IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v194y2020ics0360544219325265.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermodynamic analysis of CaO enhanced steam gasification process of food waste with high moisture and low moisture

Author

Listed:
  • Xiong, Shanshan
  • He, Jiang
  • Yang, Zhongqing
  • Guo, Mingnv
  • Yan, Yunfei
  • Ran, Jingyu

Abstract

Steam gasification process of food waste (FW) represented by flour, peanut shell, vegetable and banana peel was studied by thermodynamic analysis. With changing of gasification temperature, syngas distribution, LHV, energy efficiency and exergy efficiency were analyzed. Beside addition of CaO, gasification characteristics of FW with high moisture and low moisture were compared. For FW with high moisture, when S/F = 0.5, concentrations of H2 and CO2 are decreased with elevated temperature (923 K–1123 K), while concentrations of H2 and CO of FW with low moisture are increased. Besides, for FW with high moisture, concentration of CO2 is higher than that of CO, and CH4 concentration is lower than 2%. High moisture of FW causes lower LHV, lower energy efficiency and exergy efficiency. When S/C = 1, Ca/C = 1, O2/C = 0.1, H2 yield is promoted from 41.8 mol/kg (1000 K) to 49.2 mol/kg (900 K) by CaO, while H2 concentration is improved from 44.5% (1000 K) to 82.0% (800 K). With CaO added, maximum energy efficiency and exergy efficiency of FW with low moisture are about 90% and 78% respectively, while that of FW with high moisture are about 48% and 39% respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiong, Shanshan & He, Jiang & Yang, Zhongqing & Guo, Mingnv & Yan, Yunfei & Ran, Jingyu, 2020. "Thermodynamic analysis of CaO enhanced steam gasification process of food waste with high moisture and low moisture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:194:y:2020:i:c:s0360544219325265
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544219325265
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116831?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Prins, Mark J. & Ptasinski, Krzysztof J. & Janssen, Frans J.J.G., 2007. "From coal to biomass gasification: Comparison of thermodynamic efficiency," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1248-1259.
    2. Wang, Sheng & Bi, Xiaotao & Wang, Shudong, 2015. "Thermodynamic analysis of biomass gasification for biomethane production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1207-1218.
    3. Morris, David R. & Szargut, Jan, 1986. "Standard chemical exergy of some elements and compounds on the planet earth," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 11(8), pages 733-755.
    4. Guan, Jian & Wang, Qinhui & Li, Xiaomin & Luo, Zhongyang & Cen, Kefa, 2007. "Thermodynamic analysis of a biomass anaerobic gasification process for hydrogen production with sufficient CaO," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(15), pages 2502-2515.
    5. Dincer, Ibrahim, 2002. "The role of exergy in energy policy making," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 137-149, January.
    6. Szargut, J. & Stanek, W., 2007. "Thermo-ecological optimization of a solar collector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 584-590.
    7. Ahmed, I.I. & Gupta, A.K., 2010. "Pyrolysis and gasification of food waste: Syngas characteristics and char gasification kinetics," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 101-108, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Verma, Shivpal & Dregulo, Andrei Mikhailovich & Kumar, Vinay & Bhargava, Preeti Chaturvedi & Khan, Nawaz & Singh, Anuradha & Sun, Xinwei & Sindhu, Raveendran & Binod, Parameswaran & Zhang, Zengqiang &, 2023. "Reaction engineering during biomass gasification and conversion to energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    2. Ibnu Irawan, 2023. "Computational Fluid Dynamic Analysis in Spray Dryer Design By Distillation System Of Sea Water To Salt," Technium, Technium Science, vol. 17(1), pages 401-406.
    3. Ajorloo, Mojtaba & Ghodrat, Maryam & Scott, Jason & Strezov, Vladimir, 2022. "Modelling and statistical analysis of plastic biomass mixture co-gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    4. Xie, Huaqing & Li, Rongquan & Yu, Zhenyu & Wang, Zhengyu & Yu, Qingbo & Qin, Qin, 2020. "Combined steam/dry reforming of bio-oil for H2/CO syngas production with blast furnace slag as heat carrier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    5. Yin, Kexin & Wang, Yangyang & Wu, Qiming & Zhang, Jifu & Zhou, Yaru & Xu, Zaifeng & Zhu, Zhaoyou & Qi, Jianguang & Wang, Yinglong & Cui, Peizhe, 2024. "Thermodynamic analysis of a plasma co-gasification process for hydrogen production using sludge and food waste as mixed raw materials," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    6. Usmani, Sameer & Gonzalez Quiroga, Arturo & Vasquez Padilla, Ricardo & Palmer, Graeme & Lake, Maree, 2020. "Simulation model of the characteristics of syngas from hardwood biomass for thermally integrated gasification using unisim design tool," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    7. Li, Chongcong & Liu, Rui & Zheng, Jinhao & Zhang, Yan, 2023. "Thermodynamic study on the effects of operating parameters on CaO-based sorption enhanced steam gasification of biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shao, Ling & Wu, Zi & Chen, G.Q., 2013. "Exergy based ecological footprint accounting for China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 83-96.
