IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v141y2017icp76-86.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic and environmental analyses of coal and biomass to liquid fuels

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Weiguo
  • Wang, Jingxin
  • Bhattacharyya, Debangsu
  • Jiang, Yuan
  • DeVallance, David

Abstract

We analyzed the economic feasibility and environmental benefits of an alternative technology that converts coal and biomass to liquid fuels (CBTL), using West Virginia as a real case scenario. A mixed integer linear programming model was developed to analyze the economic feasibility. A cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment (LCA) model was also developed to analyze the environmental benefits. Sensitivity analyses on required selling price (RSP) and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of CBTL fuels were conducted according to feedstock availability and price, biomass to coal mix ratio, conversion rate, internal rate of return (IRR), capital cost, operational and maintenance cost. The results showed the price of coal had a more dominant effect on RSP than that of biomass. Different mix ratios and conversion rates led to RSP ranging from $104.3 – $157.9/bbl. LCA results indicated that GHG emissions ranged from 80.62 kg CO2 eq to 101.46 kg CO2 eq/1000 MJ of liquid fuel at various biomass to coal mix ratios and conversion rates if carbon capture and storage (CCS) was applied. Most of the water and fossil energy were consumed in the conversion process. Compared to petroleum-derived-liquid fuels, the reduction in GHG emissions could be between −2.7% and 16.2% with CBTL substitution.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Weiguo & Wang, Jingxin & Bhattacharyya, Debangsu & Jiang, Yuan & DeVallance, David, 2017. "Economic and environmental analyses of coal and biomass to liquid fuels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 76-86.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:141:y:2017:i:c:p:76-86
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.047
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544217315700
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.047?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiang, Yuan & Bhattacharyya, Debangsu, 2017. "Techno-economic analysis of direct coal-biomass to liquids (CBTL) plants with shale gas utilization and CO2 capture and storage (CCS)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 433-448.
    2. Jiang, Yuan & Bhattacharyya, Debangsu, 2016. "Process modeling of direct coal-biomass to liquids (CBTL) plants with shale gas utilization and CO2 capture and storage (CCS)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1616-1632.
    3. Asante, Patrick & Armstrong, Glen W. & Adamowicz, Wiktor L., 2011. "Carbon sequestration and the optimal forest harvest decision: A dynamic programming approach considering biomass and dead organic matter," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 3-17, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Yuxi & Wang, Jingxin & Schuler, Jamie & Hartley, Damon & Volk, Timothy & Eisenbies, Mark, 2020. "Optimization of harvest and logistics for multiple lignocellulosic biomass feedstocks in the northeastern United States," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    2. Yuxi Wang & Jingxin Wang & Xufeng Zhang & Shawn Grushecky, 2020. "Environmental and Economic Assessments and Uncertainties of Multiple Lignocellulosic Biomass Utilization for Bioenergy Products: Case Studies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Santos, Andreia & Carvalho, Ana & Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana Paula & Marques, Alexandra & Amorim, Pedro, 2019. "Assessment and optimization of sustainable forest wood supply chains – A systematic literature review," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 112-135.
    4. Li, Junjie, 2024. "Spatialized carbon-energy-water footprint of emerging coal chemical industry in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    5. Salas, D.A. & Boero, A.J. & Ramirez, A.D., 2024. "Life cycle assessment of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    6. Raghava Rao Kommalapati & Iqbal Hossan & Venkata Sai Vamsi Botlaguduru & Hongbo Du & Ziaul Huque, 2018. "Life Cycle Environmental Impact of Biomass Co-Firing with Coal at a Power Plant in the Greater Houston Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, June.
    7. Cuéllar-Franca, Rosa & García-Gutiérrez, Pelayo & Dimitriou, Ioanna & Elder, Rachael H. & Allen, Ray W.K. & Azapagic, Adisa, 2019. "Utilising carbon dioxide for transport fuels: The economic and environmental sustainability of different Fischer-Tropsch process designs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Ding, Bingqing & Makowski, Marek & Nahorski, Zbigniew & Ren, Hongtao & Ma, Tieju, 2022. "Optimizing the technology pathway of China's liquid fuel production considering uncertain oil prices: A robust programming model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    9. Zhang, Yueling & Li, Junjie & Yang, Xiaoxiao, 2021. "Comprehensive competitiveness assessment of four coal-to-liquid routes and conventional oil refining route in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    10. Cardoso, J. & Silva, V. & Eusébio, D. & Brito, P. & Hall, M.J. & Tarelho, L., 2018. "Comparative scaling analysis of two different sized pilot-scale fluidized bed reactors operating with biomass substrates," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 520-535.
