IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v202y2020ics0360544220307118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy and cost estimates for separating and capturing CO2 from CO2/H2O using condensation coupled with pressure/vacuum swing adsorption

Author

Listed:
  • Lu, Junhui
  • Cao, Haishan
  • Li, JunMing

Abstract

Condensation coupled with pressure swing adsorption (CPSA) and condensation coupled with vacuum swing adsorption (CVSA) were used to separate CO2 from CO2/H2O mixtures. Six methods are compared using numerical simulations in terms of the energy consumption, separation efficiency and total annual costs for separating CO2/H2O mixtures. The effects of inlet CO2 mole fraction, mass flow rate, and pressure on the total annual cost are also studied. A parametric study shows that the total annual costs of all these methods increase as the CO2 mole fraction and mass flow rate increase and decrease with increasing inlet gas pressure. In addition, for CO2/H2O mixtures with inlet pressure of 10 kPa, mass flow rate of 40 kg/s, and CO2 mole fraction of 0.1, the average heat rejection of the CPSA processes is higher than that of the CVSA process. Although the CPSA recovery (90.02%) is much lower than that of CVSA (96.26%), the H2O remove efficiencies of Adsorption for CPSA and CVSA are very close, because that the remained amount of H2O before Adsorption is very little. A type of CVSA named CcCVSA has the lowest total annual cost with this being the recommended system.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu, Junhui & Cao, Haishan & Li, JunMing, 2020. "Energy and cost estimates for separating and capturing CO2 from CO2/H2O using condensation coupled with pressure/vacuum swing adsorption," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:202:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220307118
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117604
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544220307118
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117604?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zare, V. & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Yari, M., 2013. "An exergoeconomic investigation of waste heat recovery from the Gas Turbine-Modular Helium Reactor (GT-MHR) employing an ammonia–water power/cooling cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 397-409.
    2. Ben-Mansour, R. & Habib, M.A. & Bamidele, O.E. & Basha, M. & Qasem, N.A.A. & Peedikakkal, A. & Laoui, T. & Ali, M., 2016. "Carbon capture by physical adsorption: Materials, experimental investigations and numerical modeling and simulations – A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 225-255.
    3. Wang, Xurong & Dai, Yiping, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis of utilizing the transcritical CO2 cycle and the ORC for a recompression supercritical CO2 cycle waste heat recovery: A comparative study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 193-207.
    4. Kim, Young Jun & Nam, Young Suk & Kang, Yong Tae, 2015. "Study on a numerical model and PSA (pressure swing adsorption) process experiment for CH4/CO2 separation from biogas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 732-741.
    5. Cayer, Emmanuel & Galanis, Nicolas & Desilets, Martin & Nesreddine, Hakim & Roy, Philippe, 2009. "Analysis of a carbon dioxide transcritical power cycle using a low temperature source," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(7-8), pages 1055-1063, July.
    6. Qasem, Naef A.A. & Ben-Mansour, Rached, 2018. "Adsorption breakthrough and cycling stability of carbon dioxide separation from CO2/N2/H2O mixture under ambient conditions using 13X and Mg-MOF-74," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 1093-1107.
    7. Chen, Zhewen & Zhang, Xiaosong & Han, Wei & Gao, Lin & Li, Sheng, 2018. "A power generation system with integrated supercritical water gasification of coal and CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 723-730.
    8. Kvamsdal, Hanne M. & Jordal, Kristin & Bolland, Olav, 2007. "A quantitative comparison of gas turbine cycles with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 10-24.
    9. Akbari, Ata D. & Mahmoudi, Seyed M.S., 2014. "Thermoeconomic analysis & optimization of the combined supercritical CO2 (carbon dioxide) recompression Brayton/organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 501-512.
    10. Chen, Zhewen & Gao, Lin & Zhang, Xiaosong & Han, Wei & Li, Sheng, 2018. "High-efficiency power generation system with integrated supercritical water gasification of coal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 810-816.
    11. Qasem, Naef A.A. & Ben-Mansour, Rached, 2018. "Energy and productivity efficient vacuum pressure swing adsorption process to separate CO2 from CO2/N2 mixture using Mg-MOF-74: A CFD simulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 190-202.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Shun-sen & Wu, Chuang & Li, Jun, 2018. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of single-pressure single-stage and multi-stage CO2 transcritical power cycles for engine waste heat recovery: A comparative study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 559-577.
