IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v26y1998i12p945-955.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The gender issue in energy project planning Welfare, empowerment or efficiency?

Author

Listed:
  • Skutsch, Margaret M

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Skutsch, Margaret M, 1998. "The gender issue in energy project planning Welfare, empowerment or efficiency?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(12), pages 945-955, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:26:y:1998:i:12:p:945-955
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301-4215(98)00037-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cecelski, Elizabeth W, 1995. "From Rio to Beijing : Engendering the energy debate," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 561-575, June.
    2. Mehretu, Assefa & Mutambirwa, Chris, 1992. "Gender differences in time and energy costs of distance for regular domestic chores in rural Zimbabwe: A case study in the Chiduku communal area," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 20(11), pages 1675-1683, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dóci, Gabriella & Vasileiadou, Eleftheria, 2015. "“Let׳s do it ourselves” Individual motivations for investing in renewables at community level," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 41-50.
    2. Yasmin, Nazia & Grundmann, Philipp, 2020. "Home-cooked energy transitions: Women empowerment and biogas-based cooking technology in Pakistan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    3. Gabriella Doci & Eleftheria Vasileiadou, 2014. "“Let’s do it ourselves”: Individual motivations for investing in renewables at community level," Working Papers 14-08, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies, revised Mar 2014.
    4. García, Victoria Gómez & Bartolomé, Mercedes Montero, 2010. "Rural electrification systems based on renewable energy: The social dimensions of an innovative technology," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 303-311.
    5. Antonella Mazzone, 2022. "Gender and Energy in International Development: Is There a Return of the ‘Feminization’ of Poverty Discourse?," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 65(1), pages 17-28, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cecile Jackson, 1998. "Gender, irrigation, and environment: Arguing for agency," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 15(4), pages 313-324, December.
    2. Farhar, Barbara C., 1998. "Gender and renewable energy: Policy, analysis, and market implications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 230-239.
    3. Alda-Vidal, Cecilia & Khalid, Rihab & Foulds, Chris & Royston, Sarah & Greene, Mary, 2023. "Gender imaginaries in energy transitions: How professionals construct and envision gender equity in energy access in the Global South," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    4. Feenstra, Mariëlle & Özerol, Gül, 2021. "Energy justice as a search light for gender-energy nexus: Towards a conceptual framework," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    5. Zimmerman, Frederick J., 2000. "Barriers to Participation of the Poor in South Africa's Land Redistribution," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 28(8), pages 1439-1460, August.
    6. Simon Batchelor & Ed Brown & Nigel Scott & Jon Leary, 2019. "Two Birds, One Stone—Reframing Cooking Energy Policies in Africa and Asia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, April.
    7. Diksha Arora & Codrina Rada, 2020. "Gender norms and intrahousehold allocation of labor in Mozambique: A CGE application to household and agricultural economics," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(2), pages 259-272, March.
    8. Nagata, Jason M. & Valeggia, Claudia R. & Barg, Frances K. & Bream, Kent D.W., 2009. "Body mass index, socio-economic status and socio-behavioral practices among Tz'utujil Maya women," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 96-106, March.
    9. Fox-Rushby, Julia A. & Foord, Frances, 1996. "Costs, effects and cost-effectiveness analysis of a mobile maternal health care service in West Kiang, The Gambia," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 123-143, February.
    10. Rahul Ranjan & Sudershan Singh, 2023. "Switching Towards LPG: Indian Household Perspectives," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 21(2), pages 417-435, June.
    11. Cynthia Neudoerffer, R. & Malhotra, Preeti & Venkata Ramana, P., 2001. "Participatory rural energy planning in India -- a policy context," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 371-381, April.
    12. Lena Winslott Hiselius & Annica Kronsell & Christian Dymén & Lena Smidfelt Rosqvist, 2019. "Investigating the Link between Transport Sustainability and the Representation of Women in Swedish Local Committees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-18, August.
    13. Ilse Marks, 1996. "Women and energy resources management," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 20(2), pages 145-152, May.
    14. Antonella Mazzone, 2022. "Gender and Energy in International Development: Is There a Return of the ‘Feminization’ of Poverty Discourse?," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 65(1), pages 17-28, March.
    15. Johnston, Deborah & Stevano, Sara & Malapit, Hazel J. & Hull, Elizabeth & Kadiyala, Suneetha, 2015. "Agriculture, gendered time use, and nutritional outcomes: A systematic review:," IFPRI discussion papers 1456, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:26:y:1998:i:12:p:945-955. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.