IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v181y2019icp548-560.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feasibility of Using sCO2 Turbines to Balance Load in Power Grids with a High Deployment of Solar Generation

Author

Listed:
  • Bennett, Jeffrey A.
  • Fuhrman, Jay
  • Brown, Tyler
  • Andrews, Nathan
  • Fittro, Roger
  • Clarens, Andres F.

Abstract

Solar photovoltaic power generation capacity is growing rapidly, increasing the need for dynamic load balancing when solar production dips. This balancing might be delivered using energy storage and/or advanced power generation cycles, that are compact, dynamic, and highly efficient, such as supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO2) cycles. Here, the load balancing capability of a sCO2 combined cycle plant was compared to open cycle and steam combined cycle gas turbines. A characteristic-based transient model was developed to evaluate the impact of machinery ramp rates, minimum part loads, and cycle efficiencies. High resolution demand and solar irradiance data from the University of Virginia campus, before and after installation of a major solar project, was used to represent low and high levels of solar deployment in the grid. The results suggest that under high deployment of solar power, sCO2 cycles and steam combined cycle systems with ramp rates greater than 5.75%/minute can balance load and provide comparable levelized costs of electricity ($0.057/kWh). Solar curtailment was driven by the minimum part load capabilities. A sCO2 cycle with a minimum part load of 30% was predicted to have a curtailment of 15% in the high solar scenario without a battery, and 4% with a 30 MWh battery.

