IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v66y2014icp643-653.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of a solar-powered transcritical CO2 (carbon dioxide) power cycle for reverse osmosis desalination based on the recovery of cryogenic energy of LNG (liquefied natural gas)

Author

Listed:
  • Xia, Guanghui
  • Sun, Qingxuan
  • Cao, Xu
  • Wang, Jiangfeng
  • Yu, Yizhao
  • Wang, Laisheng

Abstract

A solar-powered transcritical CO2 (carbon dioxide) power cycle for reverse osmosis desalination based on the recovery of cryogenic energy of LNG (liquefied natural gas) is proposed. The system consists of a solar collector subsystem, a transcritical CO2 power cycle subsystem, a LNG subsystem and a RO (reverse osmosis) desalination subsystem. A thermal storage unit is introduced into the system to guarantee continuous and stable operation of the system. A mathematical model is developed to simulate the system based on several assumptions. The effects of several key thermodynamic parameters on the system performance are examined based on the performance criteria, including daily exergy efficiency, daily mechanical work output and daily fresh work output. Parametric optimization is conducted by genetic algorithm to maximize the daily fresh water output. The results show that the CO2 turbine inlet pressure has an optimal value to reach the daily maximum exergy efficiency under the given conditions. The daily exergy efficiency could decrease with an increase in condenser temperature, and increase with an increase in mass flow rate of oil and NG turbine inlet pressure. Through parametric optimization, the system can reach the daily exergy efficiency of 4.90% and provide 2537.33 m3 fresh water per day under the given conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Xia, Guanghui & Sun, Qingxuan & Cao, Xu & Wang, Jiangfeng & Yu, Yizhao & Wang, Laisheng, 2014. "Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of a solar-powered transcritical CO2 (carbon dioxide) power cycle for reverse osmosis desalination based on the recovery of cryogenic energy of LNG (liquefied n," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 643-653.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:66:y:2014:i:c:p:643-653
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.12.029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544213010864
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2013.12.029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manolakos, D. & Kosmadakis, G. & Kyritsis, S. & Papadakis, G., 2009. "Identification of behaviour and evaluation of performance of small scale, low-temperature Organic Rankine Cycle system coupled with a RO desalination unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 767-774.
    2. Song, Yuhui & Wang, Jiangfeng & Dai, Yiping & Zhou, Enmin, 2012. "Thermodynamic analysis of a transcritical CO2 power cycle driven by solar energy with liquified natural gas as its heat sink," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 194-203.
    3. Kosmadakis, G. & Manolakos, D. & Kyritsis, S. & Papadakis, G., 2009. "Economic assessment of a two-stage solar organic Rankine cycle for reverse osmosis desalination," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 1579-1586.
    4. Cayer, Emmanuel & Galanis, Nicolas & Desilets, Martin & Nesreddine, Hakim & Roy, Philippe, 2009. "Analysis of a carbon dioxide transcritical power cycle using a low temperature source," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(7-8), pages 1055-1063, July.
    5. Zhang, Na & Lior, Noam, 2006. "A novel near-zero CO2 emission thermal cycle with LNG cryogenic exergy utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(10), pages 1666-1679.
    6. Nafey, A.S. & Sharaf, M.A., 2010. "Combined solar organic Rankine cycle with reverse osmosis desalination process: Energy, exergy, and cost evaluations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 2571-2580.
    7. Zhang, Xin-Rong & Yamaguchi, Hiroshi & Uneno, Daisuke, 2007. "Experimental study on the performance of solar Rankine system using supercritical CO2," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(15), pages 2617-2628.
    8. Zhang, X.R. & Yamaguchi, H. & Uneno, D. & Fujima, K. & Enomoto, M. & Sawada, N., 2006. "Analysis of a novel solar energy-powered Rankine cycle for combined power and heat generation using supercritical carbon dioxide," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(12), pages 1839-1854.
    9. Cayer, Emmanuel & Galanis, Nicolas & Nesreddine, Hakim, 2010. "Parametric study and optimization of a transcritical power cycle using a low temperature source," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(4), pages 1349-1357, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naseri, Ali & Bidi, Mokhtar & Ahmadi, Mohammad H., 2017. "Thermodynamic and exergy analysis of a hydrogen and permeate water production process by a solar-driven transcritical CO2 power cycle with liquefied natural gas heat sink," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1215-1228.
