IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v132y2019icp797-802.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Amendments in Electricity Act 2003: Where the Gap Lies?

Author

Listed:
  • Agrawal, Atul
  • Tripathi, Gireesh Chandra

Abstract

Economic forces of the market drives any restructuring. Same is the case with power sector where presence of any economic inefficiency advocates the liberalization. Since the enactment of the ‘Electricity Act 2003’, Indian Power Sector had been through transformation phase to separate loss making vertically integrated ‘State Electricity Boards’ into ‘Generation’, ‘Transmission’ and ‘Distribution’ utilities. Fifteen years have been conceded to witness milestones in many directions. However, concerns pertaining to ‘monopolistic inefficiencies of distribution sector’ as well as ‘energy security’ could not be addressed properly by the principle act. This drew the attention of policy makers and they recommended amendments in the act to provide a policy push. Indian Power Sector has seen two documents for suggesting these amendments ‘Electricity Amendment Bill 2014’ and ‘Draft Electricity Amendment Act 2018’. This paper does analyze both of the documents for the similarities and differences and thus provides insights about the existing gaps. The paper recommends policy makers that how these gaps can be narrowed down before finally putting up the amendments in Indian Parliament.

Suggested Citation

  • Agrawal, Atul & Tripathi, Gireesh Chandra, 2019. "Amendments in Electricity Act 2003: Where the Gap Lies?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 797-802.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:132:y:2019:i:c:p:797-802
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.06.023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421519303933
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.06.023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mukherjee, Shilpi & Dhingra, Tarun & Sengupta, Anirban, 2017. "Status of Electricity Act, 2003: A systematic review of literature," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 237-248.
    2. Agrawal, Atul & Kumar, Anil & Rao, T. Joji, 2017. "Future of Indian Power Sector Reforms: Electricity Amendment Bill 2014," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 491-497.
    3. Sheoli Pargal & Sudeshna Ghosh Banerjee, 2014. "More Power to India : The Challenge of Electricity Distribution," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 18726.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Agrawal, Atul, 2022. "Real Time Market (RTM) at Indian power exchanges: Need, short term assessment and opportunities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    2. Das, Khanindra Ch. & Mahalik, Mantu Kumar, 2023. "Renewable energy use and export performance of manufacturing firms: Panel evidence from six industries in India," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    3. Kumar, Shashwat, 2022. "Taking root: Independent Regulatory Agency model of regulation in Indian electricity sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    4. Prakash, Vrishab & Ghosh, Sajal & Kanjilal, Kakali, 2020. "Costs of avoided carbon emission from thermal and renewable sources of power in India and policy implications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    5. Srivastava, Govind & Kathuria, Vinish, 2020. "Impact of corporate governance norms on the performance of Indian utilities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    6. Rashmita Saran & Bharath Supra & G. P. Girish & Sweta Singh, 2024. "Has Real Time Spot Electricity Market in India Impacted Day-Ahead Spot Electricity Market?," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(5), pages 347-355, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kumar, Shashwat, 2022. "Taking root: Independent Regulatory Agency model of regulation in Indian electricity sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    2. Verma, Mandhir Kumar & Mukherjee, V. & Kumar Yadav, Vinod & Ghosh, Santosh, 2020. "Indian power distribution sector reforms: A critical review," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    3. Sarangi, Gopal K. & Pradhan, Abhilas Kumar & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad, 2021. "Performance assessment of state-owned electricity distribution utilities in India," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 516-531.
    4. Fahad Bin Abdullah & Rizwan Iqbal & Falak Shad Memon & Sadique Ahmad & Mohammed A. El-Affendi, 2023. "Advancing Sustainability in the Power Distribution Industry: An Integrated Framework Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-28, May.
    5. Ronita Bardhan & Ramit Debnath & Arnab Jana, 2019. "Evolution of sustainable energy policies in India since 1947: A review," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(5), September.
    6. Agrawal, Atul, 2022. "Real Time Market (RTM) at Indian power exchanges: Need, short term assessment and opportunities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    7. Robin Burgess & Michael Greenstone & Nicholas Ryan & Anant Sudarshan, 2020. "The Consequences of Treating Electricity as a Right," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 34(1), pages 145-169, Winter.
    8. Jamasb, Tooraj & Thakur, Tripta & Bag, Baidyanath, 2018. "Smart electricity distribution networks, business models, and application for developing countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 22-29.
    9. Singh, Anoop & Jamasb, Tooraj & Nepal, Rabindra & Toman, Michael, 2018. "Electricity cooperation in South Asia: Barriers to cross-border trade," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 741-748.
    10. Saraswat, S.K. & Digalwar, Abhijeet K., 2021. "Evaluation of energy alternatives for sustainable development of energy sector in India: An integrated Shannon’s entropy fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 58-74.
    11. Jain, Sourabh & Jain, Nikunj Kumar, 2020. "Cost of electricity banking under open-access arrangement: A case of solar electricity in India," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 776-788.
    12. Criqui, Laure & Zérah, Marie-Hélène, 2015. "Lost in transition? Comparing strategies of electricity companies in Delhi," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 179-188.
    13. Sedai, Ashish Kumar & Vasudevan, Ramaa & Pena, Anita Alves & Miller, Ray, 2021. "Does reliable electrification reduce gender differences? Evidence from India," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 580-601.
    14. Nihit Goyal, 2021. "Limited Demand or Unreliable Supply? A Bibliometric Review and Computational Text Analysis of Research on Energy Policy in India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-23, December.
    15. Suryadeepto Nag & David I. Stern, 2023. "Are the benefits of electrification realized only in the long run? Evidence from rural India," Departmental Working Papers 2023-08, The Australian National University, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics.
    16. Ghosh, Santosh & Yadav, Vinod Kumar & Mukherjee, Vivekananda & Gupta, Shubham, 2021. "Three decades of Indian power-sector reform:A critical assessment," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    17. Patyal, Vishal Singh & Kumar, Ravi & Lamba, Kuldeep & Maheshwari, Sunil, 2023. "Performance evaluation of Indian electricity distribution companies: An integrated DEA-IRP-TOPSIS approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    18. Liao, Chuan & Erbaugh, James T. & Kelly, Allison C. & Agrawal, Arun, 2021. "Clean energy transitions and human well-being outcomes in Lower and Middle Income Countries: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    19. Independent Evaluation Group, 2016. "Financial Viability of the Electricity Sector in Developing Countries," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 25174.
    20. Garg, Amit & Naswa, Prakriti & Shukla, P.R., 2015. "Energy infrastructure in India: Profile and risks under climate change," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 226-238.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:132:y:2019:i:c:p:797-802. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.