IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v114y2016icp1053-1062.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost, energy use and GHG emissions for forest biomass harvesting operations

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Fengli
  • Johnson, Dana M.
  • Wang, Jinjiang
  • Yu, Chunxia

Abstract

For forest-based biomass to become a significant contribution to the United States' energy portfolio, harvesting operations must be physically feasible and economically viable. An assessment of cost, energy and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of forest biomass harvesting was conducted. The assessment differentiates harvesting systems by cut-to-length and whole tree; harvest types of 30%, 70%, and 100% cut; and forest types of hardwoods, softwoods, mixed hardwood/softwood, and softwood plantations. Harvesting cost models were developed for economic assessment and life cycle energy and emission assessment was applied to calculate energy and emissions for different harvesting scenarios, considering material and energy inputs (machinery, diesel, etc.) and outputs (GHG emissions) for each harvesting process (felling, forwarding/skidding, etc.). The developed harvesting cost models and the life cycle energy and emission assessment method were applied in Michigan, U.S. using information collected from different sources. A sensitivity analysis was performed for selected input variables for the harvesting operations in order to explore their relative importance. The results indicated that productivity had the largest impact on harvesting cost followed by machinery purchase price, yearly scheduled hours, and expected utilization. Productivity and fuel use, as well as fuel factors, are the most influential environmental impacts of harvesting operations.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Fengli & Johnson, Dana M. & Wang, Jinjiang & Yu, Chunxia, 2016. "Cost, energy use and GHG emissions for forest biomass harvesting operations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1053-1062.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:114:y:2016:i:c:p:1053-1062
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.07.086
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544216310118
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2016.07.086?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kannan, R. & Leong, K.C. & Osman, R. & Ho, H.K., 2007. "Life cycle energy, emissions and cost inventory of power generation technologies in Singapore," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 702-715, May.
    2. Fengli Zhang & Dana M. Johnson & Jinjiang Wang, 2015. "Life-Cycle Energy and GHG Emissions of Forest Biomass Harvest and Transport for Biofuel Production in Michigan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-14, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Petra Hlaváčková & Sheku Kemoh Mansaray & Samuel Antwi Darkwah & Iva Živělová, 2024. "Applying the European Union (EU) assessment initiative of forest sustainability in Africa: A case study of the timber harvesting impact on the environment in Sierra Leone," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 70(2), pages 79-90.
    2. Pan, Yu & Liu, Liuchen & Zhu, Tong & Zhang, Tao & Zhang, Junying, 2017. "Feasibility analysis on distributed energy system of Chongming County based on RETScreen software," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 298-306.
    3. Ye, Fei & Li, Yina & Lin, Qiang & Zhan, Yuanzhu, 2017. "Modeling of China's cassava-based bioethanol supply chain operation and coordination," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 217-228.
    4. Wang, Z.X. & Li, H.Y. & Zhang, X.F. & Wang, L.W. & Du, S. & Fang, C., 2020. "Performance analysis on a novel micro-scale combined cooling, heating and power (CCHP) system for domestic utilization driven by biomass energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 1215-1232.
    5. Miriam Lettner & Pia Solt & Björn Rößiger & Daniela Pufky-Heinrich & Anna-Stiina Jääskeläinen & Peter Schwarzbauer & Franziska Hesser, 2018. "From Wood to Resin—Identifying Sustainability Levers through Hotspotting Lignin Valorisation Pathways," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, August.
    6. Man, Yi & Li, Jigeng & Hong, Mengna & Han, Yulin, 2020. "Energy transition for the low-carbon pulp and paper industry in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mollik, Sazib & Rashid, M.M. & Hasanuzzaman, M. & Karim, M.E. & Hosenuzzaman, M., 2016. "Prospects, progress, policies, and effects of rural electrification in Bangladesh," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 553-567.
    2. Odeh, Naser A. & Cockerill, Timothy T., 2008. "Life cycle GHG assessment of fossil fuel power plants with carbon capture and storage," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 367-380, January.
