IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v182y2023ics0301421523003518.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does a mandatory cleaner production audit have a synergistic effect on reducing pollution and carbon emissions?

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Bingbing
  • Wang, Ning
  • Yan, Zhijun
  • Sun, Chuanwang

Abstract

The mandatory cleaner production audit (MCPA) is an important initiative to promote energy conservation, emission reduction and green transformation and upgrading of enterprises. This paper matches 16,841 enterprises that implemented MCPA between 2003 and 2012 to the Chinese Industrial Enterprise Database and the Chinese Enterprise Pollution Emission Database. And carrying out the MCPA as a quasi-natural experiment, a difference-in-differences model based on propensity score matching is used to identify the net effect of it on the reduction of enterprise sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions. The paper discovers that MCPA can significantly reduce the intensity of SO2 emissions, and this finding is robust to multiple scenarios. According to heterogeneity analysis, the MCPA is more conducive to reducing the intensity of SO2 emissions in domestic enterprises, enterprises with low financing constraints and heavily polluting industries. Mechanism tests show that MCPA can reduce SO2 emissions by optimising energy structure, increasing energy efficiency, and encouraging green process innovation. Further analysis reveals that the MCPA is an effective tool for achieving the synergistic effect of reducing SO2 and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in enterprises, and it serves the dual function of winning the pollution battle while also achieving the carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Bingbing & Wang, Ning & Yan, Zhijun & Sun, Chuanwang, 2023. "Does a mandatory cleaner production audit have a synergistic effect on reducing pollution and carbon emissions?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:182:y:2023:i:c:s0301421523003518
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113766
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421523003518
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113766?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eva Lyubich & Joseph S. Shapiro & Reed Walker, 2018. "Regulating Mismeasured Pollution: Implications of Firm Heterogeneity for Environmental Policy," Working Papers 18-03, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    2. Segal, Gill & Shaliastovich, Ivan & Yaron, Amir, 2015. "Good and bad uncertainty: Macroeconomic and financial market implications," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 369-397.
    3. Li Zhang & Yuhai Liu & Jin-Li Hu & Tiebin Liu & Sainan Liao, 2022. "Environmental Regulation and Firm Exports: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-25, January.
    4. Alun Gu & Fei Teng & Xiangzhao Feng, 2018. "Effects of pollution control measures on carbon emission reduction in China: evidence from the 11th and 12th Five-Year Plans," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 198-209, February.
    5. Rubashkina, Yana & Galeotti, Marzio & Verdolini, Elena, 2015. "Environmental regulation and competitiveness: Empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 288-300.
    6. Wu, Mingqin & Cao, Xun, 2021. "Greening the career incentive structure for local officials in China: Does less pollution increase the chances of promotion for Chinese local leaders?," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    7. Robert C. Feenstra & Zhiyuan Li & Miaojie Yu, 2014. "Exports and Credit Constraints under Incomplete Information: Theory and Evidence from China," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 96(4), pages 729-744, October.
    8. Barrows, Geoffrey & Ollivier, Hélène, 2018. "Cleaner firms or cleaner products? How product mix shapes emission intensity from manufacturing," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 134-158.
    9. Eva Lyubich & Joseph Shapiro & Reed Walker, 2018. "Regulating Mismeasured Pollution: Implications of Firm Heterogeneity for Environmental Policy," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 108, pages 136-142, May.
    10. Dongmin Kong & Xiandong Yang & Chen Liu & Wei Yang, 2020. "Business strategy and firm efforts on environmental protection: Evidence from China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 445-464, February.
    11. Chen, Yvonne Jie & Li, Pei & Lu, Yi, 2018. "Career concerns and multitasking local bureaucrats: Evidence of a target-based performance evaluation system in China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 84-101.
    12. Bombardini, Matilde & Li, Bingjing, 2020. "Trade, pollution and mortality in China," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    13. Jiaxiu He & Haoming Liu & Alberto Salvo, 2019. "Severe Air Pollution and Labor Productivity: Evidence from Industrial Towns in China," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 11(1), pages 173-201, January.
    14. Zhang, Bingbing & Yu, Lan & Sun, Chuanwang, 2022. "How does urban environmental legislation guide the green transition of enterprises? Based on the perspective of enterprises' green total factor productivity," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    15. Chang, I-Shin & Wu, Jing & Qiao, Huimin & Zhang, Zhilei, 2015. "The spatio-temporal approach to regional analysis on cleaner production in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1491-1503.
    16. André, Francisco J. & Sokri, Abderrahmane & Zaccour, Georges, 2011. "Public Disclosure Programs vs. traditional approaches for environmental regulation: Green goodwill and the policies of the firm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(1), pages 199-212, July.
