IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v205y2020ics0360544220309373.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technoeconomic analysis of a waste tire to liquefied synthetic natural gas (SNG) energy system

Author

Listed:
  • Subramanian, Avinash S.R.
  • Gundersen, Truls
  • Adams, Thomas A.

Abstract

Thermochemical conversion of solid wastes through gasification offers the dual benefit of production of high-value fuels and environmentally friendly waste disposal. In this paper, we propose a novel process for production of liquefied synthetic natural gas (SNG) from waste tires via a rotary kiln gasification process. We use a combination of experimental data available in the open literature, first principles mathematical models and empirical models to study three design cases (without CO2 Capture and Sequestration (CCS), with precombustion CCS and with pre- and postcombustion CCS) in two locations (USA and Norway). The thermodynamic, economic and environmental performance of the concept is studied. The results show that minimum selling prices of 16.7, 17.5 and 19.9 $/GJLHV,SNG are required for USA and 20.9, 21.8 and 24.9 $/GJLHV,SNG for Norway. We note that these prices may become competitive under certain regulatory conditions (such as recent public policy movement in British Columbia, Canada requiring public utilities to purchase natural gas made from renewables at prices up to 30 $/GJLHV,SNG). The minimum selling price reduces substantially with process scale and with levying tipping fees. The design situated in Norway with both pre- and post-combustion CCS has near zero direct and indirect CO2 emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Subramanian, Avinash S.R. & Gundersen, Truls & Adams, Thomas A., 2020. "Technoeconomic analysis of a waste tire to liquefied synthetic natural gas (SNG) energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:205:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220309373
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117830
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544220309373
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117830?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Watson, Harry A.J. & Vikse, Matias & Gundersen, Truls & Barton, Paul I., 2018. "Optimization of single mixed-refrigerant natural gas liquefaction processes described by nondifferentiable models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 860-876.
    2. Okeke, Ikenna J. & Adams, Thomas A., 2018. "Combining petroleum coke and natural gas for efficient liquid fuels production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 426-442.
    3. Er-rbib, Hanaâ & Bouallou, Chakib, 2014. "Modeling and simulation of CO methanation process for renewable electricity storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 81-88.
    4. Martínez, Juan Daniel & Puy, Neus & Murillo, Ramón & García, Tomás & Navarro, María Victoria & Mastral, Ana Maria, 2013. "Waste tyre pyrolysis – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 179-213.
    5. Congressional Budget Office, 2010. "Using Biofuel Tax Credits to Achieve Energy and Environmental Policy Goals," Reports 21444, Congressional Budget Office.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Santa Margarida Santos & Ana Carolina Assis & Leandro Gomes & Catarina Nobre & Paulo Brito, 2022. "Waste Gasification Technologies: A Brief Overview," Waste, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-26, December.
    2. Omojola Awogbemi & Daramy Vandi Von Kallon & Kazeem Aderemi Bello, 2022. "Resource Recycling with the Aim of Achieving Zero-Waste Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Subramanian, Avinash S.R. & Gundersen, Truls & Adams, Thomas A., 2021. "Optimal design and operation of a waste tire feedstock polygeneration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    4. Subramanian, Avinash S.R. & Gundersen, Truls & Barton, Paul I. & Adams, Thomas A., 2022. "Global optimization of a hybrid waste tire and natural gas feedstock polygeneration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    5. Song, Weiming & Zhou, Jianan & Li, Yujie & Li, Shu & Yang, Jian, 2021. "Utilization of waste tire powder for gaseous fuel generation via CO2 gasification using waste heat in converter vaporization cooling flue," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 283-296.
    6. Dmitry Porshnov, 2022. "Evolution of pyrolysis and gasification as waste to energy tools for low carbon economy," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(1), January.
