IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v169y2019icp542-557.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Heat transfer investigation of supercritical R134a for trans-critical organic Rankine cycle system

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Dabiao
  • Tian, Ran
  • Zhang, Yue
  • Li, LanLan
  • Ma, Yuezheng
  • Shi, Lin
  • Li, Hui

Abstract

In order to restrict the adverse effects caused by the heat transfer deterioration of the supercritical fluid and to build a cost-effective Trans-critical Organic Ranke Cycle (TORC) system, the heat transfer of supercritical R134a was experimentally investigated in a horizontal ribbed tube for the first time. Knowledge that are important for the design of the supercritical heater and TORC system were explored in detail, including the general features of the heat transfer and effects of heat fluxes, pressures, and mass fluxes. It was found that large heat flux will decrease Nu in most cases, and the effects of pressure differed largely in different working conditions. The working conditions with low heat flux, large mass flue and pressure close to the critical pressure were recommended for the design of the supercritical heater and TORC system. Compared with vertical smooth tubes, the threshold for heat transfer deterioration criterion, Bo, was enlarged at least 7.5 times and the heat transfer was improved around 1.6 times among all the experimental data. Then, different types of previous correlations were evaluated and none of them showed a satisfactory accuracy. Finally, new correlations with better prediction accuracy were built to provide references for the TORC system design.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Dabiao & Tian, Ran & Zhang, Yue & Li, LanLan & Ma, Yuezheng & Shi, Lin & Li, Hui, 2019. "Heat transfer investigation of supercritical R134a for trans-critical organic Rankine cycle system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 542-557.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:169:y:2019:i:c:p:542-557
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544218324009
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.034?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Dabiao & Ma, Yuezheng & Tian, Ran & Duan, Jie & Hu, Busong & Shi, Lin, 2018. "Thermodynamic evaluation of an ORC system with a Low Pressure Saturated Steam heat source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 375-385.
    2. Huang, Dan & Wu, Zan & Sunden, Bengt & Li, Wei, 2016. "A brief review on convection heat transfer of fluids at supercritical pressures in tubes and the recent progress," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 494-505.
    3. Feng, Yongqiang & Zhang, Yaning & Li, Bingxi & Yang, Jinfu & Shi, Yang, 2015. "Sensitivity analysis and thermoeconomic comparison of ORCs (organic Rankine cycles) for low temperature waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 664-677.
    4. Baik, Young-Jin & Kim, Minsung & Chang, Ki Chang & Kim, Sung Jin, 2011. "Power-based performance comparison between carbon dioxide and R125 transcritical cycles for a low-grade heat source," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(3), pages 892-898, March.
    5. Maraver, Daniel & Royo, Javier & Lemort, Vincent & Quoilin, Sylvain, 2014. "Systematic optimization of subcritical and transcritical organic Rankine cycles (ORCs) constrained by technical parameters in multiple applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 11-29.
    6. Chen, Huijuan & Yogi Goswami, D. & Rahman, Muhammad M. & Stefanakos, Elias K., 2011. "Energetic and exergetic analysis of CO2- and R32-based transcritical Rankine cycles for low-grade heat conversion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(8), pages 2802-2808, August.
    7. Li, Zhouhang & Tang, Guoli & Wu, Yuxin & Zhai, Yuling & Xu, Jianxin & Wang, Hua & Lu, Junfu, 2016. "Improved gas heaters for supercritical CO2 Rankine cycles: Considerations on forced and mixed convection heat transfer enhancement," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 126-141.
    8. Quoilin, Sylvain & Broek, Martijn Van Den & Declaye, Sébastien & Dewallef, Pierre & Lemort, Vincent, 2013. "Techno-economic survey of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 168-186.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Theologou, Konstantinos & Mertz, Rainer & Laurien, Eckart & Starflinger, Jörg, 2022. "Experimental investigations on heat transfer of CO2 under supercritical pressure in heated horizontal pipes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    2. Tian, Ran & Xu, Yunting & Shi, Lin & Song, Panpan & Wei, Mingshan, 2020. "Mixed convection heat transfer of supercritical pressure R1234yf in horizontal flow: Comparison study as alternative to R134a in organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    3. Zhang, Shijie & Xu, Xiaoxiao & Liu, Chao & Dang, Chaobin, 2020. "A review on application and heat transfer enhancement of supercritical CO2 in low-grade heat conversion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2017. "Integrated thermoeconomic optimization of standard and regenerative ORC for different heat source types and capacities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 570-598.
