IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v191y2020ics0360544219322297.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of quantitative SHE index for waste to energy technology selection

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmad, Syaza I.
  • Ho, Wai Shin
  • Hassim, Mimi H.
  • Elagroudy, Sherien
  • Abdul Kohar, Rabiatul Adawiyyah
  • Bong, Cassendra Phun Chien
  • Hashim, Haslenda
  • Rashid, Roslina

Abstract

Municipal solid waste (MSW) conversion to energy through waste-to-energy technologies (WtE) is promising in offering sustainable and environmentally friendly answers to MSW disposal problems. This paper proposes a quantitative safety, health and environmental (SHE) index for WtE selection. This technique compares WtE technologies according to SHE hazards posed by the chemicals produced. Scores representing the level of hazards expected is assigned to SHE parameters through the implementation of the logistic function. These scores are then added to produce a single score representing the technologies called the Safety, Health and Environmental Total Score (SHETS). Technologies with a lower score are more preferable than a higher score. This technique was applied to a case study of landfill gas recovery system, incineration, gasification, and anaerobic digestion. Incineration is evaluated as the least preferred technology with SHETS value of 54.74 mainly due to the existence of sulfur dioxide which has high atmospheric toxicity and acidification potential while gasification is the most preferred waste-to-energy technology with SHETS value of 50.82. The developed index provides insight on SHE hazards of the chemicals produced allowing the adoption of preventive measures for the development of WtE technology that is efficient in energy production, safer, healthier and environmentally friendlier.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmad, Syaza I. & Ho, Wai Shin & Hassim, Mimi H. & Elagroudy, Sherien & Abdul Kohar, Rabiatul Adawiyyah & Bong, Cassendra Phun Chien & Hashim, Haslenda & Rashid, Roslina, 2020. "Development of quantitative SHE index for waste to energy technology selection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:191:y:2020:i:c:s0360544219322297
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116534
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544219322297
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116534?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Milutinović, Biljana & Stefanović, Gordana & Đekić, Petar S. & Mijailović, Ivan & Tomić, Mladen, 2017. "Environmental assessment of waste management scenarios with energy recovery using life cycle assessment and multi-criteria analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 917-926.
    2. Kalyani, Khanjan Ajaybhai & Pandey, Krishan K., 2014. "Waste to energy status in India: A short review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 113-120.
    3. Fazeli, Alireza & Bakhtvar, Farzaneh & Jahanshaloo, Leila & Che Sidik, Nor Azwadi & Bayat, Ali Esfandyari, 2016. "Malaysia׳s stand on municipal solid waste conversion to energy: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1007-1016.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dan Cudjoe, 2023. "Energy-economics and environmental prospects of integrated waste-to-energy projects in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(11), pages 12597-12628, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Esfilar, Reza & Bagheri, Mehdi & Golestani, Behrooz, 2021. "Technoeconomic feasibility review of hybrid waste to energy system in the campus: A case study for the University of Victoria," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    2. Sohoo, Ihsanullah & Ritzkowski, Marco & Heerenklage, Jörn & Kuchta, Kerstin, 2021. "Biochemical methane potential assessment of municipal solid waste generated in Asian cities: A case study of Karachi, Pakistan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    3. Arbulú, Italo & Lozano, Javier & Rey-Maquieira, Javier, 2017. "The challenges of tourism to waste-to-energy public-private partnerships," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 916-921.
    4. Ogunjuyigbe, A.S.O. & Ayodele, T.R. & Alao, M.A., 2017. "Electricity generation from municipal solid waste in some selected cities of Nigeria: An assessment of feasibility, potential and technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 149-162.
    5. Oscar Claveria & Enric Monte & Salvador Torra, 2018. "“Tracking economic growth by evolving expectations via genetic programming: A two-step approach”," AQR Working Papers 201801, University of Barcelona, Regional Quantitative Analysis Group, revised Jan 2018.