    2. Zhang, Yuan & Liang, Tianyang & Yang, Ke, 2022. "An integrated energy storage system consisting of Compressed Carbon dioxide energy storage and Organic Rankine Cycle: Exergoeconomic evaluation and multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    3. Crespi, Francesco & Gavagnin, Giacomo & Sánchez, David & Martínez, Gonzalo S., 2017. "Supercritical carbon dioxide cycles for power generation: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 152-183.
    4. Wang, Xurong & Dai, Yiping, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis of utilizing the transcritical CO2 cycle and the ORC for a recompression supercritical CO2 cycle waste heat recovery: A comparative study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 193-207.
    5. Tozlu, Alperen & Abuşoğlu, Ayşegül & Özahi, Emrah, 2018. "Thermoeconomic analysis and optimization of a Re-compression supercritical CO2 cycle using waste heat of Gaziantep Municipal Solid Waste Power Plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 168-180.
    6. Rovira, Antonio & Muñoz, Marta & Sánchez, Consuelo & Martínez-Val, José María, 2015. "Proposal and study of a balanced hybrid Rankine–Brayton cycle for low-to-moderate temperature solar power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 305-317.
    7. Liu, Yaping & Wang, Ying & Huang, Diangui, 2019. "Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle: A state-of-the-art review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    8. Wang, Yanhong & Cao, Lihua & Li, Xingcan & Wang, Jiaxing & Hu, Pengfei & Li, Bo & Li, Yong, 2020. "A novel thermodynamic method and insight of heat transfer characteristics on economizer for supercritical thermal power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    9. Miao, Xinyu & Zhang, Haochun & Ma, Fangwei & Deng, MingHao & You, Ersheng, 2024. "Thermodynamic, exergoeconomic evaluation and optimization of S–N2O/t-N2O nuclear power cycle for the construction of the lunar base," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    10. Seyed Mohammad Seyed Mahmoudi & Ramin Ghiami Sardroud & Mohsen Sadeghi & Marc A. Rosen, 2022. "Integration of Supercritical CO 2 Recompression Brayton Cycle with Organic Rankine/Flash and Kalina Cycles: Thermoeconomic Comparison," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-29, July.
    11. Wang, Xurong & Yang, Yi & Zheng, Ya & Dai, Yiping, 2017. "Exergy and exergoeconomic analyses of a supercritical CO2 cycle for a cogeneration application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 971-982.
    12. Benim, Ali Cemal & Pfeiffelmann, Björn & Ocłoń, Paweł & Taler, Jan, 2019. "Computational investigation of a lifted hydrogen flame with LES and FGM," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 1172-1181.
    13. Xu, Jialing & Rong, Siqi & Sun, Jingli & Peng, Zhiyong & Jin, Hui & Guo, Liejin & Zhang, Xiang & Zhou, Teng, 2022. "Optimal design of non-isothermal supercritical water gasification reactor: From biomass to hydrogen," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    14. Wang, Xiaohe & Liu, Qibin & Bai, Zhang & Lei, Jing & Jin, Hongguang, 2018. "Thermodynamic investigations of the supercritical CO2 system with solar energy and biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 108-118.
    15. Xue, Xiaodong & Liu, Changchun & Han, Wei & Wang, Zefeng & Zhang, Na & Jin, Hongguang & Wang, Xiaodong, 2023. "Proposal and investigation of a high-efficiency coal-fired power generation system enabled by chemical recuperative supercritical water coal gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    16. Lin, Junhao & Sun, Shichang & Cui, Chongwei & Ma, Rui & Fang, Lin & Zhang, Peixin & Quan, Zonggang & Song, Xin & Yan, Jianglong & Luo, Juan, 2019. "Hydrogen-rich bio-gas generation and optimization in relation to heavy metals immobilization during Pd-catalyzed supercritical water gasification of sludge," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    17. Battisti, Felipe G. & Cardemil, José M. & da Silva, Alexandre K., 2016. "A multivariable optimization of a Brayton power cycle operating with CO2 as working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 908-916.
    18. Muñoz, Marta & Rovira, Antonio & Sánchez, Consuelo & Montes, María José, 2017. "Off-design analysis of a Hybrid Rankine-Brayton cycle used as the power block of a solar thermal power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 369-381.
    19. Cao, Yan & Habibi, Hamed & Zoghi, Mohammad & Raise, Amir, 2021. "Waste heat recovery of a combined regenerative gas turbine - recompression supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle driven by a hybrid solar-biomass heat source for multi-generation purpose: 4E analysis and pa," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    20. Guo, Shenghui & Meng, Fanrui & Peng, Pai & Xu, Jialing & Jin, Hui & Chen, Yunan & Guo, Liejin, 2022. "Thermodynamic analysis of the superiority of the direct mass transfer design in the supercritical water gasification system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:202:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220307118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.