    2. Lecompte, S. & Huisseune, H. & van den Broek, M. & De Paepe, M., 2015. "Methodical thermodynamic analysis and regression models of organic Rankine cycle architectures for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 60-76.
    3. Guo, Yumin & Guo, Xinru & Wang, Jiangfeng & Li, Zhanying & Cheng, Shangfang & Wang, Shunsen, 2024. "Comprehensive analysis and optimization for a novel combined heating and power system based on self-condensing transcritical CO2 Rankine cycle driven by geothermal energy from thermodynamic, exergoeco," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    4. Liu, Qiang & Shen, Aijing & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2015. "Parametric optimization and performance analyses of geothermal organic Rankine cycles using R600a/R601a mixtures as working fluids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 410-420.
    5. Löffler, Michael, 2017. "Batch Processes in Heat Engines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 788-794.
    6. Wang, Jiangtao & Zhai, Yuling & Wang, Hua & Li, Zhouhang, 2023. "Heat transfer performance of supercritical R134a in a U-bend vapor generator for transcritical ORC system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    7. Sarkar, Jahar, 2015. "Review and future trends of supercritical CO2 Rankine cycle for low-grade heat conversion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 434-451.
    8. Pezzuolo, Alex & Benato, Alberto & Stoppato, Anna & Mirandola, Alberto, 2016. "The ORC-PD: A versatile tool for fluid selection and Organic Rankine Cycle unit design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 605-620.
    9. Steven Lecompte & Sanne Lemmens & Henk Huisseune & Martijn Van den Broek & Michel De Paepe, 2015. "Multi-Objective Thermo-Economic Optimization Strategy for ORCs Applied to Subcritical and Transcritical Cycles for Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-28, April.
    10. Zeb, K. & Ali, S.M. & Khan, B. & Mehmood, C.A. & Tareen, N. & Din, W. & Farid, U. & Haider, A., 2017. "A survey on waste heat recovery: Electric power generation and potential prospects within Pakistan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1142-1155.
    11. Lecompte, Steven & Huisseune, Henk & van den Broek, Martijn & Vanslambrouck, Bruno & De Paepe, Michel, 2015. "Review of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 448-461.
    12. Shu, Gequn & Shi, Lingfeng & Tian, Hua & Li, Xiaoya & Huang, Guangdai & Chang, Liwen, 2016. "An improved CO2-based transcritical Rankine cycle (CTRC) used for engine waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 171-182.
    13. Le, Van Long & Feidt, Michel & Kheiri, Abdelhamid & Pelloux-Prayer, Sandrine, 2014. "Performance optimization of low-temperature power generation by supercritical ORCs (organic Rankine cycles) using low GWP (global warming potential) working fluids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 513-526.
    14. Kermani, Maziar & Wallerand, Anna S. & Kantor, Ivan D. & Maréchal, François, 2018. "Generic superstructure synthesis of organic Rankine cycles for waste heat recovery in industrial processes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1203-1225.
    15. Bamorovat Abadi, Gholamreza & Kim, Kyung Chun, 2017. "Investigation of organic Rankine cycles with zeotropic mixtures as a working fluid: Advantages and issues," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1000-1013.
    16. Woodland, Brandon J. & Ziviani, Davide & Braun, James E. & Groll, Eckhard A., 2020. "Considerations on alternative organic Rankine Cycle congurations for low-grade waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    17. Sun, Hongchuang & Qin, Jiang & Hung, Tzu-Chen & Lin, Chih-Hung & Lin, Yi-Fan, 2018. "Performance comparison of organic Rankine cycle with expansion from superheated zone or two-phase zone based on temperature utilization rate of heat source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 566-576.
    18. Desideri, Adriano & Gusev, Sergei & van den Broek, Martijn & Lemort, Vincent & Quoilin, Sylvain, 2016. "Experimental comparison of organic fluids for low temperature ORC (organic Rankine cycle) systems for waste heat recovery applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 460-469.
    19. Francesco Calise & Davide Capuano & Laura Vanoli, 2015. "Dynamic Simulation and Exergo-Economic Optimization of a Hybrid Solar–Geothermal Cogeneration Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-41, April.
    20. Andres Hernandez & Adriano Desideri & Clara Ionescu & Robin De Keyser & Vincent Lemort & Sylvain Quoilin, 2016. "Real-Time Optimization of Organic Rankine Cycle Systems by Extremum-Seeking Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-18, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:169:y:2019:i:c:p:542-557. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.