Suggested Citation

  • Bennett, Jeffrey A. & Fuhrman, Jay & Brown, Tyler & Andrews, Nathan & Fittro, Roger & Clarens, Andres F., 2019. "Feasibility of Using sCO2 Turbines to Balance Load in Power Grids with a High Deployment of Solar Generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 548-560.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:181:y:2019:i:c:p:548-560
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544219310254
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.143?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huber, Matthias & Dimkova, Desislava & Hamacher, Thomas, 2014. "Integration of wind and solar power in Europe: Assessment of flexibility requirements," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 236-246.
    2. Ueckerdt, Falko & Brecha, Robert & Luderer, Gunnar, 2015. "Analyzing major challenges of wind and solar variability in power systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1-10.
    3. Zahedi, A., 2011. "Maximizing solar PV energy penetration using energy storage technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 866-870, January.
    4. Crespi, Francesco & Gavagnin, Giacomo & Sánchez, David & Martínez, Gonzalo S., 2017. "Supercritical carbon dioxide cycles for power generation: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 152-183.
    5. Kasaei, Mohammad Javad & Gandomkar, Majid & Nikoukar, Javad, 2017. "Optimal management of renewable energy sources by virtual power plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PB), pages 1180-1188.
    6. Nosratabadi, Seyyed Mostafa & Hooshmand, Rahmat-Allah & Gholipour, Eskandar, 2017. "A comprehensive review on microgrid and virtual power plant concepts employed for distributed energy resources scheduling in power systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 341-363.
    7. Das, Barun K. & Al-Abdeli, Yasir M. & Kothapalli, Ganesh, 2017. "Optimisation of stand-alone hybrid energy systems supplemented by combustion-based prime movers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 18-33.
    8. Walnum, Harald Taxt & Nekså, Petter & Nord, Lars O. & Andresen, Trond, 2013. "Modelling and simulation of CO2 (carbon dioxide) bottoming cycles for offshore oil and gas installations at design and off-design conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 513-520.
    9. Kalantar, M. & Mousavi G., S.M., 2010. "Dynamic behavior of a stand-alone hybrid power generation system of wind turbine, microturbine, solar array and battery storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(10), pages 3051-3064, October.
    10. Luo, Xing & Wang, Jihong & Dooner, Mark & Clarke, Jonathan, 2015. "Overview of current development in electrical energy storage technologies and the application potential in power system operation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 511-536.
    11. Dufo-López, Rodolfo & Bernal-Agustín, José L. & Yusta-Loyo, José M. & Domínguez-Navarro, José A. & Ramírez-Rosado, Ignacio J. & Lujano, Juan & Aso, Ismael, 2011. "Multi-objective optimization minimizing cost and life cycle emissions of stand-alone PV–wind–diesel systems with batteries storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 4033-4041.
    12. de Groot, Mats & Crijns-Graus, Wina & Harmsen, Robert, 2017. "The effects of variable renewable electricity on energy efficiency and full load hours of fossil-fired power plants in the European Union," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 575-589.
    13. Denholm, Paul & Hand, Maureen, 2011. "Grid flexibility and storage required to achieve very high penetration of variable renewable electricity," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 1817-1830, March.
    14. Bajpai, Prabodh & Dash, Vaishalee, 2012. "Hybrid renewable energy systems for power generation in stand-alone applications: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 2926-2939.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yang, Jingze & Chi, Hetian & Cheng, Mohan & Dong, Mingqi & Li, Siwu & Yao, Hong, 2023. "Performance analysis of hydrogen supply using curtailed power from a solar-wind-storage power system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1005-1019.
    2. Kunniyoor, Vijayaraj & Singh, Punit & Nadella, Karthik, 2020. "Value of closed-cycle gas turbines with design assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    3. Yang, Jiaqi & Ma, Yuan & Wang, Wujun, 2023. "An analytical method for quickly evaluating the performances of refractory alloys in sCO2 Brayton cycle applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    4. Li, Qingshan & Wang, Chenfang & Wang, Chunmei & Zhou, Taotao & Zhang, Xianwen & Zhang, Yangjun & Zhuge, Weilin & Sun, Li, 2023. "Comparison of organic coolants for boiling cooling of proton exchange membrane fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    5. Bennett, Jeffrey A. & Fitts, Jeffrey P. & Clarens, Andres F., 2022. "Compressed air energy storage capacity of offshore saline aquifers using isothermal cycling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    6. Bennett, Jeffrey A. & Simpson, Juliet G. & Qin, Chao & Fittro, Roger & Koenig, Gary M. & Clarens, Andres F. & Loth, Eric, 2021. "Techno-economic analysis of offshore isothermal compressed air energy storage in saline aquifers co-located with wind power," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrychowicz, Mateusz & Olek, Blazej & Przybylski, Jakub, 2017. "Review of the methods for evaluation of renewable energy sources penetration and ramping used in the Scenario Outlook and Adequacy Forecast 2015. Case study for Poland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 703-714.
    2. Mararakanye, Ndamulelo & Bekker, Bernard, 2019. "Renewable energy integration impacts within the context of generator type, penetration level and grid characteristics," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 441-451.
    3. Cruz, Marco R.M. & Fitiwi, Desta Z. & Santos, Sérgio F. & Catalão, João P.S., 2018. "A comprehensive survey of flexibility options for supporting the low-carbon energy future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 338-353.
    4. Das, Barun K. & Al-Abdeli, Yasir M. & Kothapalli, Ganesh, 2017. "Optimisation of stand-alone hybrid energy systems supplemented by combustion-based prime movers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 18-33.
    5. Brunner, Christoph & Deac, Gerda & Braun, Sebastian & Zöphel, Christoph, 2020. "The future need for flexibility and the impact of fluctuating renewable power generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 1314-1324.
    6. Min, C.G. & Park, J.K. & Hur, D. & Kim, M.K., 2016. "A risk evaluation method for ramping capability shortage in power systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1316-1324.
    7. Sinn, Hans-Werner, 2017. "Buffering volatility: A study on the limits of Germany's energy revolution," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 130-150.
    8. Chang-Gi Min & Mun-Kyeom Kim, 2017. "Flexibility-Based Evaluation of Variable Generation Acceptability in Korean Power System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-12, June.
    9. Martin, Nigel & Rice, John, 2021. "Power outages, climate events and renewable energy: Reviewing energy storage policy and regulatory options for Australia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    10. Cheng, Yu-Shan & Chuang, Man-Tsai & Liu, Yi-Hua & Wang, Shun-Chung & Yang, Zong-Zhen, 2016. "A particle swarm optimization based power dispatch algorithm with roulette wheel re-distribution mechanism for equality constraint," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 58-72.
    11. Batas Bjelić, Ilija & Rajaković, Nikola & Krajačić, Goran & Duić, Neven, 2016. "Two methods for decreasing the flexibility gap in national energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P3), pages 1701-1709.
    12. Cárdenas, Bruno & Ibanez, Roderaid & Rouse, James & Swinfen-Styles, Lawrie & Garvey, Seamus, 2023. "The effect of a nuclear baseload in a zero-carbon electricity system: An analysis for the UK," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 256-272.
    13. Kopiske, Jakob & Spieker, Sebastian & Tsatsaronis, George, 2017. "Value of power plant flexibility in power systems with high shares of variable renewables: A scenario outlook for Germany 2035," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 823-833.
    14. Teirilä, Juha, 2020. "The value of the nuclear power plant fleet in the German power market under the expansion of fluctuating renewables," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    15. Hua Zhou & Huahua Wu & Chengjin Ye & Shijie Xiao & Jun Zhang & Xu He & Bo Wang, 2019. "Integration Capability Evaluation of Wind and Photovoltaic Generation in Power Systems Based on Temporal and Spatial Correlations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, January.
    16. Aliaga, D.M. & Romero, C.P. & Feick, R. & Brooks, W.K. & Campbell, A.N., 2024. "Modelling and simulation of a novel liquid air energy storage system with a liquid piston, NH3 and CO2 cycles for enhanced heat and cold utilisation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 362(C).
    17. Luo, Zhe & Hong, SeungHo & Ding, YueMin, 2019. "A data mining-driven incentive-based demand response scheme for a virtual power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 549-559.
    18. Efstathios E. Michaelides, 2021. "Thermodynamics, Energy Dissipation, and Figures of Merit of Energy Storage Systems—A Critical Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-41, September.
    19. Khalid, Muhammad & Ahmadi, Abdollah & Savkin, Andrey V. & Agelidis, Vassilios G., 2016. "Minimizing the energy cost for microgrids integrated with renewable energy resources and conventional generation using controlled battery energy storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 646-655.
    20. Li, Zhaozhi & Shao, Yingjuan & Zhong, Wenqi & Liu, Hao, 2023. "Optimal design and thermodynamic evaluation of supercritical CO2 oxy-coal circulating fluidized bed power generation systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:181:y:2019:i:c:p:548-560. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.