IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v157y2018icp1015-1024.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental burden mitigation potential of oil field gas-assisted coal-to-olefin production

Author

Listed:
  • Ye, Liping
  • Xie, Fei
  • Hong, Jinglan
  • Yang, Donglu
  • Ma, Xiaotian
  • Li, Xiangzhi

Abstract

Coal-to-olefin (CTO) projects, an energy strategy, are increasing in number in China but suffer from high consumption and pollution. In this study, a life cycle assessment is studied to determine whether oil field gas-assisted CTO systems have the potential to solve these problems. Oil-to-olefin is presented for comparison. Results showed that the current CTO scenario generally exerts a higher environmental impact than oil-to-olefin. The effects on carcinogens, climate change, and fossil depletion, which were provided mainly by chromium to water, carbon dioxide to air, and hard coal consumption, respectively, are the main contributors to the environmental burden. Oil field gas-assisted coal-to-methanol production decreases the potential impact on climate change, carcinogens, and fossil depletion by 40%, 9%, and 50%, respectively, because it consumes less coal (>73%) than conventional coal-to-methanol production. Oil field gas-assisted CTO is an attainable and effective means of carbon reduction in the CTO industry in China. It is highly recommended for further improving the environmental performance of the CTO industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Ye, Liping & Xie, Fei & Hong, Jinglan & Yang, Donglu & Ma, Xiaotian & Li, Xiangzhi, 2018. "Environmental burden mitigation potential of oil field gas-assisted coal-to-olefin production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 1015-1024.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:157:y:2018:i:c:p:1015-1024
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.167
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544218310119
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.167?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Say, Nuriye Peker & Yucel, Muzaffer, 2006. "Energy consumption and CO2 emissions in Turkey: Empirical analysis and future projection based on an economic growth," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(18), pages 3870-3876, December.
    2. Viebahn, Peter & Vallentin, Daniel & Höller, Samuel, 2015. "Prospects of carbon capture and storage (CCS) in China’s power sector – An integrated assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 229-244.
    3. Zhou, Huairong & Qian, Yu & Yang, Siyu, 2015. "Energetic/economic penalty of CO2 emissions and application to coal-to-olefins projects in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 344-353.
    4. Gao, Lin & Li, Hongqiang & Chen, Bin & Jin, Hongguang & Lin, Rumou & Hong, Hui, 2008. "Proposal of a natural gas-based polygeneration system for power and methanol production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 206-212.
    5. Köne, Aylin Çigdem & Büke, Tayfun, 2010. "Forecasting of CO2 emissions from fuel combustion using trend analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 2906-2915, December.
    6. Xiang, Dong & Qian, Yu & Man, Yi & Yang, Siyu, 2014. "Techno-economic analysis of the coal-to-olefins process in comparison with the oil-to-olefins process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 639-647.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Junjie, 2024. "Spatialized carbon-energy-water footprint of emerging coal chemical industry in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    2. Haider Mahmood & Maham Furqan, 2021. "Oil rents and greenhouse gas emissions: spatial analysis of Gulf Cooperation Council countries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 6215-6233, April.
    3. Yan Li & Guoshun Wang & Zhaohao Li & Jiahai Yuan & Dan Gao & Heng Zhang, 2020. "A Life Cycle Analysis of Deploying Coking Technology to Utilize Low-Rank Coal in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-17, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Song, Rui & Feng, Xiaoyu & Wang, Yao & Sun, Shuyu & Liu, Jianjun, 2021. "Dissociation and transport modeling of methane hydrate in core-scale sandy sediments: A comparative study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    2. Aydin, Gokhan, 2014. "Modeling of energy consumption based on economic and demographic factors: The case of Turkey with projections," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 382-389.
