IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v261y2022ipbs0360544222022782.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhanced sludge digestion using anaerobic dynamic membrane bioreactor: Effects of hydraulic retention time

Author

Listed:
  • Wu, Wei
  • Chen, Guang
  • Wang, Zhiwei

Abstract

Performance of conventional anaerobic digestion is limited due to coupling of solid retention time (SRT) and hydraulic retention time (HRT). In this study, the sludge digestion efficiency was enhanced by decoupling SRT and HRT in a pilot-scale anaerobic dynamic membrane bioreactor, with a particular focus on the effects of HRT. With HRT decreased to 10 d, the total solids concentration reached 43.3 g/L in the membrane tank with the influent sludge concentration 23.4 ± 0.7 g/L, while volatile solids (VS) reduction rate and specific biogas production were 41% and 0.59 L/g VS, respectively, achieving simultaneous thickening and digestion of sludge. Microbial community analysis showed that Cloroflexi and Spirochaetota, which had an increased abundance at low HRT, were beneficial to VS reduction and multiple methanogenesis pathways. Methanosaeta, being a strict acetoclastic methanogen dominant at HRT 30 d, decreased in the abundance from 78.4% to 50.7% with HRT changing from 30 d to 10 d. In contrast, the abundance of hydrogenotrophic and methylotrophic methanogens increased from 17.2% to 39.4% with the decrease of HRT, indicating the influence of HRT on methanogenic pathways. Furthermore, the predicted gene analysis confirmed the transformation from dominant acetoclastic methanogenesis to the coexistence of multiple methanogenesis pathways. Finally, the recovered energy from methane increased from 0.43 kWh/kg VS to 0.56 kWh/kg VS as HRT decreased to 10 d from 30 d, and the net energy consumption at HRT of 10 d was 0.47 kWh/kg VS, only 66% of that at HRT of 30 d.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu, Wei & Chen, Guang & Wang, Zhiwei, 2022. "Enhanced sludge digestion using anaerobic dynamic membrane bioreactor: Effects of hydraulic retention time," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:261:y:2022:i:pb:s0360544222022782
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125396
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544222022782
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2022.125396?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lim, Jun Wei & Kelvin Wong, Sheng Wen & Dai, Yanjun & Tong, Yen Wah, 2020. "Effect of seed sludge source and start-up strategy on the performance and microbial communities of thermophilic anaerobic digestion of food waste," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    2. Nges, Ivo Achu & Liu, Jing, 2010. "Effects of solid retention time on anaerobic digestion of dewatered-sewage sludge in mesophilic and thermophilic conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 2200-2206.
    3. Zhen, Guangyin & Lu, Xueqin & Kato, Hiroyuki & Zhao, Youcai & Li, Yu-You, 2017. "Overview of pretreatment strategies for enhancing sewage sludge disintegration and subsequent anaerobic digestion: Current advances, full-scale application and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 559-577.
    4. Ma, Guiling & Chen, Yanting & Ndegwa, Pius, 2021. "Association between methane yield and microbiota abundance in the anaerobic digestion process: A meta-regression," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Le Liu & Yisong Hu & Yi Qu & Dongxing Cheng & Yuan Yang & Rong Chen & Jiayuan Ji, 2023. "Performance Enhancement of an Upflow Anaerobic Dynamic Membrane Bioreactor via Granular Activated Carbon Addition for Domestic Wastewater Treatment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiao, Benyi & Tang, Xinyi & Zhang, Wenzhe & Zhang, Ke & Yang, Tang & Han, Yunping & Liu, Junxin, 2022. "Effects of rice straw ratio on mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of swine manure and rice straw mixture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    2. Wang, Hui & Zeng, Shufang & Pan, Xiaoli & Liu, Lei & Chen, Yunjie & Tang, Jiawei & Luo, Feng, 2022. "Bioelectrochemically assisting anaerobic digestion enhanced methane production under low-temperature," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 1071-1083.
    3. Huang, Bao-Cheng & He, Chuan-Shu & Fan, Nian-Si & Jin, Ren-Cun & Yu, Han-Qing, 2020. "Envisaging wastewater-to-energy practices for sustainable urban water pollution control: Current achievements and future prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    4. Luo, Jingyang & Feng, Leiyu & Zhang, Wei & Li, Xiang & Chen, Hong & Wang, Dongbo & Chen, Yinguang, 2014. "Improved production of short-chain fatty acids from waste activated sludge driven by carbohydrate addition in continuous-flow reactors: Influence of SRT and temperature," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 51-58.
