IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v200y2020ics0360544220306563.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Possibilities for CCUS in medium temperature geothermal reservoir

Author

Listed:
  • Vulin, Domagoj
  • Muhasilović, Lejla
  • Arnaut, Maja

Abstract

Based on the hypothetical structure, a 3D numerical simulation model was created to examine the flow characteristics of a geothermal field. According to the known dimensions, assumption of existing fault and petrophysical properties, the model can relate to the properties of Velika Ciglena geothermal reservoir, and thus the simulation results of heat flow (reservoir cooling due to reinjection of cooled water), wellbore injectivity and productivity are comparable with previously published data related to the same field. This simulation model for a geothermal reservoir of such structure has been made for the first time and was complemented by an analysis of possible CO2 injection. It has been established that the effect of CO2 storage is significant until CO2 reaches the production well (first two years). The effect of pressure relief on the CO2 injection well has been achieved because of simultaneous injection and production and due to an increase in CO2 saturation which had consequently induced an increase of the effective permeability for CO2. The effect of reservoir cooling is shown, which is significant only when the water is injected, while in the case of injection and production of CO2, this effect does not reflect on the temperature of the produced fluid.

Suggested Citation

  • Vulin, Domagoj & Muhasilović, Lejla & Arnaut, Maja, 2020. "Possibilities for CCUS in medium temperature geothermal reservoir," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:200:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220306563
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117549
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544220306563
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117549?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guzović, Zvonimir & Majcen, Boris & Cvetković, Svetislav, 2012. "Possibilities of electricity generation in the Republic of Croatia from medium-temperature geothermal sources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 404-414.
    2. Mohammadzadeh Bina, Saeid & Jalilinasrabady, Saeid & Fujii, Hikari, 2017. "Energy, economic and environmental (3E) aspects of internal heat exchanger for ORC geothermal power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 1096-1106.
    3. Teng, Lin & Li, Yuxing & Hu, Qihui & Zhang, Datong & Ye, Xiao & Gu, Shuaiwei & Wang, Cailin, 2018. "Experimental study of near-field structure and thermo-hydraulics of supercritical CO2 releases," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 806-814.
    4. Guzović, Zvonimir & Rašković, Predrag & Blatarić, Zoran, 2014. "The comparision of a basic and a dual-pressure ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle): Geothermal Power Plant Velika Ciglena case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 175-186.
    5. Sun, Liang & Chen, Wenying, 2017. "Development and application of a multi-stage CCUS source–sink matching model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P2), pages 1424-1432.
    6. Pasqualetti, M.J., 1980. "Geothermal energy and the environment: The global experience," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 111-165.
    7. Guzović, Z. & Lončar, D. & Ferdelji, N., 2010. "Possibilities of electricity generation in the Republic of Croatia by means of geothermal energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 3429-3440.
    8. Tapia, John Frederick D. & Lee, Jui-Yuan & Ooi, Raymond E.H. & Foo, Dominic C.Y. & Tan, Raymond R., 2016. "Optimal CO2 allocation and scheduling in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) operations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 337-345.
    9. Finster, Molly & Clark, Corrie & Schroeder, Jenna & Martino, Louis, 2015. "Geothermal produced fluids: Characteristics, treatment technologies, and management options," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 952-966.
    10. Yekoladio, P.J. & Bello-Ochende, T. & Meyer, J.P., 2013. "Design and optimization of a downhole coaxial heat exchanger for an enhanced geothermal system (EGS)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 128-137.
    11. Rašković, Predrag & Guzović, Zvonimir & Cvetković, Svetislav, 2013. "Performance analysis of electricity generation by the medium temperature geothermal resources: Velika Ciglena case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 11-31.
    12. Borović, Staša & Marković, Izidora, 2015. "Utilization and tourism valorisation of geothermal waters in Croatia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 52-63.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wu, Lin & Hou, Zhengmeng & Luo, Zhifeng & Huang, Liangchao & Xiong, Ying & Mehmood, Faisal & Liu, Jianhua & Sun, Wei & Xie, Yachen, 2023. "Efficiency assessment of underground biomethanation with hydrogen and carbon dioxide in depleted gas reservoirs: A biogeochemical simulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Inkyu & Tester, Jefferson William & You, Fengqi, 2019. "Systems analysis, design, and optimization of geothermal energy systems for power production and polygeneration: State-of-the-art and future challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 551-577.
