IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v12y1987i3p217-226.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design and test of an optimized secondary concentrator with potential cost benefits for solar energy conversion

Author

Listed:
  • O'Gallagher, J.
  • Winston, R.
  • Suresh, D.
  • Brown, C.T.

Abstract

Point-focus solar thermal concentrators usually employ only one concentrating mirror, a large-area paraboloidal dish or similar configuration with approximately the same optical properties. Substantial improvements can be achieved with recently developed two-stage configurations employing a non-imaging Compound Parabolic Concentrator (CPC)-type secondary. Such compound systems have the capability of achieving typically a four-fold increase over the concentration attainable by a single-stage primary of given optical quality. Recent efforts have been to design the secondary to relax the optical quality requirements for the large-area primary as much as possible, thereby potentially reducing system cost considerably. These new designs favor longer focal ratios than those characteristic of typical single-stage configurations. Two features of these designs make the approach particularly promising. First, the long focal length two-stage design always provides a fundamental increase in the tolerance for optical errors. Second, many primary fabrication and design techniques which seek to approximate a paraboloid become much better approximations in the long focal length limit. A conceptual design which illustrates these features and which could achieve a geometrical concentration of 215 × with a CPC secondary and a primary comprising only 60 flat mirror facets is described. To carry out an operational test a secondary concentrator suitable for use with a variety of long focal length primaries was designed and several different test models were fabricated. A series of optical and thermal performance measurements was carried out at the Advanced Components Test Facility (ACTF) operated by the Georgia Tech Research Institute. The results have established that thermal control can be readily achieved with simple passive means for moderate concentration and power ranges. Preliminary analysis yields values of approximately 90 ± 3% for the optical efficiency of the CPC secondaries with silver reflecting surfaces.

Suggested Citation

  • O'Gallagher, J. & Winston, R. & Suresh, D. & Brown, C.T., 1987. "Design and test of an optimized secondary concentrator with potential cost benefits for solar energy conversion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 217-226.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:12:y:1987:i:3:p:217-226
    DOI: 10.1016/0360-5442(87)90080-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0360544287900806
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/0360-5442(87)90080-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guiqiang, Li & Gang, Pei & Yuehong, Su & Jie, Ji & Riffat, Saffa B., 2013. "Experiment and simulation study on the flux distribution of lens-walled compound parabolic concentrator compared with mirror compound parabolic concentrator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 398-403.
    2. Balaji, Shanmugapriya & Reddy, K.S. & Sundararajan, T., 2016. "Optical modelling and performance analysis of a solar LFR receiver system with parabolic and involute secondary reflectors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1138-1151.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:12:y:1987:i:3:p:217-226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.