IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v299y2024ics0360544224011745.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selection of an economics-energy-environment scheduling strategy for a community virtual power plant considering decision-makers’ risk attitudes based on improved information gap decision theory

Author

Listed:
  • Gao, Fangjie
  • Gao, Jianwei
  • Huang, Ningbo
  • Wu, Haoyu

Abstract

To address the impact of decision-makers' risk attitudes (DMRA) and uncertainties on dispatch strategy in community integrated energy systems, a multi-objective dispatch model of a community virtual power plant (CVPP) is proposed. Firstly, a novel CVPP model that considers DMRA and a multi-objective satisfaction model of economics-energy-environment are built. Secondly, the information gap decision theory (IGDT) model is improved by considering uncertainties of renewable energy, loads, and DMRA. Thirdly, the VIKOR method is improved by using the weights from multiple objective functions derived by combining the entropy weight and full consistency method. And the conservative and risky strategy selection methods in the VIKOR method are used to select the optimal strategy from the obtained multi-objective Pareto solution set that satisfies decision-makers with risk preferences. Thus, the impact of DMRA on optimal strategy selection is fully described. Finally, the proposed model's effectiveness is validated using a multi-scenario example of a residential area. The results indicate that: 1) The novel CVPP provides realistic scheduling strategies based on the DMRA. 2) After implementing demand response, the resident cost and net carbon emissions are reduced by 9 % and 91 %, respectively. Energy supplier profit and renewable energy utilization rate are increased. The constructed IGDT model also improves multiple objectives. 3) The improved IGDT model's uncertainty and deviation factors allow for diverse scheduling strategies. Simultaneously, the improved VIKOR method provides a new method for decision-makers to select strategies. The model is a guide for selecting scheduling strategies and a way of encouraging the usage of renewable energy.