    2. Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Moftakhari Sharifzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi & Rosen, Marc A., 2016. "Energy and exergy analyses of a novel power cycle using the cold of LNG (liquefied natural gas) and low-temperature solar energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 324-345.
    3. Song, Yuhui & Wang, Jiangfeng & Dai, Yiping & Zhou, Enmin, 2012. "Thermodynamic analysis of a transcritical CO2 power cycle driven by solar energy with liquified natural gas as its heat sink," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 194-203.
    4. Sarkar, Jahar, 2015. "Review and future trends of supercritical CO2 Rankine cycle for low-grade heat conversion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 434-451.
    5. Vélez, Fredy & Segovia, José & Chejne, Farid & Antolín, Gregorio & Quijano, Ana & Carmen Martín, M., 2011. "Low temperature heat source for power generation: Exhaustive analysis of a carbon dioxide transcritical power cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 5497-5507.
    6. Dai, Baomin & Li, Minxia & Ma, Yitai, 2014. "Thermodynamic analysis of carbon dioxide blends with low GWP (global warming potential) working fluids-based transcritical Rankine cycles for low-grade heat energy recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 942-952.
    7. Crespi, Francesco & Gavagnin, Giacomo & Sánchez, David & Martínez, Gonzalo S., 2017. "Supercritical carbon dioxide cycles for power generation: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 152-183.
    8. Muhammad, Hafiz Ali & Lee, Beomjoon & Lee, Gilbong & Cho, Junhyun & Baik, Young-Jin, 2019. "Investigation of leakage reinjection system for supercritical CO2 power cycle using heat pump," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 97-106.
    9. Sarkar, Jahar, 2015. "Analyses and optimization of a supercritical N2O Rankine cycle for low-grade heat conversion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 344-351.
    10. Shengjun, Zhang & Huaixin, Wang & Tao, Guo, 2011. "Performance comparison and parametric optimization of subcritical Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) and transcritical power cycle system for low-temperature geothermal power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(8), pages 2740-2754, August.
    11. Wang, Jiangfeng & Sun, Zhixin & Dai, Yiping & Ma, Shaolin, 2010. "Parametric optimization design for supercritical CO2 power cycle using genetic algorithm and artificial neural network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(4), pages 1317-1324, April.
    12. Chen, Huijuan & Goswami, D. Yogi & Stefanakos, Elias K., 2010. "A review of thermodynamic cycles and working fluids for the conversion of low-grade heat," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 3059-3067, December.
    13. Bao, Junjiang & Zhao, Li, 2012. "Exergy analysis and parameter study on a novel auto-cascade Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 539-547.
    14. Wang, Xurong & Dai, Yiping, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis of utilizing the transcritical CO2 cycle and the ORC for a recompression supercritical CO2 cycle waste heat recovery: A comparative study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 193-207.
    15. Ghaebi, Hadi & Rostamzadeh, Hadi, 2020. "Performance comparison of two new cogeneration systems for freshwater and power production based on organic Rankine and Kalina cycles driven by salinity-gradient solar pond," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 748-767.
    16. Chen, Huijuan & Yogi Goswami, D. & Rahman, Muhammad M. & Stefanakos, Elias K., 2011. "Energetic and exergetic analysis of CO2- and R32-based transcritical Rankine cycles for low-grade heat conversion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(8), pages 2802-2808, August.
    17. Le, Van Long & Kheiri, Abdelhamid & Feidt, Michel & Pelloux-Prayer, Sandrine, 2014. "Thermodynamic and economic optimizations of a waste heat to power plant driven by a subcritical ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle) using pure or zeotropic working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 622-638.
    18. Baik, Young-Jin & Kim, Minsung & Chang, Ki Chang & Kim, Sung Jin, 2011. "Power-based performance comparison between carbon dioxide and R125 transcritical cycles for a low-grade heat source," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(3), pages 892-898, March.
    19. Xia, Jiaxi & Wang, Jiangfeng & Zhou, Kehan & Zhao, Pan & Dai, Yiping, 2018. "Thermodynamic and economic analysis and multi-objective optimization of a novel transcritical CO2 Rankine cycle with an ejector driven by low grade heat source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 337-351.
    20. Wang, J.L. & Zhao, L. & Wang, X.D., 2010. "A comparative study of pure and zeotropic mixtures in low-temperature solar Rankine cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(11), pages 3366-3373, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:66:y:2014:i:c:p:643-653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.