    3. Haji Esmaeili, Seyed Ali & Szmerekovsky, Joseph & Sobhani, Ahmad & Dybing, Alan & Peterson, Tim O., 2020. "Sustainable biomass supply chain network design with biomass switching incentives for first-generation bioethanol producers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    4. Hache, Emmanuel & Simoën, Marine & Seck, Gondia Sokhna & Bonnet, Clément & Jabberi, Aymen & Carcanague, Samuel, 2020. "The impact of future power generation on cement demand: An international and regional assessment based on climate scenarios," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 114-133.
    5. Raghava Rao Kommalapati & Iqbal Hossan & Venkata Sai Vamsi Botlaguduru & Hongbo Du & Ziaul Huque, 2018. "Life Cycle Environmental Impact of Biomass Co-Firing with Coal at a Power Plant in the Greater Houston Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, June.
    6. Kumar, Satish & Kwon, Hyouk-Tae & Choi, Kwang-Ho & Lim, Wonsub & Cho, Jae Hyun & Tak, Kyungjae & Moon, Il, 2011. "LNG: An eco-friendly cryogenic fuel for sustainable development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(12), pages 4264-4273.
    7. Cartelle Barros, Juan José & Lara Coira, Manuel & de la Cruz López, María Pilar & del Caño Gochi, Alfredo, 2015. "Assessing the global sustainability of different electricity generation systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 473-489.
    8. Akber, Muhammad Zeshan & Thaheem, Muhammad Jamaluddin & Arshad, Husnain, 2017. "Life cycle sustainability assessment of electricity generation in Pakistan: Policy regime for a sustainable energy mix," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 111-126.
    9. Marco Manzone & Fabrizio Gioelli & Paolo Balsari, 2017. "Kiwi Clear‐Cut: First Evaluation of Recovered Biomass for Energy Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-12, November.
    10. Ismail, Abdul Muhaimin & Ramirez-Iniguez, Roberto & Asif, Muhammad & Munir, Abu Bakar & Muhammad-Sukki, Firdaus, 2015. "Progress of solar photovoltaic in ASEAN countries: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 399-412.
    11. Cho, Young Sang & Kim, Jeom Han & Hong, Seong Uk & Kim, Yuri, 2012. "LCA application in the optimum design of high rise steel structures," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 3146-3153.
    12. Akbi, Amine & Yassaa, Noureddine & Boudjema, Rachid & Aliouat, Boualem, 2016. "A new method for cost of renewable energy production in Algeria: Integrate all benefits drawn from fossil fuel savings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 1150-1157.
    13. Xiaoxi Yan & Dong Jiang & Jingying Fu & Mengmeng Hao, 2018. "Assessment of Sweet Sorghum-Based Ethanol Potential in China within the Water–Energy–Food Nexus Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, April.
    14. Fan, Ying & Wu, Xudong & Wu, Xiaofang & Li, Chaohui & Yang, Qing & Hayat, Tasawar & Alsaedi, Ahmed & Wang, Ping & Chen, Guoqian, 2020. "A unified ecological assessment of a solar concentrating plant based on an integrated approach joining cosmic exergy analysis with ecological indicators," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    15. Ali, H. & Sanjaya, S. & Suryadi, B. & Weller, S.R., 2017. "Analysing CO2 emissions from Singapore's electricity generation sector: Strategies for 2020 and beyond," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 553-564.
    16. Xueliang Yuan & Leping Chen & Xuerou Sheng & Mengyue Liu & Yue Xu & Yuzhou Tang & Qingsong Wang & Qiao Ma & Jian Zuo, 2021. "Life Cycle Cost of Electricity Production: A Comparative Study of Coal-Fired, Biomass, and Wind Power in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-15, June.
    17. Abbasi, Tasneem & Abbasi, S.A., 2010. "Biomass energy and the environmental impacts associated with its production and utilization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 919-937, April.
    18. A. K. Pandey & B. Kalidasan & R. Reji Kumar & Saidur Rahman & V. V. Tyagi & Krismadinata & Zafar Said & P. Abdul Salam & Dranreb Earl Juanico & Jamal Uddin Ahamed & Kamal Sharma & M. Samykano & S. K. , 2022. "Solar Energy Utilization Techniques, Policies, Potentials, Progresses, Challenges and Recommendations in ASEAN Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-26, September.
    19. Santoyo-Castelazo, E. & Gujba, H. & Azapagic, A., 2011. "Life cycle assessment of electricity generation in Mexico," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 1488-1499.
    20. Turconi, Roberto & Boldrin, Alessio & Astrup, Thomas, 2013. "Life cycle assessment (LCA) of electricity generation technologies: Overview, comparability and limitations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 555-565.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:114:y:2016:i:c:p:1053-1062. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.