    5. Chen, Yi-di & Li, Suping & Ho, Shih-Hsin & Wang, Chengyu & Lin, Yen-Chang & Nagarajan, Dillirani & Chang, Jo-Shu & Ren, Nan-qi, 2018. "Integration of sludge digestion and microalgae cultivation for enhancing bioenergy and biorefinery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 76-90.
    6. Singh, Renu & Shukla, Ashish, 2014. "A review on methods of flue gas cleaning from combustion of biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 854-864.
    7. Di Maria, Francesco & Sordi, Alessio & Cirulli, Giuseppe & Micale, Caterina, 2015. "Amount of energy recoverable from an existing sludge digester with the co-digestion with fruit and vegetable waste at reduced retention time," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 9-14.
    8. Meng, Xingyao & Wang, Qingping & Zhao, Xixi & Cai, Yafan & Ma, Xuguang & Fu, Jingyi & Wang, Pan & Wang, Yongjing & Liu, Wei & Ren, Lianhai, 2023. "A review of the technologies used for preserving anaerobic digestion inoculum," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    9. Mahsa Nabizadeh Mashizi & Mohammad Hossein Bagheripour & Mohammad Mostafa Jafari & Ehsan Yaghoubi, 2023. "Mechanical and Microstructural Properties of a Stabilized Sand Using Geopolymer Made of Wastes and a Natural Pozzolan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    10. Cristiane Romio & Michael Vedel Wegener Kofoed & Henrik Bjarne Møller, 2021. "Digestate Post-Treatment Strategies for Additional Biogas Recovery: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-27, August.
    11. Ruffino, Barbara & Cerutti, Alberto & Campo, Giuseppe & Scibilia, Gerardo & Lorenzi, Eugenio & Zanetti, Mariachiara, 2019. "Improvement of energy recovery from the digestion of waste activated sludge (WAS) through intermediate treatments: The effect of the hydraulic retention time (HRT) of the first-stage digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 191-204.
    12. Hosseini Koupaie, E. & Lin, L. & Bazyar Lakeh, A.A. & Azizi, A. & Dhar, B.R. & Hafez, H. & Elbeshbishy, E., 2021. "Performance evaluation and microbial community analysis of mesophilic and thermophilic sludge fermentation processes coupled with thermal hydrolysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    13. Ma, Guiling & Chen, Yanting & Ndegwa, Pius, 2021. "Association between methane yield and microbiota abundance in the anaerobic digestion process: A meta-regression," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    14. Yu, Lu & Yuan, Haiping & Zhu, Nanwen & Shen, Yanwen, 2021. "How does choline change methanogenesis pathway in anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    15. Magdalena Budych-Gorzna & Beata Szatkowska & Lukasz Jaroszynski & Bjarne Paulsrud & Ewelina Jankowska & Tymoteusz Jaroszynski & Piotr Oleskowicz-Popiel, 2021. "Towards an Energy Self-Sufficient Resource Recovery Facility by Improving Energy and Economic Balance of a Municipal WWTP with Chemically Enhanced Primary Treatment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, March.
    16. Yin, Changkai & Shen, Yanwen & Zhu, Nanwen & Huang, Qiujie & Lou, Ziyang & Yuan, Haiping, 2018. "Anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge with incineration bottom ash: Enhanced methane production and CO2 sequestration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 503-511.
    17. Jiang, Y. & Xie, S.H. & Dennehy, C. & Lawlor, P.G. & Hu, Z.H. & Wu, G.X. & Zhan, X.M. & Gardiner, G.E., 2020. "Inactivation of pathogens in anaerobic digestion systems for converting biowastes to bioenergy: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    18. Di Capua, Francesco & Spasiano, Danilo & Giordano, Andrea & Adani, Fabrizio & Fratino, Umberto & Pirozzi, Francesco & Esposito, Giovanni, 2020. "High-solid anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge: challenges and opportunities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    19. Mohd Imran Siddiqui & Izharul Haq Farooqi & Farrukh Basheer & Hasan Rameez & Mohamed Hasnain Isa, 2023. "Pretreatment of Slaughterhouse Effluent Treatment Plant Sludge Using Electro-Fenton Process for Anaerobic Digestion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    20. Negri, Camilla & Ricci, Marina & Zilio, Massimo & D'Imporzano, Giuliana & Qiao, Wei & Dong, Renjie & Adani, Fabrizio, 2020. "Anaerobic digestion of food waste for bio-energy production in China and Southeast Asia: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:261:y:2022:i:pb:s0360544222022782. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.