IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v38y2010i12p7604-7613.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The deployment of decentralised energy systems as part of the housing growth programme in the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Williams, Jo

Abstract

The housing growth programme could offer an opportunity for accelerating the deployment of decentralised renewable energy systems (DRES) in the UK. The Government hopes to leverage private sector investment into DRES as part of new housing projects. The aim of this paper is to assess whether current regulatory and funding frameworks are sufficient to achieve this. The question is explored by drawing on the experience of developers, local authorities, energy utilities and service companies operating in the largest housing growth region in the UK-Thames Gateway. Their experience suggests that the current low intervention approach will be insufficient to generate the shift required in both industries. In order to be more successful economic and regulatory instruments should focus on producers (house-builders and energy providers) rather than consumers (households). Tighter regulation is needed to ensure that producers have a responsibility to install DRES as part of new developments, to enable connection to the grid, to ensure a sustained financial return from investment and revenue is spent on the expansion of new renewable energy infrastructure. This regulatory framework must be under-pinned by substantial funds focused on producers. Greater intervention is needed if DRES is to be included in new housing development.

Suggested Citation

  • Williams, Jo, 2010. "The deployment of decentralised energy systems as part of the housing growth programme in the UK," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(12), pages 7604-7613, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:38:y:2010:i:12:p:7604-7613
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301-4215(09)00611-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diaz-Rainey, Ivan & Ashton, John K., 2008. "Stuck between a ROC and a hard place? Barriers to the take up of green energy in the UK," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 3043-3051, August.
    2. Jo Williams, 2008. "Green Houses for the Growth Region," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(1), pages 107-140.
    3. Lipp, Judith, 2007. "Lessons for effective renewable electricity policy from Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 5481-5495, November.
    4. Painuly, J.P, 2001. "Barriers to renewable energy penetration; a framework for analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 73-89.
    5. Trond Einar Pedersen & Finn Ørstavik & Markus Bugge, "undated". "Bare plankekjøring? Utvikling av en overordnet innovasjonsstrategi i BAE-næringen," STEP Report series 200321, The STEP Group, Studies in technology, innovation and economic policy.
    6. Wustenhagen, Rolf & Bilharz, Michael, 2006. "Green energy market development in Germany: effective public policy and emerging customer demand," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(13), pages 1681-1696, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Finney, Karen N. & Sharifi, Vida N. & Swithenbank, Jim, 2012. "The negative impacts of the global economic downturn on funding decentralised energy in the UK," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 290-300.
    2. Saunders, R.W. & Gross, R.J.K. & Wade, J., 2012. "Can premium tariffs for micro-generation and small scale renewable heat help the fuel poor, and if so, how? Case studies of innovative finance for community energy schemes in the UK," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 78-88.
    3. Balcombe, Paul & Rigby, Dan & Azapagic, Adisa, 2013. "Motivations and barriers associated with adopting microgeneration energy technologies in the UK," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 655-666.
    4. Imke Lammers & Thomas Hoppe, 2018. "Analysing the Institutional Setting of Local Renewable Energy Planning and Implementation in the EU: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, September.
    5. Leenheer, Jorna & de Nooij, Michiel & Sheikh, Omer, 2011. "Own power: Motives of having electricity without the energy company," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 5621-5629, September.
    6. Ambrose, Aimee & Eadson, Will & Pinder, James, 2016. "The role of actor-networks in the early stage mobilisation of low carbon heat networks," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 144-152.
    7. Joanna Williams, 2013. "The Role of Planning in Delivering Low-Carbon Urban Infrastructure," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 40(4), pages 683-706, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. L. Mundaca & H. Moncreiff, 2021. "New Perspectives on Green Energy Defaults," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 357-383, September.
