IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enscpo/v75y2017icp1-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Success in preserving historic rural landscapes under various policy measures: Incentives, restrictions or planning?

Author

Listed:
  • Sklenicka, Petr
  • Kottová, Blanka
  • Šálek, Miroslav

Abstract

Historic rural landscapes are valuable not only as artefacts and as cultural heritage, but also as natural sites with great scenic qualities. Unfortunately, the total area of these landscapes was dramatically reduced in the course of the second half of the 20th century. In our study, we focus on the development of 38 fragments of medieval hedgerow-defined field patterns in Czechia referred to as pluzina, in an attempt to reveal significant determinants of their persistence or disappearance between 1996 and 2016. Using patch-scale spatial data generated from GIS, mixed-effect modelling was performed to test for the effects of five local drivers and their first-order interactions in explaining the variation of the preservation rate of these features. The study reveals a trend towards a slight decrease in the total area of these valuable field patterns. However, the trends vary greatly from area to area. This reflects not only the influence of natural determinants but also a significant effect of land-use policy measures in individual areas over the study period.

Suggested Citation

  • Sklenicka, Petr & Kottová, Blanka & Šálek, Miroslav, 2017. "Success in preserving historic rural landscapes under various policy measures: Incentives, restrictions or planning?," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1-9.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enscpo:v:75:y:2017:i:c:p:1-9
    DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.05.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901117301375
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.05.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Markuszewska Iwona, 2019. "Sentimentality versus Transformation of the Historical Traditional Rural Landscape (A Case Study: The Landscape of Dutch Law Settlement in Poland)," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 38(1), pages 53-70, March.
    2. Hana Vavrouchová & Antonín Vaishar & Veronika Peřinková, 2022. "Historical Landscape Elements of Abandoned Foothill Villages—A Case Study of the Historical Territory of Moravia and Silesia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Yingqian Huang & Fengqin Li & Hualin Xie, 2020. "A Scientometrics Review on Farmland Abandonment Research," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-26, August.
    4. Ricardo Martín & Víctor Yepes, 2021. "Bridging the Gap between Landscape and Management within Marinas: A Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, August.
    5. Johana Zacharová & Jiří Riezner & Jitka Elznicová & Iva Machová & Karel Kubát & Diana Holcová & Michal Holec & Jan Pacina & Jiří Štojdl & Tomáš Matys Grygar, 2022. "Historical Agricultural Landforms—Central European Bio-Cultural Heritage Worthy of Attention," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-25, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enscpo:v:75:y:2017:i:c:p:1-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/environmental-science-and-policy/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.