IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v138y2017icp942-953.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exergy assessment of a rotary kiln-electric furnace smelting of ferronickel alloy

Author

Listed:
  • Rong, W.
  • Li, B.
  • Liu, P.
  • Qi, F.

Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to assess the thermal performance of the RKEF process based on the actual operational data by using exergy analysis method. To identify the factors affecting exergy efficiency loss, exergy destruction caused by the main chemical reactions (fuel combustion, reduction reaction, decomposition reaction and slagging reaction) is investigated in detail. The results show that the energy efficiency of the RKEF process is 53.3% whereas the exergy efficiency is 15.7%, indicating a great potential for energy-saving. The overall exergy destruction accounts for 46.4% of the total exergy input, in which 24.8% is caused by chemical reactions. Moreover, the exergy destruction due to chemical reactions of rotary dryer, rotary kiln and electric furnace is 20.4%, 27.1% and 5.1%, respectively. It is also found that combustion is the dominant factor for the efficiency loss of rotary dryer and rotary kiln and slag with high temperature contributes most for the efficiency loss of electric furnace. Several suggestions for improving the thermal performance of RKEF system are proposed. The present work should do helpful effort for further improvement of the RKEF process.

Suggested Citation

  • Rong, W. & Li, B. & Liu, P. & Qi, F., 2017. "Exergy assessment of a rotary kiln-electric furnace smelting of ferronickel alloy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 942-953.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:138:y:2017:i:c:p:942-953
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544217312938
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.119?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michaelis, Peter & Jackson, Tim & Clift, Roland, 1998. "Exergy analysis of the life cycle of steel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 213-220.
    2. Morris, David R. & Szargut, Jan, 1986. "Standard chemical exergy of some elements and compounds on the planet earth," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 11(8), pages 733-755.
    3. Domínguez, Adriana & Valero, Alicia & Valero, Antonio, 2013. "Exergy accounting applied to metallurgical systems: The case of nickel processing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 37-45.
    4. BoroumandJazi, G. & Rismanchi, B. & Saidur, R., 2013. "A review on exergy analysis of industrial sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 198-203.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yali Wang & Haidong Yang & Kangkang Xu, 2020. "Thermal Performance Combined with Cooling System Parameters Study for a Roller Kiln Based on Energy-Exergy Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-31, July.
    2. Yu, Yang & Li, Baokuan & Wang, Changjun & Fang, Zhengzhe & Yang, Xiao & Tsukihashi, Fumitaka, 2019. "Evaluation and synergy of material and energy in the smelting process of ferrochrome pellets in steel belt sintering-submerged arc furnace," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 792-804.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Charalampos Michalakakis & Jeremy Fouillou & Richard C. Lupton & Ana Gonzalez Hernandez & Jonathan M. Cullen, 2021. "Calculating the chemical exergy of materials," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(2), pages 274-287, April.
    2. Whiting, Kai & Carmona, Luis Gabriel & Sousa, Tânia, 2017. "A review of the use of exergy to evaluate the sustainability of fossil fuels and non-fuel mineral depletion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 202-211.
    3. Areej Javed & Afaq Hassan & Muhammad Babar & Umair Azhar & Asim Riaz & Rana Mujahid & Tausif Ahmad & Muhammad Mubashir & Hooi Ren Lim & Pau Loke Show & Kuan Shiong Khoo, 2022. "A Comparison of the Exergy Efficiencies of Various Heat-Integrated Distillation Columns," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-15, September.
    4. Raúl Arango-Miranda & Robert Hausler & Rabindranarth Romero-López & Mathias Glaus & Sara Patricia Ibarra-Zavaleta, 2018. "An Overview of Energy and Exergy Analysis to the Industrial Sector, a Contribution to Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Song, Dan & Lin, Ling & Wu, Ye, 2019. "Extended exergy accounting for a typical cement industry in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 678-686.
    6. Feng, Chao & Zhu, Rong & Wei, Guangsheng & Dong, Kai & Xia, Tao, 2023. "Typical case of CO2 capture in Chinese iron and steel enterprises: Exergy analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    7. Bejan, Adrian, 2018. "Thermodynamics today," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 1208-1219.
    8. Hao, Xiaoqing & An, Haizhong & Qi, Hai & Gao, Xiangyun, 2016. "Evolution of the exergy flow network embodied in the global fossil energy trade: Based on complex network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1515-1522.
    9. Chen, G.Q. & Qi, Z.H., 2007. "Systems account of societal exergy utilization: China 2003," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 208(2), pages 102-118.
    10. Sogut, M. Ziya & Seçgin, Ömer & Ozkaynak, Süleyman, 2019. "Investigation of thermodynamics performance of alternative jet fuels based on decreasing threat of paraffinic and sulfur," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 1114-1120.
    11. Chen, Lingen & Yang, Bo & Feng, Huijun & Ge, Yanlin & Xia, Shaojun, 2020. "Performance optimization of an open simple-cycle gas turbine combined cooling, heating and power plant driven by basic oxygen furnace gas in China's steelmaking plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    12. Ezzat, M.F. & Dincer, I., 2019. "Development and exergetic assessment of a new hybrid vehicle incorporating gas turbine as powering option," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 112-119.
    13. Dong, Weijie & He, Guoqing & Cui, Quansheng & Sun, Wenwen & Hu, Zhenlong & Ahli raad, Erfan, 2022. "Self-scheduling of a novel hybrid GTSOFC unit in day-ahead energy and spinning reserve markets within ancillary services using a novel energy storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    14. Li, Fang-zhou & Kang, Jing-xian & Song, Yun-cai & Feng, Jie & Li, Wen-ying, 2020. "Thermodynamic feasibility for molybdenum-based gaseous oxides assisted looping coal gasification and its derived power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    15. Li, Shuangjun & Deng, Shuai & Zhao, Li & Zhao, Ruikai & Yuan, Xiangzhou, 2021. "Thermodynamic carbon pump 2.0: Elucidating energy efficiency through the thermodynamic cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PB).
    16. Chen, G.Q. & Chen, B., 2009. "Extended-exergy analysis of the Chinese society," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(9), pages 1127-1144.
    17. Qin, Shiyue & Chang, Shiyan & Yao, Qiang, 2018. "Modeling, thermodynamic and techno-economic analysis of coal-to-liquids process with different entrained flow coal gasifiers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 413-432.
    18. Jafarian, Mehdi & Arjomandi, Maziar & Nathan, Graham J., 2013. "A hybrid solar and chemical looping combustion system for solar thermal energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 671-678.
    19. Shao, Ling & Wu, Zi & Chen, G.Q., 2013. "Exergy based ecological footprint accounting for China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 83-96.
    20. Gonzalez Hernandez, Ana & Lupton, Richard C. & Williams, Chris & Cullen, Jonathan M., 2018. "Control data, Sankey diagrams, and exergy: Assessing the resource efficiency of industrial plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 232-245.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:138:y:2017:i:c:p:942-953. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.