IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v110y2017icp548-558.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On economic inefficiency of European Inter-TSO compensation mechanism

Author

Listed:
  • Sabolić, Dubravko

Abstract

Economic inefficiency of European Inter-Transmission System Operator (ITC) mechanism is demonstrated by means of statistical analysis of a time series of natural quantities (production, consumption, and exchange of energy), as well as by devising a simple model that shows that the current system misallocates relevant costs between transmission system operators (TSOs) involved. Then, the reasons for this apparent inefficiency are discussed. It is concluded that under existing EU policy rules in electricity sector it is not possible to construct a compensation mechanism that would perform a correct reallocation of external costs incurred by energy transits among interconnected networks operated by different TSOs. Then, simple microeconomic models that exhibit a correct compensation of costs, with rules of the game set differently than by today's EU regulatory framework, are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Sabolić, Dubravko, 2017. "On economic inefficiency of European Inter-TSO compensation mechanism," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 548-558.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:110:y:2017:i:c:p:548-558
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.08.047
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421517305530
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.08.047?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scharff, Richard & Amelin, Mikael, 2016. "Trading behaviour on the continuous intraday market Elbas," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 544-557.
    2. Mastropietro, Paolo & Rodilla, Pablo & Batlle, Carlos, 2015. "National capacity mechanisms in the European internal energy market: Opening the doors to neighbours," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 38-47.
    3. Helm, Dieter, 2014. "The European framework for energy and climate policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 29-35.
    4. Celina Yulo Loyzaga & Zin Bo Htet & Vishalini Chandara Sagar, 2016. "Inter-Regional Comparisons of Humanitarian Action," Working Papers id:10912, eSocialSciences.
    5. Oseni, Musiliu O. & Pollitt, Michael G., 2016. "The promotion of regional integration of electricity markets: Lessons for developing countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 628-638.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Churkin, Andrey & Bialek, Janusz & Pozo, David & Sauma, Enzo & Korgin, Nikolay, 2021. "Review of Cooperative Game Theory applications in power system expansion planning," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    2. Churkin, Andrey & Pozo, David & Bialek, Janusz & Korgin, Nikolay & Sauma, Enzo, 2019. "Can cross-border transmission expansion lead to fair and stable cooperation? Northeast Asia case analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brijs, Tom & De Jonghe, Cedric & Hobbs, Benjamin F. & Belmans, Ronnie, 2017. "Interactions between the design of short-term electricity markets in the CWE region and power system flexibility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 36-51.
    2. Hasan, Mudassar & Arif, Muhammad & Naeem, Muhammad Abubakr & Ngo, Quang-Thanh & Taghizadeh–Hesary, Farhad, 2021. "Time-frequency connectedness between Asian electricity sectors," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 208-224.
    3. Funcke, Simon & Bauknecht, Dierk, 2016. "Typology of centralised and decentralised visions for electricity infrastructure," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 67-74.
    4. Koltsaklis, Nikolaos E. & Nazos, Konstantinos, 2017. "A stochastic MILP energy planning model incorporating power market dynamics," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1364-1383.
    5. Griffiths, Steven, 2017. "A review and assessment of energy policy in the Middle East and North Africa region," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 249-269.
    6. Do, Hung Xuan & Nepal, Rabindra & Jamasb, Tooraj, 2020. "Electricity market integration, decarbonisation and security of supply: Dynamic volatility connectedness in the Irish and Great Britain markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    7. Ocker, Fabian & Jaenisch, Vincent, 2020. "The way towards European electricity intraday auctions – Status quo and future developments," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    8. Andreas Welling, 2017. "Green Finance: Recent developments, characteristics and important actors," FEMM Working Papers 170002, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Faculty of Economics and Management.
    9. Adamczyk, Janusz & Dylewski, Robert, 2017. "The impact of thermal insulation investments on sustainability in the construction sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 421-429.
    10. Liao, Qi & Tu, Renfu & Zhang, Wan & Wang, Bohong & Liang, Yongtu & Zhang, Haoran, 2023. "Auction design for capacity allocation in the petroleum pipeline under fair opening," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    11. Mastropietro, Paolo & Rodilla, Pablo & Rivier, Michel & Batlle, Carlos, 2024. "Reliability options: Regulatory recommendations for the next generation of capacity remuneration mechanisms," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    12. Hesaraki, Arefeh & Holmberg, Sture & Haghighat, Fariborz, 2015. "Seasonal thermal energy storage with heat pumps and low temperatures in building projects—A comparative review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1199-1213.
    13. Gugler, Klaus & Haxhimusa, Adhurim, 2019. "Market integration and technology mix: Evidence from the German and French electricity markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 30-46.
    14. Adamczyk, Janusz & Dylewski, Robert, 2017. "Changes in heat transfer coefficients in Poland and their impact on energy demand - an environmental and economic assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 530-538.
    15. Timo Kuosmanen & Andrew L. Johnson, 2020. "Conditional Yardstick Competition in Energy Regulation," The Energy Journal, , vol. 41(1_suppl), pages 67-92, June.
    16. Yashna Devi Beeharry & Girish Bekaroo & Chandradeo Bokhoree & Michael Robert Phillips, 2022. "Impacts of sea-level rise on coastal zones of Mauritius: insights following calculation of a coastal vulnerability index," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(1), pages 27-55, October.
    17. Nikolaus Graf von Luckner & Rüdiger Kiesel, 2021. "Modeling Market Order Arrivals on the German Intraday Electricity Market with the Hawkes Process," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-31, April.
    18. Koch, Christopher & Hirth, Lion, 2019. "Short-term electricity trading for system balancing: An empirical analysis of the role of intraday trading in balancing Germany's electricity system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    19. Hu, Xiao & Jaraitė, Jūratė & Kažukauskas, Andrius, 2021. "The effects of wind power on electricity markets: A case study of the Swedish intraday market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    20. Loisel, Rodica & Simon, Corentin, 2021. "Market strategies for large-scale energy storage: Vertical integration versus stand-alone player," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    L52; L94; L98; Inter-Transmission System Operator Compensation (ITC) mechanism; EU electricity sector regulatory framework; Economic inefficiency of ITC mechanism; Correct reallocation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L52 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Industrial Policy; Sectoral Planning Methods
    • L94 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Electric Utilities
    • L98 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:110:y:2017:i:c:p:548-558. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.