    2. Udomsirichakorn, Jakkapong & Salam, P. Abdul, 2014. "Review of hydrogen-enriched gas production from steam gasification of biomass: The prospect of CaO-based chemical looping gasification," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 565-579.
    3. Zhang, Bo & Chen, G.Q. & Xia, X.H. & Li, S.C. & Chen, Z.M. & Ji, Xi, 2012. "Environmental emissions by Chinese industry: Exergy-based unifying assessment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 490-501.
    4. Bo Zhang & Suping Peng & Xiangyang Xu & Lijie Wang, 2011. "Embodiment Analysis for Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Chinese Economy Based on Global Thermodynamic Potentials," Energies, MDPI, vol. 4(11), pages 1-19, November.
    5. Huang, Y.W. & Chen, M.Q. & Li, Q.H. & Xing, W., 2018. "Hydrogen-rich syngas produced from co-gasification of wet sewage sludge and torrefied biomass in self-generated steam agent," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 202-213.
    6. Martínez González, Aldemar & Lesme Jaén, René & Silva Lora, Electo Eduardo, 2020. "Thermodynamic assessment of the integrated gasification-power plant operating in the sawmill industry: An energy and exergy analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 1151-1163.
    7. Chen, B. & Chen, G.Q., 2007. "Modified ecological footprint accounting and analysis based on embodied exergy--a case study of the Chinese society 1981-2001," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2-3), pages 355-376, March.
    8. Becerra-Lopez, Humberto R. & Golding, Peter, 2007. "Dynamic exergy analysis for capacity expansion of regional power-generation systems: Case study of far West Texas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(11), pages 2167-2186.
    9. Banerjee, A. & Tierney, M., 2011. "Comparison of five exergoenvironmental methods applied to candidate energy systems for rural villages in developing countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 2650-2661.
    10. AlNouss, Ahmed & McKay, Gordon & Al-Ansari, Tareq, 2020. "Enhancing waste to hydrogen production through biomass feedstock blending: A techno-economic-environmental evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    11. Stanek, Wojciech & Czarnowska, Lucyna, 2018. "Thermo-ecological cost – Szargut's proposal on exergy and ecology connection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 1050-1059.
    12. Bejan, Adrian, 2018. "Thermodynamics today," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 1208-1219.
    13. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    14. Gassner, Martin & Maréchal, François, 2009. "Thermodynamic comparison of the FICFB and Viking gasification concepts," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 1744-1753.
    15. Balcombe, Paul & Speirs, Jamie & Johnson, Erin & Martin, Jeanne & Brandon, Nigel & Hawkes, Adam, 2018. "The carbon credentials of hydrogen gas networks and supply chains," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1077-1088.
    16. Loha, Chanchal & Chattopadhyay, Himadri & Chatterjee, Pradip K., 2011. "Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen rich synthetic gas generation from fluidized bed gasification of rice husk," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 4063-4071.
    17. Hao, Xiaoqing & An, Haizhong & Qi, Hai & Gao, Xiangyun, 2016. "Evolution of the exergy flow network embodied in the global fossil energy trade: Based on complex network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1515-1522.
    18. Colombo, Emanuela & Rocco, Matteo V. & Toro, Claudia & Sciubba, Enrico, 2015. "An exergy-based approach to the joint economic and environmental impact assessment of possible photovoltaic scenarios: A case study at a regional level in Italy," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 318(C), pages 64-74.
    19. Chen, G.Q. & Qi, Z.H., 2007. "Systems account of societal exergy utilization: China 2003," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 208(2), pages 102-118.
    20. Ozgener, Leyla & Ozgener, Onder, 2010. "An experimental study of the exergetic performance of an underground air tunnel system for greenhouse cooling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 2804-2811.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:194:y:2020:i:c:s0360544219325265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.