    7. Subramanian, Avinash S.R. & Kannan, Rohit & Holtorf, Flemming & Adams, Thomas A. & Gundersen, Truls & Barton, Paul I., 2023. "Optimization under uncertainty of a hybrid waste tire and natural gas feedstock flexible polygeneration system using a decomposition algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Subramanian, Avinash S.R. & Gundersen, Truls & Adams, Thomas A., 2021. "Optimal design and operation of a waste tire feedstock polygeneration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    2. Katla, Daria & Bartela, Łukasz & Skorek-Osikowska, Anna, 2020. "Evaluation of electricity generation subsystem of power-to-gas-to-power unit using gas expander and heat recovery steam generator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    3. Jouhara, H. & Nannou, T.K. & Anguilano, L. & Ghazal, H. & Spencer, N., 2017. "Heat pipe based municipal waste treatment unit for home energy recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1210-1230.
    4. Moon, Hyeong-Bin & Lee, Ji-Hwan & Kim, Hyung-Tae & Lee, Jin-Wook & Lee, Byoung-Hwa & Jeon, Chung-Hwan, 2024. "Effect of high-pressure pyrolysis on syngas and char structure of petroleum coke," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    5. Michael Bampaou & Kyriakos Panopoulos & Panos Seferlis & Spyridon Voutetakis & Ismael Matino & Alice Petrucciani & Antonella Zaccara & Valentina Colla & Stefano Dettori & Teresa Annunziata Branca & Vi, 2021. "Integration of Renewable Hydrogen Production in Steelworks Off-Gases for the Synthesis of Methanol and Methane," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-24, May.
    6. Policella, Matteo & Wang, Zhiwei & Burra, Kiran. G. & Gupta, Ashwani K., 2019. "Characteristics of syngas from pyrolysis and CO2-assisted gasification of waste tires," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    7. Budny, Christoph & Madlener, Reinhard & Hilgers, Christoph, 2013. "Economic Feasibility of Pipeline and Underground Reservoir Storage Options for Power-to-Gas Load Balancing," FCN Working Papers 18/2013, E.ON Energy Research Center, Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior (FCN).
    8. Wu, Wei & Taipabu, Muhammad Ikhsan & Chang, Wei-Chen & Viswanathan, Karthickeyan & Xie, Yi-Lin & Kuo, Po-Chih, 2022. "Economic dispatch of torrefied biomass polygeneration systems considering power/SNG grid demands," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 707-719.
    9. Yi, Qun & Gong, Min-Hui & Huang, Yi & Feng, Jie & Hao, Yan-Hong & Zhang, Ji-Long & Li, Wen-Ying, 2016. "Process development of coke oven gas to methanol integrated with CO2 recycle for satisfactory techno-economic performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 618-628.
    10. Campuzano, Felipe & Brown, Robert C. & Martínez, Juan Daniel, 2019. "Auger reactors for pyrolysis of biomass and wastes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 372-409.
    11. Choi, Gyung-Goo & Oh, Seung-Jin & Kim, Joo-Sik, 2016. "Non-catalytic pyrolysis of scrap tires using a newly developed two-stage pyrolyzer for the production of a pyrolysis oil with a low sulfur content," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 140-147.
    12. Maura Allaire and Stephen P. A. Brown, 2015. "The Green Paradox of U.S. Biofuel Subsidies: Impact on Greenhouse Gas Emissions," Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2).
    13. William G. Gale & Samuel Brown, 2013. "Tax Reform for Growth, Equity, and Revenue," Public Finance Review, , vol. 41(6), pages 721-754, November.
    14. Zhang, Pengchao & Hu, Hongyun & Tang, Hua & Yang, Yuhan & Liu, Huan & Lu, Qiang & Li, Xian & Worasuwannarak, Nakorn & Yao, Hong, 2019. "In-depth experimental study of pyrolysis characteristics of raw and cooking treated shrimp shell samples," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 730-738.
    15. Žvar Baškovič, Urban & Vihar, Rok & Seljak, Tine & Katrašnik, Tomaž, 2017. "Feasibility analysis of 100% tire pyrolysis oil in a common rail Diesel engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 980-990.
    16. Tak, Kyungjae & Choi, Jiwon & Ryu, Jun-Hyung & Moon, Il, 2020. "Sensitivity analysis of effects of design parameters and decision variables on optimization of natural gas liquefaction process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    17. Zhang, Menghui & Qi, Yongfeng & Zhang, Wan & Wang, Meiting & Li, Jingyi & Lu, Yi & Zhang, Sheng & He, Jiazheng & Cao, Hao & Tao, Xuan & Xu, Hanlu & Zhang, Sheng, 2024. "A review on waste tires pyrolysis for energy and material recovery from the optimization perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    18. Hita, Idoia & Arabiourrutia, Miriam & Olazar, Martin & Bilbao, Javier & Arandes, José María & Castaño, Pedro, 2016. "Opportunities and barriers for producing high quality fuels from the pyrolysis of scrap tires," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 745-759.
    19. Santos, Lucas F. & Costa, Caliane B.B. & Caballero, José A. & Ravagnani, Mauro A.S.S., 2023. "Multi-objective simulation–optimization via kriging surrogate models applied to natural gas liquefaction process design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    20. Vikse, Matias & Watson, Harry A.J. & Kim, Donghoi & Barton, Paul I. & Gundersen, Truls, 2020. "Optimization of a dual mixed refrigerant process using a nonsmooth approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:205:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220309373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.