IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v147y2018icp490-503.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-objective optimization of hybrid CSP+PV system using genetic algorithm

Author

Listed:
  • Starke, Allan R.
  • Cardemil, José M.
  • Escobar, Rodrigo
  • Colle, Sergio

Abstract

Renewable energy has experienced a significant growth on its rate of deployment as a clean and competitive alternative for conventional power sources. The reduction on the installation costs for PV systems has converted this technology into a relevant player regarding the electricity matrix. However, a larger penetration of PV systems is restricted to the availability of affordable technological options for storage. The integration of thermal energy storage to CSP systems is, on the other hand, straightforward through technologies already available in the market. Hence, the hybridization of CSP and PV systems has the potential for reducing operational and installation costs, as well as increasing significantly the capacity factor of solar power plants. The present study describes a methodology for design and sizing such hybrid plants, by implementing a transient simulation model, coupled to an evolutionary optimization algorithm, allowing to address the trade off between costs and capacity factor. The simulation model is applied to a case study considering the characteristics of a location in northern Chile. The results are presented in terms of the Pareto Frontiers that summarizes the compromise between the economic performance and the capacity factor of the plant. It is observed that the capacity factor achieves values higher that 85%, and the LCOE is lower than those observed for stand alone CSP plants. The methodology developed constitutes a useful tool for decision makers, who can assess the performance of the hybrid plant based in a detailed transient simulation and selecting the best configuration according to market constraints or its willingness for achieving certain level of capacity factor.