Suggested Citation

  • Gao, Fangjie & Gao, Jianwei & Huang, Ningbo & Wu, Haoyu, 2024. "Selection of an economics-energy-environment scheduling strategy for a community virtual power plant considering decision-makers’ risk attitudes based on improved information gap decision theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:299:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224011745
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.131401
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224011745
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2024.131401?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tajeddini, Mohammad Amin & Rahimi-Kian, Ashkan & Soroudi, Alireza, 2014. "Risk averse optimal operation of a virtual power plant using two stage stochastic programming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 958-967.
    2. Opricovic, Serafim & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2007. "Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(2), pages 514-529, April.
    3. Liu, Chunming & Wang, Chunling & Yin, Yujun & Yang, Peihong & Jiang, Hui, 2022. "Bi-level dispatch and control strategy based on model predictive control for community integrated energy system considering dynamic response performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    4. Ju, Liwei & Zhao, Rui & Tan, Qinliang & Lu, Yan & Tan, Qingkun & Wang, Wei, 2019. "A multi-objective robust scheduling model and solution algorithm for a novel virtual power plant connected with power-to-gas and gas storage tank considering uncertainty and demand response," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 1336-1355.
    5. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    6. Matamala, Yolanda & Feijoo, Felipe, 2021. "A two-stage stochastic Stackelberg model for microgrid operation with chance constraints for renewable energy generation uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    7. Lin, Boqiang & Jia, Zhijie, 2020. "Is emission trading scheme an opportunity for renewable energy in China? A perspective of ETS revenue redistributions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    8. Aien, Morteza & Hajebrahimi, Ali & Fotuhi-Firuzabad, Mahmud, 2016. "A comprehensive review on uncertainty modeling techniques in power system studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1077-1089.
    9. Zhou, Yizhou & Wei, Zhinong & Sun, Guoqiang & Cheung, Kwok W. & Zang, Haixiang & Chen, Sheng, 2018. "A robust optimization approach for integrated community energy system in energy and ancillary service markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1-15.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ju, Liwei & Yin, Zhe & Zhou, Qingqing & Li, Qiaochu & Wang, Peng & Tian, Wenxu & Li, Peng & Tan, Zhongfu, 2022. "Nearly-zero carbon optimal operation model and benefit allocation strategy for a novel virtual power plant using carbon capture, power-to-gas, and waste incineration power in rural areas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    2. Naval, Natalia & Yusta, Jose M., 2021. "Virtual power plant models and electricity markets - A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    3. Xu, Jiazhu & Yi, Yuqin, 2023. "Multi-microgrid low-carbon economy operation strategy considering both source and load uncertainty: A Nash bargaining approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PB).
    4. Mohseni, Soheil & Brent, Alan C. & Kelly, Scott & Browne, Will N., 2022. "Demand response-integrated investment and operational planning of renewable and sustainable energy systems considering forecast uncertainties: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    5. Nosratabadi, Seyyed Mostafa & Hooshmand, Rahmat-Allah & Gholipour, Eskandar, 2017. "A comprehensive review on microgrid and virtual power plant concepts employed for distributed energy resources scheduling in power systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 341-363.
    6. Wafa Nafkha-Tayari & Seifeddine Ben Elghali & Ehsan Heydarian-Forushani & Mohamed Benbouzid, 2022. "Virtual Power Plants Optimization Issue: A Comprehensive Review on Methods, Solutions, and Prospects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    7. Zhaoyu Cao & Yucheng Zou & Xu Zhao & Kairong Hong & Yanwei Zhang, 2021. "Multidimensional Fairness Equilibrium Evaluation of Urban Housing Expropriation Compensation Based on VIKOR," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-26, February.
    8. Yu, Songyuan & Fang, Fang & Liu, Yajuan & Liu, Jizhen, 2019. "Uncertainties of virtual power plant: Problems and countermeasures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 454-470.
    9. Zhang, Chaoyi & Jiao, Zaibin & Liu, Junshan & Ning, Keer, 2023. "Robust planning and economic analysis of park-level integrated energy system considering photovoltaic/thermal equipment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    10. Yang, Shenbo & Fang, Jiangpeng & Zhang, Zheyu & Lv, ShuoShuo & Lin, Hongyu & Ju, Liwei, 2024. "Two-stage coordinated optimal dispatching model and benefit allocation strategy for rural new energy microgrid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    11. Donglin Ren & Liang Liu & Xiujuan Gong & Pan Jiang & Shu Liu & Yirui Yang & Ruifeng Jin, 2022. "Effect Evaluation of Ecological Compensation for Strategic Mineral Resources Exploitation Based on VIKOR-AISM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, November.
    12. Amit Kumer Podder & Sayemul Islam & Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar & Aneesh A. Chand & Pulivarthi Nageswara Rao & Kushal A. Prasad & T. Logeswaran & Kabir A. Mamun, 2020. "Systematic Categorization of Optimization Strategies for Virtual Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-46, November.
    13. Li, Qiang & Zhou, Yongcheng & Wei, Fanchao & Li, Shuangxiu & Wang, Zhonghao & Li, Jiajia & Zhou, Guowen & Liu, Jinfu & Yan, Peigang & Yu, Daren, 2024. "Multi-time scale scheduling for virtual power plants: Integrating the flexibility of power generation and multi-user loads while considering the capacity degradation of energy storage systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 362(C).
    14. Seow Eng Ong & Davin Wang & Calvin Chua, 2023. "Disruptive Innovation and Real Estate Agency: The Disruptee Strikes Back," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 67(2), pages 287-317, August.
    15. Herrmann, Tabea & Hübler, Olaf & Menkhoff, Lukas & Schmidt, Ulrich, 2016. "Allais for the poor," Kiel Working Papers 2036, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    16. Christiane Goodfellow & Dirk Schiereck & Steffen Wippler, 2013. "Are behavioural finance equity funds a superior investment? A note on fund performance and market efficiency," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 14(2), pages 111-119, April.
    17. Berg, Joyce E. & Rietz, Thomas A., 2019. "Longshots, overconfidence and efficiency on the Iowa Electronic Market," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 271-287.
    18. Reckers, Philip M.J. & Sanders, Debra L. & Roark, Stephen J., 1994. "The Influence of Ethical Attitudes on Taxpayer Compliance," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 47(4), pages 825-836, December.
    19. Bier, Vicki & Gutfraind, Alexander, 2019. "Risk analysis beyond vulnerability and resilience – characterizing the defensibility of critical systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(2), pages 626-636.
    20. Sitinjak Elizabeth Lucky Maretha & Haryanti Kristiana & Kurniasari Widuri & Sasmito Yohanes Wisnu Djati, 2019. "Investor behavior based on personality and company life cycle," HOLISTICA – Journal of Business and Public Administration, Sciendo, vol. 10(2), pages 23-38, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:299:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224011745. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.