    3. Kapsalyamova, Zhanna & Paltsev, Sergey, 2020. "Use of natural gas and oil as a source of feedstocks," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    4. Xu, Mengmeng & Lin, Boqiang & Wang, Siquan, 2021. "Towards energy conservation by improving energy efficiency? Evidence from China’s metallurgical industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    5. Zhou, Yinbo & Li, Hansheng & Huang, Jilei & Zhang, Ruilin & Wang, Shijie & Hong, Yidu & Yang, Yongliang, 2021. "Influence of coal deformation on the Knudsen number of gas flow in coal seams," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    6. Azimi, Seyyed Shahabeddin & Namazi, Mohammad Hosain, 2015. "Modeling of combustion of gas oil and natural gas in a furnace: Comparison of combustion characteristics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 458-465.
    7. Atherton, John & Xie, Wanni & Aditya, Leonardus Kevin & Zhou, Xiaochi & Karmakar, Gourab & Akroyd, Jethro & Mosbach, Sebastian & Lim, Mei Qi & Kraft, Markus, 2021. "How does a carbon tax affect Britain’s power generation composition?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    8. Dongliang, Wang & Wenliang, Meng & Huairong, Zhou & Guixian, Li & Yong, Yang & Hongwei, Li, 2021. "Green hydrogen coupling with CO2 utilization of coal-to-methanol for high methanol productivity and low CO2 emission," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    9. Ying, Zhou & Xin-gang, Zhao, 2021. "The impact of Renewable Portfolio Standards on carbon emission trading under the background of China’s electricity marketization reform," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    10. Ali, E.S. & Abd Elazim, S.M. & Abdelaziz, A.Y., 2016. "Ant Lion Optimization Algorithm for Renewable Distributed Generations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P1), pages 445-458.
    11. Hakan Cetintas & I. Murat Bicil & Kumru Turkoz, 2017. "Turkiye'de Enerji Uretiminde Fosil Yakit Kullanimi ve CO2 Emisyonu Iliskisi: Bir Senaryo Analizi," EconWorld Working Papers 17002, WERI-World Economic Research Institute, revised Mar 2017.
    12. Huang, Yi & Yi, Qun & Kang, Jing-Xian & Zhang, Ya-Gang & Li, Wen-Ying & Feng, Jie & Xie, Ke-Chang, 2019. "Investigation and optimization analysis on deployment of China coal chemical industry under carbon emission constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    13. Jiang, Peng & Parvez, Ashak Mahmud & Meng, Yang & Xu, Meng-xia & Shui, Tian-chi & Sun, Cheng-gong & Wu, Tao, 2019. "Exergetic, economic and carbon emission studies of bio-olefin production via indirect steam gasification process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    14. Kim, Hyung Woo & Seo, Su Been & Kang, Seo Yeong & Go, Eun Sol & Oh, Seung Seok & Lee, YongWoon & Yang, Won & Lee, See Hoon, 2021. "Effect of flue gas recirculation on efficiency of an indirect supercritical CO2 oxy-fuel circulating fluidized bed power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    15. Li, Junjie, 2024. "Spatialized carbon-energy-water footprint of emerging coal chemical industry in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    16. Bilgili, Faik & Koçak, Emrah & Bulut, Ümit & Sualp, M. Nedim, 2016. "How did the US economy react to shale gas production revolution? An advanced time series approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P1), pages 963-977.
    17. You, Junyu & Ampomah, William & Sun, Qian, 2020. "Co-optimizing water-alternating-carbon dioxide injection projects using a machine learning assisted computational framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    18. Xiang, Dong & Xiang, Junjie & Sun, Zhe & Cao, Yan, 2017. "The integrated coke-oven gas and pulverized coke gasification for methanol production with highly efficient hydrogen utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 78-91.
    19. Qin, Chao & Jiang, Yongdong & Zuo, Shuangying & Chen, Shiwan & Xiao, Siyou & Liu, Zhengjie, 2021. "Investigation of adsorption kinetics of CH4 and CO2 on shale exposure to supercritical CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    20. Ozturk, Ilhan & Acaravci, Ali, 2010. "CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 3220-3225, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:157:y:2018:i:c:p:1015-1024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.