Suggested Citation

  • Starke, Allan R. & Cardemil, José M. & Escobar, Rodrigo & Colle, Sergio, 2018. "Multi-objective optimization of hybrid CSP+PV system using genetic algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 490-503.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:147:y:2018:i:c:p:490-503
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.12.116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054421732159X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2017.12.116?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Denholm, Paul & Margolis, Robert M., 2007. "Evaluating the limits of solar photovoltaics (PV) in electric power systems utilizing energy storage and other enabling technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 4424-4433, September.
    2. Li, Yuqiang & Liu, Gang & Liu, Xianping & Liao, Shengming, 2016. "Thermodynamic multi-objective optimization of a solar-dish Brayton system based on maximum power output, thermal efficiency and ecological performance," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 465-473.
    3. Escobar, Rodrigo A. & Cortés, Cristián & Pino, Alan & Pereira, Enio Bueno & Martins, Fernando Ramos & Cardemil, José Miguel, 2014. "Solar energy resource assessment in Chile: Satellite estimation and ground station measurements," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 324-332.
    4. V. Srinivasan & Allan Shocker, 1973. "Linear programming techniques for multidimensional analysis of preferences," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 38(3), pages 337-369, September.
    5. Zhou, Wei & Lou, Chengzhi & Li, Zhongshi & Lu, Lin & Yang, Hongxing, 2010. "Current status of research on optimum sizing of stand-alone hybrid solar-wind power generation systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 380-389, February.
    6. Lazzaretto, A. & Toffolo, A., 2004. "Energy, economy and environment as objectives in multi-criterion optimization of thermal systems design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(8), pages 1139-1157.
    7. Sayyaadi, Hoseyn & Mehrabipour, Reza, 2012. "Efficiency enhancement of a gas turbine cycle using an optimized tubular recuperative heat exchanger," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 362-375.
    8. Denholm, Paul & Margolis, Robert M., 2007. "Evaluating the limits of solar photovoltaics (PV) in traditional electric power systems," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 2852-2861, May.
    9. Ahmadi, Pouria & Dincer, Ibrahim & Rosen, Marc A., 2011. "Exergy, exergoeconomic and environmental analyses and evolutionary algorithm based multi-objective optimization of combined cycle power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 5886-5898.
    10. Avila-Marin, Antonio L. & Fernandez-Reche, Jesus & Tellez, Felix M., 2013. "Evaluation of the potential of central receiver solar power plants: Configuration, optimization and trends," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 274-288.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pietzcker, Robert Carl & Stetter, Daniel & Manger, Susanne & Luderer, Gunnar, 2014. "Using the sun to decarbonize the power sector: The economic potential of photovoltaics and concentrating solar power," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 704-720.
    2. Ahmadi, Mohammad H. & Amin Nabakhteh, Mohammad & Ahmadi, Mohammad-Ali & Pourfayaz, Fathollah & Bidi, Mokhtar, 2017. "Investigation and optimization of performance of nano-scale Stirling refrigerator using working fluid as Maxwell–Boltzmann gases," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 483(C), pages 337-350.
    3. Weber, Sylvain & Puddu, Stefano & Pacheco, Diana, 2017. "Move it! How an electric contest motivates households to shift their load profile," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 255-270.
    4. Solomon, A.A. & Faiman, D. & Meron, G., 2012. "Appropriate storage for high-penetration grid-connected photovoltaic plants," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 335-344.
    5. Teymouri, Matin & Sadeghi, Shayan & Moghimi, Mahdi & Ghandehariun, Samane, 2021. "3E analysis and optimization of an innovative cogeneration system based on biomass gasification and solar photovoltaic thermal plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    6. Naserabad, S. Nikbakht & Mehrpanahi, A. & Ahmadi, G., 2018. "Multi-objective optimization of HRSG configurations on the steam power plant repowering specifications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 277-293.
    7. Lyons, P.F. & Wade, N.S. & Jiang, T. & Taylor, P.C. & Hashiesh, F. & Michel, M. & Miller, D., 2015. "Design and analysis of electrical energy storage demonstration projects on UK distribution networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 677-691.
    8. Byuk-Keun Jo & Gilsoo Jang, 2019. "An Evaluation of the Effect on the Expansion of Photovoltaic Power Generation According to Renewable Energy Certificates on Energy Storage Systems: A Case Study of the Korean Renewable Energy Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-17, August.
    9. Wooyoung Jeon & Chul-Yong Lee, 2019. "Estimating the Cost of Solar Generation Uncertainty and the Impact of Collocated Energy Storage: The Case of Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, March.
    10. Solomon, A.A. & Faiman, D. & Meron, G., 2012. "The role of conventional power plants in a grid fed mainly by PV and storage, and the largest shadow capacity requirement," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 479-486.
    11. Zack Norwood & Joel Goop & Mikael Odenberger, 2017. "The Future of the European Electricity Grid Is Bright: Cost Minimizing Optimization Shows Solar with Storage as Dominant Technologies to Meet European Emissions Targets to 2050," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-31, December.
    12. Solomon, A.A. & Kammen, Daniel M. & Callaway, D., 2016. "Investigating the impact of wind–solar complementarities on energy storage requirement and the corresponding supply reliability criteria," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 130-145.
    13. Kendel, Adnane & Lazaric, Nathalie & Maréchal, Kevin, 2017. "What do people ‘learn by looking’ at direct feedback on their energy consumption? Results of a field study in Southern France," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 593-605.
    14. Orioli, Aldo & Di Gangi, Alessandra, 2013. "Load mismatch of grid-connected photovoltaic systems: Review of the effects and analysis in an urban context," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 13-28.
    15. Newbery, David, 2018. "Evaluating the case for supporting renewable electricity," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 684-696.
    16. Breyer, Christian & Birkner, Christian & Meiss, Jan & Goldschmidt, Jan Christoph & Riede, Moritz, 2013. "A top-down analysis: Determining photovoltaics R&D investments from patent analysis and R&D headcount," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1570-1580.
    17. Philip Tafarte & Marcus Eichhorn & Daniela Thrän, 2019. "Capacity Expansion Pathways for a Wind and Solar Based Power Supply and the Impact of Advanced Technology—A Case Study for Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-23, January.
    18. Mehrpanahi, A. & Nikbakht Naserabad, S. & Ahmadi, G., 2019. "Multi-objective linear regression based optimization of full repowering a single pressure steam power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1017-1035.
    19. Song, Tangnyu & Huang, Guohe & Zhou, Xiong & Wang, Xiuquan, 2018. "An inexact two-stage fractional energy systems planning model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 275-289.
    20. Nijhuis, M. & Gibescu, M. & Cobben, J.F.G., 2015. "Assessment of the impacts of the renewable energy and ICT driven energy transition on distribution networks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1003-1014.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:147:y:2018:i:c:p:490-503. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.