IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v137y2017icp789-797.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal use of biomass in large-scale energy systems: Insights for energy policy

Author

Listed:
  • Codina Gironès, Víctor
  • Moret, Stefano
  • Peduzzi, Emanuela
  • Nasato, Marco
  • Maréchal, François

Abstract

Biomass chemical conversion processes allow the production of solid, liquid and gaseous biofuels, which can substitute almost any kind of fossil fuel and the associated greenhouse gas emissions. Despite this potential, high investment costs and conversion losses reaching up to 30–40% of the input biomass energy content are major barriers to a higher penetration of the chemical conversion processes. Thus, biomass is nowadays predominantly used for direct combustion. However, conversion losses of chemical processes may be compensated by the fact that biofuels can be used in more efficient technologies compared to standard raw biomass fuelled technologies. As an example, Synthetic Natural Gas (SNG) can be used in a cogeneration-heat pump system to produce heat, reaching an overall efficiency much higher compared to a wood boiler.

Suggested Citation

  • Codina Gironès, Víctor & Moret, Stefano & Peduzzi, Emanuela & Nasato, Marco & Maréchal, François, 2017. "Optimal use of biomass in large-scale energy systems: Insights for energy policy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 789-797.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:137:y:2017:i:c:p:789-797
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544217307831
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gassner, M. & Maréchal, F., 2008. "Thermo-economic optimisation of the integration of electrolysis in synthetic natural gas production from wood," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 189-198.
    2. Menten, Fabio & Tchung-Ming, Stéphane & Lorne, Daphné & Bouvart, Frédérique, 2015. "Lessons from the use of a long-term energy model for consequential life cycle assessment: The BTL case," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 942-960.
    3. Codina Gironès, Victor & Moret, Stefano & Maréchal, François & Favrat, Daniel, 2015. "Strategic energy planning for large-scale energy systems: A modelling framework to aid decision-making," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 173-186.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mauerhofer, A.M. & Schmid, J.C. & Benedikt, F. & Fuchs, J. & Müller, S. & Hofbauer, H., 2019. "Dual fluidized bed steam gasification: Change of product gas quality along the reactor height," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 1256-1272.
    2. Renato Lemm & Raphael Haymoz & Astrid Björnsen Gurung & Vanessa Burg & Tom Strebel & Oliver Thees, 2020. "Replacing Fossil Fuels and Nuclear Power with Renewable Energy: Utopia or Valid Option? A Swiss Case Study of Bioenergy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Ma, Y. & Li, Y.P. & Mei, H. & Nie, S. & Huang, G.H. & Li, Y.F. & Suo, C., 2024. "Potential way to plan China's power system (2021–2050) for climate change mitigation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    4. Frazer Musonda & Markus Millinger & Daniela Thrän, 2020. "Greenhouse Gas Abatement Potentials and Economics of Selected Biochemicals in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Zhang, Xinghui & Yang, Jiaojiao & Zhao, Xudong, 2018. "Optimal study of the rural house space heating systems employing the AHP and FCE methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 631-641.
    6. Linmao Ma & Jing Yu & Long Zhang, 2019. "An Analysis on Barriers to Biomass and Bioenergy Development in Rural China Using Intuitionistic Fuzzy Cognitive Map," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-23, April.
    7. Zang, Guiyan & Zhang, Jianan & Jia, Junxi & Lora, Electo Silva & Ratner, Albert, 2020. "Life cycle assessment of power-generation systems based on biomass integrated gasification combined cycles," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 336-346.
    8. Yuan, Xian Ming & Guo, Hang & Liu, Jia Xing & Ye, Fang & Ma, Chong Fang, 2018. "Influence of operation parameters on mode switching from electrolysis cell mode to fuel cell mode in a unitized regenerative fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1041-1051.
    9. Benedikt, F. & Schmid, J.C. & Fuchs, J. & Mauerhofer, A.M. & Müller, S. & Hofbauer, H., 2018. "Fuel flexible gasification with an advanced 100 kW dual fluidized bed steam gasification pilot plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 329-343.
    10. Zailan, Roziah & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Manan, Zainuddin Abdul & Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah Wan & Mohammadi-ivatloo, Behnam & Jamaluddin, Khairulnadzmi, 2021. "Malaysia scenario of biomass supply chain-cogeneration system and optimization modeling development: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    11. Piotr Ziembicki & Joachim Kozioł & Jan Bernasiński & Ireneusz Nowogoński, 2019. "Innovative System for Heat Recovery and Combustion Gas Cleaning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-13, November.
