IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v107y2024ics014971892400079x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Learning from graduate students’ non-formal evaluation experiences in university-based centers

Author

Listed:
  • Charlier, Devon
  • Hall, Suness
  • Kinzer, Hannah
  • LaVelle, John M.

Abstract

This paper examines graduate research assistants' informal applied learning experiences on the evaluation team at a university-based agricultural safety and health research center. The case study aims to identify the specific learning outcomes derived from the experience, as described by students, and the factors that facilitated them. The research team used a semi-structured focus group tool, and the focus group participants conducted their own analysis and interpretation of the data. An inductive qualitative analysis revealed that students had new perspectives on evaluation, greater evaluation knowledge, and comfort using evaluative tools. Students expressed that key factors like trust, respect, and reflective practice effectively fostered learning. These data were corroborated using deductive analysis using Fink’s Taxonomy of Significant Learning. Ultimately, the study supports the value of informal applied learning experiences for students, particularly in the field of evaluation, and describes a model of support to facilitate learning in various contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Charlier, Devon & Hall, Suness & Kinzer, Hannah & LaVelle, John M., 2024. "Learning from graduate students’ non-formal evaluation experiences in university-based centers," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:107:y:2024:i:c:s014971892400079x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102477
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014971892400079X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102477?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Akella, Devi, 2010. "Learning together: Kolb's experiential theory and its application," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 100-112, March.
    2. LaVelle, John M. & Lovato, Chris & Stephenson, Clayton L., 2020. "Pedagogical considerations for the teaching of evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    3. Sabharwal, Meghna & Hu, Qian, 2013. "Participation in university-based research centers: Is it helping or hurting researchers?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(6), pages 1301-1311.
    4. Altschuld, James W., 1995. "Developing an evaluation program: Challenges in the teaching of evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 259-265.
    5. Donaldson, Stewart I., 2017. "Empowerment evaluation: An approach that has literally altered the landscape of evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 136-137.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bäker, Agnes, 2015. "Non-tenured post-doctoral researchers’ job mobility and research output: An analysis of the role of research discipline, department size, and coauthors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 634-650.
    2. Paulo Lopes Henriques & Carla Curado & Mírian Oliveira & Antônio Carlos Gastaud Maçada, 2019. "Publishing? You can count on knowledge, experience, and expectations," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 1301-1324, May.
    3. Chih-Hung Yuan & Yenchun Jim Wu & Kune-muh Tsai, 2019. "Supply Chain Innovation in Scientific Research Collaboration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-12, January.
    4. King, Jean A. & Ayoo, Sandra, 2020. "What do we know about evaluator education? A review of peer-reviewed publications (1978–2018)," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    5. Anson Chui Yan Tang & Meyrick Chum Ming Chow, 2021. "Learning Experience of Baccalaureate Nursing Students with Challenge-Based Learning in Hong Kong: A Descriptive Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-10, June.
    6. Poth, Cheryl N. & Searle, Michelle & Aquilina, Alexandra M. & Ge, Jenny & Elder, Alexa, 2020. "Assessing competency-based evaluation course impacts: A mixed methods case study," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    7. Curado, Carla & Henriques, Paulo Lopes & Oliveira, Mírian & Matos, Pedro Verga, 2016. "A fuzzy-set analysis of hard and soft sciences publication performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5348-5353.
    8. Pisarska Aleksandra, 2019. "Cooperative relations between public higher education institutions: the contextual nature of the process of their creation," Management, Sciendo, vol. 23(2), pages 205-222, December.
    9. Yifan Zuo & Dan Yao & Mu Zhang, 2020. "Exploration and Practice of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Awareness Embedded in Experimental Teaching of Economic Management Major Undergraduates: A Case Study from China," Higher Education Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(3), pages 1-53, September.
    10. Yi-Chuan Cheng & Li-Chi Huang & Chi-Hsuan Yang & Hsing-Chi Chang, 2020. "Experiential Learning Program to Strengthen Self-Reflection and Critical Thinking in Freshmen Nursing Students during COVID-19: A Quasi-Experimental Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-8, July.
    11. Kevin M. Kniffin & Andrew S. Hanks, 2017. "Antecedents and near-term consequences for interdisciplinary dissertators," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(3), pages 1225-1250, June.
    12. Paul Bolger, 2021. "A study of faculty perceptions and engagement with interdisciplinary research in university sustainability institutes," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 11(1), pages 115-129, March.
    13. Erin Leahey & Sondra N. Barringer & Misty Ring-Ramirez, 2019. "Universities’ structural commitment to interdisciplinary research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(3), pages 891-919, March.
    14. Leahey, Erin & Barringer, Sondra N., 2020. "Universities’ commitment to interdisciplinary research: To what end?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(2).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:107:y:2024:i:c:s014971892400079x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.