication, and developing a clearly defined structure. Qualitative themes from this analysis provide evidence of validity for the partnership functioning scale used and illustrate distinguishing features between sites with the most favorable and least favorable perceptions of partnership functioning.

Suggested Citation

  • Merrill, Marina L. & Taylor, Nicole L. & Martin, Alison J. & Maxim, Lauren A. & D’Ambrosio, Ryan & Gabriel, Roy M. & Wendt, Staci J. & Mannix, Danyelle & Wells, Michael E., 2012. "A mixed-method exploration of functioning in Safe Schools/Healthy Students partnerships," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 280-286.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:35:y:2012:i:2:p:280-286
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.11.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718911000978
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.11.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jasuja, Guneet Kaur & Chou, Chih-Ping & Bernstein, Karen & Wang, Eric & McClure, Maykami & Pentz, Mary Ann, 2005. "Using structural characteristics of community coalitions to predict progress in adopting evidence-based prevention programs," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 173-184, May.
    2. Hays, C. E. & Hays, S. P. & DeVille, J. O. & Mulhall, P. F., 2000. "Capacity for effectiveness: the relationship between coalition structure and community impact," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 373-379, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Valente, Thomas W. & Coronges, Kathryn A. & Stevens, Gregory D. & Cousineau, Michael R., 2008. "Collaboration and competition in a children's health initiative coalition: A network analysis," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 392-402, November.
    2. Silverman, Basha & Champney, Joanna & Steber, Sara-Ann & Zubritsky, Cynthia, 2015. "Collaborating for consensus: Considerations for convening Coalition stakeholders to promote a gender-based approach to addressing the health needs of sex workers," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 17-26.
    3. Kegler, Michelle C. & Rigler, Jessica & Honeycutt, Sally, 2011. "The role of community context in planning and implementing community-based health promotion projects," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 246-253, August.
    4. Reinert, Bonita & Carver, Vivien & Range, Lillian M., 2005. "Evaluating community tobacco use prevention coalitions," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 201-208, May.
    5. Wagemakers, Annemarie & Vaandrager, Lenneke & Koelen, Maria A. & Saan, Hans & Leeuwis, Cees, 2010. "Community health promotion: A framework to facilitate and evaluate supportive social environments for health," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 428-435, November.
    6. Perkins, Daniel F. & Feinberg, Mark E. & Greenberg, Mark T. & Johnson, Lesley E. & Chilenski, Sarah Meyer & Mincemoyer, Claudia C. & Spoth, Richard L., 2011. "Team factors that predict to sustainability indicators for community-based prevention teams," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 283-291, August.
    7. Jeroen J. L. Candel, 2022. "Power to the people? Food democracy initiatives’ contributions to democratic goods," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(4), pages 1477-1489, December.
    8. Hergüner, Burak, 2021. "An evaluation of undergraduate public administration programs at Turkish Universities: Reviewing the literature and proposing a model of cultural competence development," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    9. Barnes, Priscilla A. & Schaefer, Samantha & Middlestadt, Susan & Knoblock, Heidi, 2015. "Who's who in the crew? Exploring participant involvement in the Active Living Coalition," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 88-95.
    10. Walid El Ansari & Reza Oskrochi & Ceri Phillips, 2009. "Engagement and Action for Health: The Contribution of Leaders’ Collaborative Skills to Partnership Success," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-21, January.
    11. Jasuja, Guneet Kaur & Chou, Chih-Ping & Bernstein, Karen & Wang, Eric & McClure, Maykami & Pentz, Mary Ann, 2005. "Using structural characteristics of community coalitions to predict progress in adopting evidence-based prevention programs," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 173-184, May.
    12. Boutilier, Robert G. & Black, Leeora, 2013. "Legitimizing industry and multi-sectoral regulation of cumulative impacts: A comparison of mining and energy development in Athabasca, Canada and the Hunter Valley, Australia," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 696-703.
    13. Rog, Debra & Boback, Nicole & Barton-Villagrana, Heather & Marrone-Bennett, Patricia & Cardwell, John & Hawdon, James & Diaz, Jessica & Jenkins, Pamela & Kridler, Jamie & Reischl, Thomas, 2004. "Sustaining collaboratives: a cross-site analysis of The National Funding Collaborative on Violence Prevention," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 249-261, August.
    14. King, Gillian & Servais, Michelle & Kertoy, Marilyn & Specht, Jacqueline & Currie, Melissa & Rosenbaum, Peter & Law, Mary & Forchuk, Cheryl & Chalmers, Heather & Willoughby, Teena, 2009. "A measure of community members' perceptions of the impacts of research partnerships in health and social services," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 289-299, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:35:y:2012:i:2:p:280-286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.