    12. Stanger, Lukas & Schirrer, Alexander & Benedikt, Florian & Bartik, Alexander & Jankovic, Stefan & Müller, Stefan & Kozek, Martin, 2023. "Dynamic modeling of dual fluidized bed steam gasification for control design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Østergaard, P.A. & Lund, H. & Thellufsen, J.Z. & Sorknæs, P. & Mathiesen, B.V., 2022. "Review and validation of EnergyPLAN," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    2. Gassner, Martin & Maréchal, François, 2009. "Thermodynamic comparison of the FICFB and Viking gasification concepts," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 1744-1753.
    3. Vincent Brémond & Emmanuel Hache & Tovonony Razafindrabe, 2015. "On the link between oil price and exchange rate : A time-varying VAR parameter approach," Working Papers hal-03206684, HAL.
    4. Plevin, Richard J. & Delucchi, Mark A. & O’Hare, Michael, 2017. "Fuel carbon intensity standards may not mitigate climate change," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 93-97.
    5. Kotowicz, Janusz & Bartela, Łukasz & Węcel, Daniel & Dubiel, Klaudia, 2017. "Hydrogen generator characteristics for storage of renewably-generated energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 156-171.
    6. Tobias Junne & Sonja Simon & Jens Buchgeister & Maximilian Saiger & Manuel Baumann & Martina Haase & Christina Wulf & Tobias Naegler, 2020. "Environmental Sustainability Assessment of Multi-Sectoral Energy Transformation Pathways: Methodological Approach and Case Study for Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-28, October.
    7. Dupoux, Marion, 2019. "The land use change time-accounting failure," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Albert Banal-Estañol & Jeremy Eckhause & Olivier Massol, 2015. "Incentives for early adoption of carbon capture technology: further considerations from a European perspective," Working Papers hal-02475485, HAL.
    9. Anthony Paris, 2016. "The Effect of Biofuels on the Link between Oil and Agricultural Commodity Prices: A Smooth Transition Cointegration Approach," EconomiX Working Papers 2016-5, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    10. Porcelli, Roberto & Gibon, Thomas & Marazza, Diego & Righi, Serena & Rugani, Benedetto, 2023. "Prospective environmental impact assessment and simulation applied to an emerging biowaste-based energy technology in Europe," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    11. Sannamari Pilpola & Vahid Arabzadeh & Jani Mikkola & Peter D. Lund, 2019. "Analyzing National and Local Pathways to Carbon-Neutrality from Technology, Emissions, and Resilience Perspectives—Case of Finland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, March.
    12. Plazas-Niño, F.A. & Ortiz-Pimiento, N.R. & Montes-Páez, E.G., 2022. "National energy system optimization modelling for decarbonization pathways analysis: A systematic literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    13. Copp, David A. & Nguyen, Tu A. & Byrne, Raymond H. & Chalamala, Babu R., 2022. "Optimal sizing of distributed energy resources for planning 100% renewable electric power systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    14. Iulia Stamatescu & Nicoleta Arghira & Ioana Făgărăşan & Grigore Stamatescu & Sergiu Stelian Iliescu & Vasile Calofir, 2017. "Decision Support System for a Low Voltage Renewable Energy System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, January.
    15. Paulino Martinez-Fernandez & Fernando deLlano-Paz & Anxo Calvo-Silvosa & Isabel Soares, 2019. "Assessing Renewable Energy Sources for Electricity (RES-E) Potential Using a CAPM-Analogous Multi-Stage Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, September.
    16. Clausen, Lasse R., 2017. "Energy efficient thermochemical conversion of very wet biomass to biofuels by integration of steam drying, steam electrolysis and gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 327-336.
    17. Cortés, E. & Rivera, W., 2010. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic optimization of a cogeneration pulp and paper mill plant including the use of a heat transformer," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 1289-1299.
    18. Johansson, Viktor & Lehtveer, Mariliis & Göransson, Lisa, 2019. "Biomass in the electricity system: A complement to variable renewables or a source of negative emissions?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 532-541.
    19. Levasseur, Annie & Bahn, Olivier & Beloin-Saint-Pierre, Didier & Marinova, Mariya & Vaillancourt, Kathleen, 2017. "Assessing butanol from integrated forest biorefinery: A combined techno-economic and life cycle approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 440-452.
    20. Moret, Stefano & Babonneau, Frédéric & Bierlaire, Michel & Maréchal, François, 2020. "Overcapacity in European power systems: Analysis and robust optimization approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:137:y:2017:i:c:p:789-797. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.