IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v289y2024ics0360544223031511.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal process selection for natural gas liquids recovery: Energy, exergy, economic, and environmental perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Islam, Muhammad
  • Al-Sobhi, Saad A.
  • Naquash, Ahmad
  • Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul
  • Lee, Moonyong

Abstract

In contrast with extant studies on industrial natural gas liquids (NGL) recovery processes, this study focuses on the most significant configurations, including the industry-standard single-stage (ISS) process, gas subcooled (GSP) process, cold residue gas-recycle (CRR) process, recycle split-vapor (RSV) process, enhanced NGL recovery process (IPSI-1), and internal refrigeration for enhanced NGL recovery process (IPSI-2). Furthermore, this study in-depth analyses the energy, exergy, economics, and environmental factors to determine the optimal configuration based on specific scenarios and priorities. ASPEN HYSYS® V11 is used to simulate six NGL process configurations, each with a processing capacity of 5000 kmol/h. The study identifies critical design variables concerning energy consumption. The energy analysis reveals that the RSV process exhibits the highest energy consumption, totaling 38.00 MW. Additionally, the RSV configuration demonstrates the highest values for exergy destruction, capital cost, CO2 emissions, and purity compared to the other configurations. In contrast, the IPSI-1 process exhibits significantly higher energy efficiency than the RSV process, with 46 % lower energy consumption and the lowest specific CO2 emissions (0.048 kg CO2/kg feed). However, the analytical values for the lowest or middle rankings differ depending on the perspectives considered. Thus, this study provides valuable methods for selecting a conventional technology based on investment, input resources, and sustainable output requirements.

