IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v28y2003i12p1229-1258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Techno-economic analysis of co-fired biomass integrated gasification/combined cycle systems with inclusion of economies of scale

Author

Listed:
  • Rodrigues, Monica
  • Faaij, Andre P.C.
  • Walter, Arnaldo

Abstract

This work focuses on short-term application of biomass integrated gasification/combined cycle (BIG/CC) technology with co-firing of natural gas and biomass derived gas. Co-firing leads to higher efficiency and lower costs of BIG/CC technology. A full technical and economic analysis was carried out by integrating performance modeling from co-fired CC and scale effects over a wide range of capacities (20–300 MWe). The gasification technology is directly air-heated and the feedstock is sugar cane residue. Co-firing alleviates the need for de-rating gas turbines, which would reduce efficiency. It also allows combined cycles to be scaled up beyond the limits imposed by single vessel gasifiers. Mixing of LCV gas and natural gas can greatly improve the cost-effectiveness of power generated by BIG/CC. The cost of electricity (COE) for biomass reaches a minimum with 50% proportion of natural gas in the mixture. For proportions of natural gas higher than 60%, the biomass-based power in a co-firing scheme may become less cost-effective than a BIG/CC. A sensitivity analysis shows that if the energy input consists of 50% biomass, the most sensitive parameters—in decreasing order—are the efficiency, the capital costs of the combined cycle, the gas cleanup equipment and the biomass fuel costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodrigues, Monica & Faaij, Andre P.C. & Walter, Arnaldo, 2003. "Techno-economic analysis of co-fired biomass integrated gasification/combined cycle systems with inclusion of economies of scale," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(12), pages 1229-1258.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:28:y:2003:i:12:p:1229-1258
    DOI: 10.1016/S0360-5442(03)00088-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544203000884
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/S0360-5442(03)00088-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mendonca, Augusto F. & Dahl, Carol, 1999. "The Brazilian electrical system reform," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 73-83, February.
    2. Rodrigues, Monica & Walter, Arnaldo & Faaij, André, 2003. "Co-firing of natural gas and Biomass gas in biomass integrated gasification/combined cycle systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(11), pages 1115-1131.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Al-Kassir, A. & Gañán-Gómez, J. & Mohamad, A.A. & Cuerda-Correa, E.M., 2010. "A study of energy production from cork residues: Sawdust, sandpaper dust and triturated wood," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 382-386.
    2. Gabriele, Alberto, 2004. "Policy alternatives in reforming energy utilities in developing countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(11), pages 1319-1337, July.
    3. Dias, Marina O.S. & Modesto, Marcelo & Ensinas, Adriano V. & Nebra, Silvia A. & Filho, Rubens Maciel & Rossell, Carlos E.V., 2011. "Improving bioethanol production from sugarcane: evaluation of distillation, thermal integration and cogeneration systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 3691-3703.
    4. Copa Rey, José Ramón & Tamayo Pacheco, Jorge Jadid & António da Cruz Tarelho, Luís & Silva, Valter & Cardoso, João Sousa & Silveira, José Luz & Tuna, Celso Eduardo, 2021. "Evaluation of cogeneration alternative systems integrating biomass gasification applied to a Brazilian sugar industry," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 318-333.
    5. Alexandre Evsukoff & Beatriz Lima & Nelson Ebecken, 2011. "Long-Term Runoff Modeling Using Rainfall Forecasts with Application to the Iguaçu River Basin," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 25(3), pages 963-985, February.
    6. Stanislaw Siatkowski & Krzysztof Wacko & Jan Kindracki, 2021. "Experimental Research on Detonation Cell Size of a Purified Biogas-Oxygen Mixture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-13, October.
    7. Dornburg, Veronika & Faaij, André P.C., 2006. "Optimising waste treatment systems," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 227-248.
    8. Gnansounou, Edgard & Dong, Jun, 2004. "Opportunity for inter-regional integration of electricity markets: the case of Shandong and Shanghai in East China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(15), pages 1737-1751, October.
    9. Marbe, Asa & Harvey, Simon, 2006. "Opportunities for integration of biofuel gasifiers in natural-gas combined heat-and-power plants in district-heating systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(7), pages 723-748, July.
    10. Pellegrini, Luiz Felipe & de Oliveira, Silvio, 2007. "Exergy analysis of sugarcane bagasse gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 314-327.
    11. Parisa Kazemiani-Najafabadi & Ehsan Amiri Rad, 2020. "Optimizing the bio/natural gas ratio in a dual-fuel gas turbine (DFGT) through energy-economic, environmental, and renewability analyses," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 5371-5386, August.
    12. Kang, Do Won & Kim, Tong Seop & Hur, Kwang Beom & Park, Jung Keuk, 2012. "The effect of firing biogas on the performance and operating characteristics of simple and recuperative cycle gas turbine combined heat and power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 215-228.
    13. Tolmasquim, Mauricio Tiomno & Cohen, Claude & Szklo, Alexandre Salem, 2001. "CO2 emissions in the Brazilian industrial sector according to the integrated energy planning model (IEPM)," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(8), pages 641-651, June.
    14. Alberto Gabriele, 2004. "Policy Alternatives In Reforming Power Utilities In Developing Countries: A Critical Survey," UNCTAD Discussion Papers 168, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    15. Mendes, Carlos André B. & Beluco, Alexandre & Canales, Fausto Alfredo, 2017. "Some important uncertainties related to climate change in projections for the Brazilian hydropower expansion in the Amazon," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 123-138.
    16. Sunil, & Sinha, Rahul & Chaitanya, Bathina & Rajan, Birendra Kumar & Agarwal, Anurag & Thakur, Ajay D. & Raj, Rishi, 2019. "Design, fabrication, and performance evaluation of a novel biomass-gasification-based hot water generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 148-157.
    17. Pellegrini, Luiz Felipe & de Oliveira Júnior, Silvio & Burbano, Juan Carlos, 2010. "Supercritical steam cycles and biomass integrated gasification combined cycles for sugarcane mills," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 1172-1180.
    18. Corton, Maria Luisa & Zimmermann, Aneliese & Phillips, Michelle Andrea, 2016. "The low cost of quality improvements in the electricity distribution sector of Brazil," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 485-493.
    19. Pihl, Erik & Heyne, Stefan & Thunman, Henrik & Johnsson, Filip, 2010. "Highly efficient electricity generation from biomass by integration and hybridization with combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT) plants for natural gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 4042-4052.
    20. de Souza, Fabio Cavaliere & Legey, Luiz Fernando Loureiro, 2010. "Dynamics of risk management tools and auctions in the second phase of the Brazilian Electricity Market reform," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 1715-1733, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:28:y:2003:i:12:p:1229-1258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.