    2. Wüstenhagen, Rolf & Menichetti, Emanuela, 2012. "Strategic choices for renewable energy investment: Conceptual framework and opportunities for further research," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 1-10.
    3. Asante, Dennis & He, Zheng & Adjei, Nana Osae & Asante, Bismark, 2020. "Exploring the barriers to renewable energy adoption utilising MULTIMOORA- EDAS method," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    4. Nicolini, Marcella & Tavoni, Massimo, 2017. "Are renewable energy subsidies effective? Evidence from Europe," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 412-423.
    5. Lüthi, Sonja & Wüstenhagen, Rolf, 2012. "The price of policy risk — Empirical insights from choice experiments with European photovoltaic project developers," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 1001-1011.
    6. Modhurima Dey Amin & Syed Badruddoza & Jill J. McCluskey, 2021. "Does conventional energy pricing induce innovation in renewable energy? New evidence from a nonlinear approach," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(2), pages 659-679, June.
    7. Aleksandra Sus & Rafał Trzaska & Maciej Wilczyński & Joanna Hołub-Iwan, 2023. "Strategies of Energy Suppliers and Consumer Awareness in Green Energy Optics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-23, February.
    8. Escoffier, Margaux & Hache, Emmanuel & Mignon, Valérie & Paris, Anthony, 2021. "Determinants of solar photovoltaic deployment in the electricity mix: Do oil prices really matter?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    9. Dalia Streimikiene & Tomas Baležentis & Artiom Volkov & Mangirdas Morkūnas & Agnė Žičkienė & Justas Streimikis, 2021. "Barriers and Drivers of Renewable Energy Penetration in Rural Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-28, October.
    10. Ivan Diaz‐Rainey & John K. Ashton, 2011. "Profiling potential green electricity tariff adopters: green consumerism as an environmental policy tool?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(7), pages 456-470, November.
    11. Narges Salehi Shahrabi & J. T. A. Bressers & M. L. Franco Garcia & Ali Asghar Pourezzat, 2021. "Policy Learning for Generating Green Electricity," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(1), pages 487-496.
    12. Sanya Carley & Elizabeth Baldwin & Lauren M. MacLean & Jennifer N. Brass, 2017. "Global Expansion of Renewable Energy Generation: An Analysis of Policy Instruments," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 68(2), pages 397-440, October.
    13. Hast, A. & Syri, S. & Jokiniemi, J. & Huuskonen, M. & Cross, S., 2015. "Review of green electricity products in the United Kingdom, Germany and Finland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1370-1384.
    14. Rahbauer, Sebastian & Menapace, Luisa & Menrad, Klaus & Decker, Thomas, 2016. "Adoption of green electricity by small- and medium-sized enterprises in Germany," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1185-1194.
    15. Sk Uddin & Ros Taplin & Xiaojiang Yu, 2010. "Towards a sustainable energy future—exploring current barriers and potential solutions in Thailand," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 63-87, February.
    16. Egli, Florian, 2020. "Renewable energy investment risk: An investigation of changes over time and the underlying drivers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    17. Kirsten Halsnæs & Amit Garg & John Christensen & Helene Føyn & Maryna Karavai & Emilio Rovere & Matthew Bramley & Xianli Zhu & Catherine Mitchell & Joyashree Roy & Kanako Tanaka & Hidefumi Katayama & , 2014. "Climate change mitigation policy paradigms—national objectives and alignments," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 45-71, January.
    18. Harald Rohracher, 2009. "Intermediaries and the Governance of Choice: The Case of Green Electricity Labelling," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(8), pages 2014-2028, August.
    19. Feurtey, Évariste & Ilinca, Adrian & Sakout, Anas & Saucier, Carol, 2016. "Institutional factors influencing strategic decision-making in energy policy; a case study of wind energy in France and Quebec (Canada)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1455-1470.
    20. Aquila, Giancarlo & Pamplona, Edson de Oliveira & Queiroz, Anderson Rodrigo de & Rotela Junior, Paulo & Fonseca, Marcelo Nunes, 2017. "An overview of incentive policies for the expansion of renewable energy generation in electricity power systems and the Brazilian experience," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1090-1098.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:38:y:2010:i:12:p:7604-7613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.