Suggested Citation

  • Islam, Muhammad & Al-Sobhi, Saad A. & Naquash, Ahmad & Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul & Lee, Moonyong, 2024. "Optimal process selection for natural gas liquids recovery: Energy, exergy, economic, and environmental perspectives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:289:y:2024:i:c:s0360544223031511
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.129757
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544223031511
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2023.129757?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yoon, Sekwang & Binns, Michael & Park, Sangmin & Kim, Jin-Kuk, 2017. "Development of energy-efficient processes for natural gas liquids recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 768-775.
    2. Szargut, Jan, 1989. "Chemical exergies of the elements," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 269-286.
    3. Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul & Naquash, Ahmad & Haider, Junaid & Al-Sobhi, Saad A. & Lee, Moonyong, 2022. "State-of-the-art assessment of natural gas liquids recovery processes: Techno-economic evaluation, policy implications, open issues, and the way forward," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    4. Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul & Qadeer, Kinza & Minh, Le Quang & Haider, Junaid & Lee, Moonyong, 2019. "Nitrogen self-recuperation expansion-based process for offshore coproduction of liquefied natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, and pentane plus," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 247-257.
    5. Soltanian, Salman & Kalogirou, Soteris A. & Ranjbari, Meisam & Amiri, Hamid & Mahian, Omid & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Jafary, Tahereh & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Aghaei, Siavash & Pe, 2022. "Exergetic sustainability analysis of municipal solid waste treatment systems: A systematic critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    6. Ren, Jie & Qian, Zuoqin & Fei, Chunguang & Lu, Ding & Zou, Yincai & Xu, Chen & Liu, Lu, 2023. "Thermodynamic, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental analysis of a combined cooling and power system for natural gas-biomass dual fuel gas turbine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    7. Kim, Donghoi & Gundersen, Truls, 2020. "Use of exergy efficiency for the optimization of LNG processes with NGL extraction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bosman, Danforth Brandon & Li, Qing & Kiss, Anton A., 2024. "Enhanced downstream processing of NGL using intensified fluid separation technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul & Naquash, Ahmad & Haider, Junaid & Al-Sobhi, Saad A. & Lee, Moonyong, 2022. "State-of-the-art assessment of natural gas liquids recovery processes: Techno-economic evaluation, policy implications, open issues, and the way forward," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    2. Kim, Donghoi & Gundersen, Truls, 2020. "Use of exergy efficiency for the optimization of LNG processes with NGL extraction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    3. Olusegun David Samuel & Peter A. Aigba & Thien Khanh Tran & H. Fayaz & Carlo Pastore & Oguzhan Der & Ali Erçetin & Christopher C. Enweremadu & Ahmad Mustafa, 2023. "Comparison of the Techno-Economic and Environmental Assessment of Hydrodynamic Cavitation and Mechanical Stirring Reactors for the Production of Sustainable Hevea brasiliensis Ethyl Ester," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-27, November.
    4. Stanek, Wojciech & Czarnowska, Lucyna, 2018. "Thermo-ecological cost – Szargut's proposal on exergy and ecology connection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 1050-1059.
    5. Peralta-Ruiz, Y. & González-Delgado, A.-D. & Kafarov, V., 2013. "Evaluation of alternatives for microalgae oil extraction based on exergy analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 226-236.
    6. Uwitonze, Hosanna & Chaniago, Yus Donald & Lim, Hankwon, 2022. "Novel integrated energy-efficient dual-effect single mixed refrigerant and NGLs recovery process for small-scale natural gas processing plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    7. Chen, B. & Chen, G.Q., 2007. "Modified ecological footprint accounting and analysis based on embodied exergy--a case study of the Chinese society 1981-2001," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2-3), pages 355-376, March.
    8. Elena C. Prenovitz & Peter K. Hazlett & Chandler S. Reilly, 2023. "Can Markets Improve Recycling Performance? A Cross-Country Regression Analysis and Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    9. Hao, Xiaoqing & An, Haizhong & Qi, Hai & Gao, Xiangyun, 2016. "Evolution of the exergy flow network embodied in the global fossil energy trade: Based on complex network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1515-1522.
    10. Chen, G.Q. & Qi, Z.H., 2007. "Systems account of societal exergy utilization: China 2003," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 208(2), pages 102-118.
    11. Khalili-Garakani, Amirhossein & Ivakpour, Javad & Kasiri, Norollah, 2016. "Evolutionary synthesis of optimum light ends recovery unit with exergy analysis application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 507-522.
    12. Dara, Satyadileep & Abdulqader, Haytham & Al Wahedi, Yasser & Berrouk, Abdallah S., 2020. "Countrywide optimization of natural gas supply chain: From wells to consumers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    13. He, Tianbiao & Zhou, Zhongming & Mao, Ning & Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul, 2024. "Transcritical CO2 precooled single mixed refrigerant natural gas liquefaction process: Exergy and Exergoeconomic optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    14. Costantini, Michele & Provolo, Giorgio & Bacenetti, Jacopo, 2024. "The effects of incorporating renewable energy into the environmental footprint of beef production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    15. Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul & Duong, Pham Luu Trung & Minh, Le Quang & Lee, Sanggyu & Lee, Moonyong, 2019. "Dual mixed refrigerant LNG process: Uncertainty quantification and dimensional reduction sensitivity analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 1446-1456.
    16. S. Hamed Fatemi Alavi & Amirreza Javaherian & S. M. S. Mahmoudi & Saeed Soltani & Marc A. Rosen, 2023. "Coupling a Gas Turbine Bottoming Cycle Using CO 2 as the Working Fluid with a Gas Cycle: Exergy Analysis Considering Combustion Chamber Steam Injection," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-25, September.
    17. Amirreza Javaherian & Sadaf Ghasemi & Seyed Mohammad Seyed Mahmoudi & Marc A. Rosen & Mohsen Sadeghi, 2023. "Two-Objective Optimization of a Cogeneration System Based on a Gas Turbine Integrated with Solar-Assisted Rankine and Absorption Refrigeration Cycles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-27, November.
    18. Daniarta, Sindu & Nemś, Magdalena & Kolasiński, Piotr, 2023. "A review on thermal energy storage applicable for low- and medium-temperature organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    19. Nguyen, Tuong-Van & Fülöp, Tamás Gábor & Breuhaus, Peter & Elmegaard, Brian, 2014. "Life performance of oil and gas platforms: Site integration and thermodynamic evaluation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 282-301.
    20. Valero, Alicia & Valero, Antonio & Stanek, Wojciech, 2018. "Assessing the exergy degradation of the natural capital: From Szargut's updated reference environment to the new thermoecological-cost methodology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1140-1149.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:289:y:2024:i:c:s0360544223031511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.