    6. Santiago Alzate-Arias & Álvaro Jaramillo-Duque & Fernando Villada & Bonie Restrepo-Cuestas, 2018. "Assessment of Government Incentives for Energy from Waste in Colombia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Silva, Leo Jaymee de Vilas Boas da & Santos, Ivan Felipe Silva dos & Mensah, Johnson Herlich Roslee & Gonçalves, Andriani Tavares Tenório & Barros, Regina Mambeli, 2020. "Incineration of municipal solid waste in Brazil: An analysis of the economically viable energy potential," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 1386-1394.
    8. Sandylove Afrane & Jeffrey Dankwa Ampah & Ephraim Bonah Agyekum & Prince Oppong Amoh & Abdulfatah Abdu Yusuf & Islam Md Rizwanul Fattah & Ebenezer Agbozo & Elmazeg Elgamli & Mokhtar Shouran & Guozhu M, 2022. "Integrated AHP-TOPSIS under a Fuzzy Environment for the Selection of Waste-To-Energy Technologies in Ghana: A Performance Analysis and Socio-Enviro-Economic Feasibility Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-31, July.
    9. Brigagão, George Victor & de Medeiros, José Luiz & Araújo, Ofélia de Queiroz F. & Mikulčić, Hrvoje & Duić, Neven, 2021. "A zero-emission sustainable landfill-gas-to-wire oxyfuel process: Bioenergy with carbon capture and sequestration," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    10. Malinauskaite, J. & Jouhara, H. & Czajczyńska, D. & Stanchev, P. & Katsou, E. & Rostkowski, P. & Thorne, R.J. & Colón, J. & Ponsá, S. & Al-Mansour, F. & Anguilano, L. & Krzyżyńska, R. & López, I.C. & , 2017. "Municipal solid waste management and waste-to-energy in the context of a circular economy and energy recycling in Europe," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 2013-2044.
    11. Sun, Yu & Chen, Lizhen & Sun, Huaping & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad, 2020. "Low-carbon financial risk factor correlation in the belt and road PPP project," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    12. Jeslin Drusila Nesamalar, J. & Venkatesh, P. & Charles Raja, S., 2017. "The drive of renewable energy in Tamilnadu: Status, barriers and future prospect," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 115-124.
    13. Christos Vlachokostas, 2020. "Closing the Loop Between Energy Production and Waste Management: A Conceptual Approach Towards Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-15, July.
    14. Prajapati, Kishan Kumar & Yadav, Monika & Singh, Rao Martand & Parikh, Priti & Pareek, Nidhi & Vivekanand, Vivekanand, 2021. "An overview of municipal solid waste management in Jaipur city, India - Current status, challenges and recommendations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    15. Lu, Jintao & Rong, Dan & Lev, Benjamin & Liang, Mengshang & Zhang, Chong & Gao, Yangyang, 2023. "Constraints affecting the promotion of waste incineration power generation project in China: A perspective of improved technology acceptance model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PB).
    16. Nandy, Biplob & Sharma, Gaurav & Garg, Saryu & Kumari, Shweta & George, Tess & Sunanda, Yengkhom & Sinha, Bärbel, 2015. "Recovery of consumer waste in India – A mass flow analysis for paper, plastic and glass and the contribution of households and the informal sector," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 167-181.
    17. Agaton, Casper Boongaling & Guno, Charmaine Samala & Villanueva, Resy Ordona & Villanueva, Riza Ordona, 2020. "Economic analysis of waste-to-energy investment in the Philippines: A real options approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    18. Norfadhilah Hamzah & Koji Tokimatsu & Kunio Yoshikawa, 2019. "Solid Fuel from Oil Palm Biomass Residues and Municipal Solid Waste by Hydrothermal Treatment for Electrical Power Generation in Malaysia: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, February.
    19. Torkayesh, Ali Ebadi & Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Rostom, Madona & Malmir, Behnam & Yazdani, Morteza & Suh, Sangwon & Heidrich, Oliver, 2022. "Integrating life cycle assessment and multi criteria decision making for sustainable waste management: Key issues and recommendations for future studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    20. Badgett, Alex & Milbrandt, Anelia, 2020. "A summary of standards and practices for wet waste streams used in waste-to-energy technologies in the United States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:191:y:2020:i:c:s0360544219322297. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.