IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v29y2004i12p2289-2295.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy yield ratio and cumulative energy demand for wind energy converters

Author

Listed:
  • Wagner, Hermann-Josef
  • Pick, Erich

Abstract

The cumulative energy demand and the energy yield ratio can be seen as an indicator of environmental impacts to estimate the depletion of energy resources considering a whole lifecycle. For two wind energy converters (1.5 and 0.5 MW) these figures have been calculated. For calculating energy yield ratio, the yearly energy output of three sites has been selected: coastal, near coastal and inland. The cumulative energy demand of the wind energy converter varies from 13,795 to 13,927 GJ. The energy yield ratio is between 70 and 40 depending on the selected site.

Suggested Citation

  • Wagner, Hermann-Josef & Pick, Erich, 2004. "Energy yield ratio and cumulative energy demand for wind energy converters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(12), pages 2289-2295.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:29:y:2004:i:12:p:2289-2295
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2004.03.038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054420400115X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2004.03.038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abdelkafi, Achraf & Krichen, Lotfi, 2011. "New strategy of pitch angle control for energy management of a wind farm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 1470-1479.
    2. Abolhosseini, Shahrouz & Heshmati, Almas & Altmann, Jörn, 2014. "A Review of Renewable Energy Supply and Energy Efficiency Technologies," IZA Discussion Papers 8145, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Bayod-Rújula, Ángel A. & Lorente-Lafuente, Ana M. & Cirez-Oto, Fernando, 2011. "Environmental assessment of grid connected photovoltaic plants with 2-axis tracking versus fixed modules systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3148-3158.
    4. Arvesen, Anders & Hertwich, Edgar G., 2012. "Assessing the life cycle environmental impacts of wind power: A review of present knowledge and research needs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(8), pages 5994-6006.
    5. Nabavi-Pelesaraei, Ashkan & Azadi, Hossein & Van Passel, Steven & Saber, Zahra & Hosseini-Fashami, Fatemeh & Mostashari-Rad, Fatemeh & Ghasemi-Mobtaker, Hassan, 2021. "Prospects of solar systems in production chain of sunflower oil using cold press method with concentrating energy and life cycle assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    6. Mirzaei, Amin & Jusoh, Awang & Salam, Zainal, 2012. "Design and implementation of high efficiency non-isolated bidirectional zero voltage transition pulse width modulated DC–DC converters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 358-369.
    7. Kubiszewski, Ida & Cleveland, Cutler J. & Endres, Peter K., 2010. "Meta-analysis of net energy return for wind power systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 218-225.
    8. Malça, João & Freire, Fausto, 2006. "Renewability and life-cycle energy efficiency of bioethanol and bio-ethyl tertiary butyl ether (bioETBE): Assessing the implications of allocation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(15), pages 3362-3380.
    9. Tariq Muneer & Rory Dowell, 2022. "Potential for renewable energy–assisted harvesting of potatoes in Scotland [Energy supply, its demands and security issues for developed and emerging economies]," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 17, pages 469-481.
    10. Kaldellis, J.K. & Apostolou, D., 2017. "Life cycle energy and carbon footprint of offshore wind energy. Comparison with onshore counterpart," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 72-84.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:29:y:2004:i:12:p:2289-2295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.