IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v198y2020ics0360544220304758.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of H2 addition on the microbial community structure of a mesophilic anaerobic digestion system

Author

Listed:
  • Zhu, Xianpu
  • Chen, Liumeng
  • Chen, Yichao
  • Cao, Qin
  • Liu, Xiaofeng
  • Li, Dong

Abstract

In situ biogas upgrading by H2 addition is a promising technology to increase the calorific value of biogas；however, its effects on microbial community structure remain unclear. Therefore, mesophilic digestion of swine manure was carried out in a reactor with an H2 addition rate of 7.2 mL/min (at a 4:1H2: CO2 ratio) and an organic loading rate of 2.0 g of volatile solids (VS)/(L∙d). After H2 was injected into the reactor, the maximum average methane yield increased from 189 to 245 L/kg VS under intermittent mixing conditions. The acetate concentration increased to a maximum of 1600 mg/L but the methane yield was reduced to 210 L/kg VS, which was attributed to a reduction in acetoclastic methanogen abundance in the system due to continuous mixing. The combination of homoacetogenic Clostridium and the Methanosaeta acetoclastic methanogens instead of hydrogenotrophic methanogens appears to have played a vital role in converting the added H2 into CH4 in the mesophilic reactor. However, hydrogenotrophic methanogens accounted for approximately 10% of the total metabolic activity while having a relative abundance of less than 0.5% among the methanogens, after the acetoclastic were inhibited.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhu, Xianpu & Chen, Liumeng & Chen, Yichao & Cao, Qin & Liu, Xiaofeng & Li, Dong, 2020. "Effect of H2 addition on the microbial community structure of a mesophilic anaerobic digestion system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:198:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220304758
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117368
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544220304758
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117368?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Budzianowski, Wojciech M. & Budzianowska, Dominika A., 2015. "Economic analysis of biomethane and bioelectricity generation from biogas using different support schemes and plant configurations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 658-666.
    2. Leme, Rodrigo Marcelo & Seabra, Joaquim E.A., 2017. "Technical-economic assessment of different biogas upgrading routes from vinasse anaerobic digestion in the Brazilian bioethanol industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 754-766.
    3. Kirchbacher, Florian & Biegger, Philipp & Miltner, Martin & Lehner, Markus & Harasek, Michael, 2018. "A new methanation and membrane based power-to-gas process for the direct integration of raw biogas – Feasability and comparison," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 34-46.
    4. Tippayawong, N. & Thanompongchart, P., 2010. "Biogas quality upgrade by simultaneous removal of CO2 and H2S in a packed column reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 4531-4535.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lane, Blake & Kinnon, Michael Mac & Shaffer, Brendan & Samuelsen, Scott, 2022. "Deployment planning tool for environmentally sensitive heavy-duty vehicles and fueling infrastructure," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    2. Zheng, Lei & Cheng, Shikun & Han, Yanzhao & Wang, Min & Xiang, Yue & Guo, Jiali & Cai, Di & Mang, Heinz-Peter & Dong, Taili & Li, Zifu & Yan, Zhengxu & Men, Yu, 2020. "Bio-natural gas industry in China: Current status and development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    3. Shane, Agabu & Gheewala, Shabbir H. & Phiri, Seveliano, 2017. "Rural domestic biogas supply model for Zambia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 683-697.
    4. Leme, Rodrigo Marcelo & Seabra, Joaquim E.A., 2017. "Technical-economic assessment of different biogas upgrading routes from vinasse anaerobic digestion in the Brazilian bioethanol industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 754-766.
    5. Jemni, Mohamed Ali & Kantchev, Gueorgui & Abid, Mohamed Salah, 2011. "Influence of intake manifold design on in-cylinder flow and engine performances in a bus diesel engine converted to LPG gas fuelled, using CFD analyses and experimental investigations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 2701-2715.
    6. Andrea Barbaresi & Mirko Morini & Agostino Gambarotta, 2022. "Review on the Status of the Research on Power-to-Gas Experimental Activities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-32, August.
    7. Huang, Haiping & Zhang, Hong & Han, Denglin, 2021. "Ferrocene addition for suppression of hydrogen sulfide formation during thermal recovery of oil sand bitumen," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    8. Carolinne Secco & Maria Eduarda Kounaris Fuziki & Angelo Marcelo Tusset & Giane Gonçalves Lenzi, 2023. "Reactive Processes for H 2 S Removal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-14, February.
    9. Khan, Muhammad Usman & Lee, Jonathan Tian En & Bashir, Muhammad Aamir & Dissanayake, Pavani Dulanja & Ok, Yong Sik & Tong, Yen Wah & Shariati, Mohammad Ali & Wu, Sarah & Ahring, Birgitte Kiaer, 2021. "Current status of biogas upgrading for direct biomethane use: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    10. Bedoić, Robert & Dorotić, Hrvoje & Schneider, Daniel Rolph & Čuček, Lidija & Ćosić, Boris & Pukšec, Tomislav & Duić, Neven, 2021. "Synergy between feedstock gate fee and power-to-gas: An energy and economic analysis of renewable methane production in a biogas plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 12-23.
    11. Lidia Lombardi & Barbara Mendecka & Simone Fabrizi, 2020. "Solar Integrated Anaerobic Digester: Energy Savings and Economics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-16, August.
    12. Yan, Cheng & Zheng, Zheng, 2014. "Performance of mixed LED light wavelengths on biogas upgrade and biogas fluid removal by microalga Chlorella sp," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1008-1014.
    13. Claudinei De Souza Guimarães & David Rodrigues da Silva Maia & Eduardo Gonçalves Serra, 2018. "Construction of Biodigesters to Optimize the Production of Biogas from Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Food Waste and Sewage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-10, April.
    14. Alberto Benato & Chiara D’Alpaos & Alarico Macor, 2022. "Possible Ways of Extending the Biogas Plants Lifespan after the Feed-In Tariff Expiration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-23, October.
    15. Rotunno, Paolo & Lanzini, Andrea & Leone, Pierluigi, 2017. "Energy and economic analysis of a water scrubbing based biogas upgrading process for biomethane injection into the gas grid or use as transportation fuel," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(PB), pages 417-432.
    16. Ekaterina S. Titova, 2019. "Biofuel Application as a Factor of Sustainable Development Ensuring: The Case of Russia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-30, October.
    17. Clauser, Nicolás M. & Felissia, Fernando E. & Area, María C. & Vallejos, María E., 2021. "A framework for the design and analysis of integrated multi-product biorefineries from agricultural and forestry wastes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    18. Edyta Słupek & Patrycja Makoś, 2020. "Absorptive Desulfurization of Model Biogas Stream Using Choline Chloride-Based Deep Eutectic Solvents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, February.
    19. Budzianowski, Wojciech M., 2016. "A review of potential innovations for production, conditioning and utilization of biogas with multiple-criteria assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1148-1171.
    20. Han, Siyu & Meng, Yuan & Aihemaiti, Aikelaimu & Gao, Yuchen & Ju, Tongyao & Xiang, Honglin & Jiang, Jianguo, 2022. "Biogas upgrading with various single and blended amines solutions: Capacities and kinetics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:198:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220304758. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.