    17. Forslid, Rikard & Okubo, Toshihiro & Ulltveit-Moe, Karen Helene, 2018. "Why are firms that export cleaner? International trade, abatement and environmental emissions," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 166-183.
    18. Liwen Liu & Caiquan Bai, 2022. "Environmental Regulation and Economic Development: Evidence from the River Chief System in China," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 8(04), pages 1-32, October.
    19. Zhang, Xiaohong & Wu, Liqian & Zhang, Rong & Deng, Shihuai & Zhang, Yanzong & Wu, Jun & Li, Yuanwei & Lin, Lili & Li, Li & Wang, Yinjun & Wang, Lilin, 2013. "Evaluating the relationships among economic growth, energy consumption, air emissions and air environmental protection investment in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 259-270.
    20. Eva Lyubich & Joseph Shapiro & Reed Walker, 2018. "Regulating Mismeasured Pollution: Implications of Firm Heterogeneity for Environmental Policy," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 108, pages 136-142, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Xi & Wang, Ziyan & Jiang, Siming & Li, Chongyi & Guo, Huanxiu, 2024. "Financial subsidy, government audit and new transportation technology: Evidence from the new energy vehicle pilot city program in China," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    2. Ge, Tao & Hao, Zixuan & Chen, Yuan & Chen, Zhanbo, 2024. "Energy intensity constraints and corporate investment strategies: Evidence from Chinese listed enterprises," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    3. Yuan, Kaihua & Cui, Jingyuan & Zhang, Haipeng & Gao, Xiang, 2023. "Do cleaner production standards upgrade the global value chain position of manufacturing enterprises? Empirical evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xi Lin & Ling-Yun He, 2023. "The More the Merrier? Evidence from Firm-Level Exports and Environmental Performance in China," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 84(1), pages 125-172, January.
    2. Xi Lin & Ling‐Yun He, 2023. "‘Going global’ and pollution in home country: Evidence from Chinese industrial firms," Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 1135-1174, October.
    3. Barrows, Geoffrey & Ollivier, Hélène, 2021. "Foreign demand, developing country exports, and CO2 emissions: Firm-level evidence from India," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    4. Xu, Hao & Xu, Jingxuan & Wang, Jie & Hou, Xiang, 2023. "Reduce production or increase efficiency? Hazardous air pollutants regulation, energy use, and the synergistic effect on industrial enterprises' carbon emission," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    5. Benatti, Nicola & Groiss, Martin & Kelly, Petra & Lopez-Garcia, Paloma, 2024. "The impact of environmental regulation on clean innovation: are there crowding out effects?," Working Paper Series 2946, European Central Bank.
    6. Wang, Huanhuan & Xiong, Jiaxin, 2022. "Governance on water pollution: Evidence from a new river regulatory system of China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    7. Huang, Ruting & Yao, Xin, 2024. "City size and energy efficiency of Chinese manufacturing firms: An empirical study from a city characteristic perspective," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    8. Dardati, Evangelina & Saygili, Meryem, 2021. "Are exporters cleaner? Another look at the trade-environment nexus," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    9. Leisner, Jonathan & Munch, Jakob R. & Nielsen, August Twile & Schaur, Georg, 2023. "The Impact of Offshoring and Import Competition on Firm-Level Carbon Emissions," IZA Discussion Papers 16556, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Jingbo Cui & On Kit Tam & Bei Wang & Yan Zhang, 2020. "The environmental effect of trade liberalization: Evidence from China's manufacturing firms," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(12), pages 3357-3383, December.
    11. Zhang, Bingbing & Wang, Yuan & Sun, Chuanwang, 2023. "Urban environmental legislation and corporate environmental performance: End governance or process control?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    12. Jonathan T. Hawkins-Pierot & Katherine R. H. Wagner, 2022. "Technology Lock-In and Optimal Carbon Pricing," CESifo Working Paper Series 9762, CESifo.
    13. Du, Kerui & Liu, Xueyue & Zhao, Cheng, 2023. "Environmental regulation mitigates energy rebound effect," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    14. Ritz, Robert A., 2022. "Global carbon price asymmetry," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    15. Zhang, Zhaowen & Jiang, Yaohui, 2022. "Can green public procurement change energy efficiency? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    16. Dong, Yan & Tian, Jinhuan & Wen, Qiang, 2022. "Environmental regulation and outward foreign direct investment: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    17. Wang, Qian & Zhu, Linke, 2021. "Environmental regulation, firm heterogeneity, and intra-industry reallocation," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    18. Wesley Blundell & Gautam Gowrisankaran & Ashley Langer, 2020. "Escalation of Scrutiny: The Gains from Dynamic Enforcement of Environmental Regulations," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(8), pages 2558-2585, August.
    19. Mehling, M. & Ritz, R., 2020. "Going beyond default intensities in an EU carbon border adjustment mechanism," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2087, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    20. Mark R Jacobsen & James M Sallee & Joseph S Shapiro & Arthur A van Benthem, 2023. "Regulating Untaxable Externalities: Are Vehicle Air Pollution Standards Effective and Efficient?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 138(3), pages 1907-1976.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:182:y:2023:i:c:s0301421523003518. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.