IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v107y2024ics014971892400079x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Learning from graduate students’ non-formal evaluation experiences in university-based centers

Author

Listed:
  • Charlier, Devon
  • Hall, Suness
  • Kinzer, Hannah
  • LaVelle, John M.

Abstract

This paper examines graduate research assistants' informal applied learning experiences on the evaluation team at a university-based agricultural safety and health research center. The case study aims to identify the specific learning outcomes derived from the experience, as described by students, and the factors that facilitated them. The research team used a semi-structured focus group tool, and the focus group participants conducted their own analysis and interpretation of the data. An inductive qualitative analysis revealed that students had new perspectives on evaluation, greater evaluation knowledge, and comfort using evaluative tools. Students expressed that key factors like trust, respect, and reflective practice effectively fostered learning. These data were corroborated using deductive analysis using Fink’s Taxonomy of Significant Learning. Ultimately, the study supports the value of informal applied learning experiences for students, particularly in the field of evaluation, and describes a model of support to facilitate learning in various contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Charlier, Devon & Hall, Suness & Kinzer, Hannah & LaVelle, John M., 2024. "Learning from graduate students’ non-formal evaluation experiences in university-based centers," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:107:y:2024:i:c:s014971892400079x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102477
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014971892400079X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102477?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:107:y:2024:i:c:s014971892400079x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.