    2. Zhao, Yajing & Wang, Jiangfeng, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a flash-binary geothermal power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 159-170.
    3. Guzović, Zvonimir & Rašković, Predrag & Blatarić, Zoran, 2014. "The comparision of a basic and a dual-pressure ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle): Geothermal Power Plant Velika Ciglena case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 175-186.
    4. Rašković, Predrag & Guzović, Zvonimir & Cvetković, Svetislav, 2013. "Performance analysis of electricity generation by the medium temperature geothermal resources: Velika Ciglena case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 11-31.
    5. Shokati, Naser & Ranjbar, Faramarz & Yari, Mortaza, 2015. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of basic, dual-pressure and dual-fluid ORCs and Kalina geothermal power plants: A comparative study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 527-542.
    6. Fan, Jing-Li & Shen, Shuo & Wei, Shi-Jie & Xu, Mao & Zhang, Xian, 2020. "Near-term CO2 storage potential for coal-fired power plants in China: A county-level source-sink matching assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    7. Buonomano, Annamaria & Calise, Francesco & Palombo, Adolfo & Vicidomini, Maria, 2015. "Energy and economic analysis of geothermal–solar trigeneration systems: A case study for a hotel building in Ischia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 224-241.
    8. Pan, Shu-Yuan & Gao, Mengyao & Shah, Kinjal J. & Zheng, Jianming & Pei, Si-Lu & Chiang, Pen-Chi, 2019. "Establishment of enhanced geothermal energy utilization plans: Barriers and strategies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 19-32.
    9. Zhai, Huixing & Shi, Lin & An, Qingsong, 2014. "Influence of working fluid properties on system performance and screen evaluation indicators for geothermal ORC (organic Rankine cycle) system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 2-11.
    10. Alvin Kiprono Bett & Saeid Jalilinasrabady, 2021. "Optimization of ORC Power Plants for Geothermal Application in Kenya by Combining Exergy and Pinch Point Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    11. Migo-Sumagang, Maria Victoria & Tan, Raymond R. & Aviso, Kathleen B., 2023. "A multi-period model for optimizing negative emission technology portfolios with economic and carbon value discount rates," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    12. Tomislav Malvić & Uroš Barudžija & Borivoje Pašić & Josip Ivšinović, 2021. "Small Unconventional Hydrocarbon Gas Reservoirs as Challenging Energy Sources, Case Study from Northern Croatia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, June.
    13. Mohammadzadeh Bina, Saeid & Jalilinasrabady, Saeid & Fujii, Hikari & Pambudi, Nugroho Agung, 2018. "Classification of geothermal resources in Indonesia by applying exergy concept," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 499-506.
    14. Gordon, David & Bolisetti, Tirupati & Ting, David S-K. & Reitsma, Stanley, 2018. "Experimental and analytical investigation on pipe sizes for a coaxial borehole heat exchanger," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 946-953.
    15. Włodarski, Wojciech, 2018. "Experimental investigations and simulations of the microturbine unit with permanent magnet generator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 59-71.
    16. Macenić, M. & Kurevija, T. & Medved, I., 2020. "Novel geothermal gradient map of the Croatian part of the Pannonian Basin System based on data interpretation from 154 deep exploration wells," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    17. Wang, Peng-Tao & Wei, Yi-Ming & Yang, Bo & Li, Jia-Quan & Kang, Jia-Ning & Liu, Lan-Cui & Yu, Bi-Ying & Hou, Yun-Bing & Zhang, Xian, 2020. "Carbon capture and storage in China’s power sector: Optimal planning under the 2 °C constraint," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    18. Zhang, Shuai & Liu, Linlin & Zhang, Lei & Zhuang, Yu & Du, Jian, 2018. "An optimization model for carbon capture utilization and storage supply chain: A case study in Northeastern China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 194-206.
    19. Zhou, Xiao & Cai, Yangchao & Li, Xuetao, 2024. "Process arrangement and multi-aspect study of a novel environmentally-friendly multigeneration plant relying on a geothermal-based plant combined with the goswami cycle booted by kalina and desalinati," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    20. Liu, Qiang & Shang, Linlin & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2016. "Performance analyses of a hybrid geothermal–fossil power generation system using low-enthalpy geothermal resources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 149-162.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:200:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220306563. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.