    11. Hosseinzadeh, Ahmad & Zhou, John L. & Li, Xiaowei & Afsari, Morteza & Altaee, Ali, 2022. "Techno-economic and environmental impact assessment of hydrogen production processes using bio-waste as renewable energy resource," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mevawala, Chirag & Jiang, Yuan & Bhattacharyya, Debangsu, 2017. "Plant-wide modeling and analysis of the shale gas to dimethyl ether (DME) process via direct and indirect synthesis routes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 163-180.
    2. Mevawala, Chirag & Jiang, Yuan & Bhattacharyya, Debangsu, 2019. "Techno-economic optimization of shale gas to dimethyl ether production processes via direct and indirect synthesis routes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 119-134.
    3. Jiang, Yuan & Liese, Eric & Zitney, Stephen E. & Bhattacharyya, Debangsu, 2018. "Design and dynamic modeling of printed circuit heat exchangers for supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton power cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 1019-1032.
    4. An, Hyunjin, 2017. "Forest Carbon Sequestration And Optimal Harvesting Decision Considering Southern Pine Beetle (Spb) Disturbance: A Real Option Approach," Journal of Rural Development/Nongchon-Gyeongje, Korea Rural Economic Institute, vol. 40(Special, ), December.
    5. Nguyen, Trung Thanh & Nghiem, Nhung, 2016. "Optimal forest rotation for carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation by farm income levels," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 185-194.
    6. Couture, Stéphane & Reynaud, Arnaud, 2011. "Forest management under fire risk when forest carbon sequestration has value," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(11), pages 2002-2011, September.
    7. Carvalho, Lara & Lundgren, Joakim & Wetterlund, Elisabeth & Wolf, Jens & Furusjö, Erik, 2018. "Methanol production via black liquor co-gasification with expanded raw material base – Techno-economic assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 570-584.
    8. Hoel, Michael & Holtsmark, Bjart & Holtsmark, Katinka, 2014. "Faustmann and the climate," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 192-210.
    9. Holtsmark, Bjart & Hoel, Michael & Holtsmark, Katinka, 2013. "Optimal harvest age considering multiple carbon pools – A comment," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 87-95.
    10. Huang, Yi & Yi, Qun & Wei, Guo-qiang & Kang, Jing-xian & Li, Wen-ying & Feng, Jie & Xie, Ke-chang, 2018. "Energy use, greenhouse gases emission and cost effectiveness of an integrated high– and low–temperature Fisher–Tropsch synthesis plant from a lifecycle viewpoint," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1009-1019.
    11. Yu, Jinna & Yao, Shunbo & Zhang, Bisheng, 2014. "Designing afforestation subsidies that account for the benefits of carbon sequestration: A case study using data from China's Loess Plateau," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 65-76.
    12. Wu, Handong & Gao, Lin & Jin, Hongguang & Li, Sheng, 2017. "Low-energy-penalty principles of CO2 capture in polygeneration systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 571-581.
    13. Hoseinzade, Leila & Adams, Thomas A., 2019. "Techno-economic and environmental analyses of a novel, sustainable process for production of liquid fuels using helium heat transfer," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 850-866.
    14. Yan, Linbo & Wang, Ziqi & Cao, Yang & He, Boshu, 2020. "Comparative evaluation of two biomass direct-fired power plants with carbon capture and sequestration," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 1188-1198.
    15. Parajuli, Rajan & Chang, Sun Joseph, 2012. "Carbon sequestration and uneven-aged management of loblolly pine stands in the Southern USA: A joint optimization approach," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 65-71.
    16. Mario C. López-Locés & Roger Z. Ríos-Mercado & Oscar Alberto Aguirre-Calderón & José Luis González-Velarde, 2020. "Towards sustainable timber harvesting of homogeneous stands: dynamic programming in synergy with forest growth simulation," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(3), pages 575-598, October.
    17. Sharma, Bijay P. & Khanna, Madhu & Miao, Ruiqing, 2022. "Designing Efficient Payments to Incentivize GHG Mitigation Using Energy Crops," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322361, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    18. Ding, Bingqing & Makowski, Marek & Nahorski, Zbigniew & Ren, Hongtao & Ma, Tieju, 2022. "Optimizing the technology pathway of China's liquid fuel production considering uncertain oil prices: A robust programming model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    19. Felardo, Jeff & Lippitt, Christopher D., 2016. "Spatial forest valuation: The role of location in determining attitudes toward payment for ecosystem services policies," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 158-167.
    20. Wu, Lin & Hou, Zhengmeng & Luo, Zhifeng & Huang, Liangchao & Xiong, Ying & Mehmood, Faisal & Liu, Jianhua & Sun, Wei & Xie, Yachen, 2023. "Efficiency assessment of underground biomethanation with hydrogen and carbon dioxide in depleted gas reservoirs: A biogeochemical simulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:141:y:2017:i:c:p:76-86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.