IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v101y2017icp711-722.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Central European attitudes towards Chinese energy investments: The cases of Poland, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic

Author

Listed:
  • Turcsanyi, Richard Q.

Abstract

This article builds on Europe-wide knowledge of EU-China energy investment relations and discusses the cases of three Central European countries’ attitudes towards Chinese energy investments. It focuses on how Chinese investments are perceived compared to investments from other countries, and how the energy sector is perceived compared to other sectors. Media analysis, interviews with experts, and semi-structured questionnaires were used as data sources. It was discovered that these three countries dislike foreign control over strategic assets and Chinese energy investments are seen as falling into this category. The discourse frames on the general level fluctuate between beneficial and threatening at both the political and economic levels, yet the benefits are seen as greater than any potential threats in all three countries. Energy security frames are only just beginning to be discussed within national discourses about Chinese energy investments. In Poland, the Chinese presence in the energy sector is framed as an issue of availability, affordability, and efficiency, and is related to Polish plans for maximizing efficient use of local coal resources. In the Czech Republic and Slovakia, China is often perceived ideologically and only the energy frame of environmental stewardship is present in a minor way.

Suggested Citation

  • Turcsanyi, Richard Q., 2017. "Central European attitudes towards Chinese energy investments: The cases of Poland, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 711-722.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:101:y:2017:i:c:p:711-722
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142151630502X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.035?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. He, Xiaoping, 2015. "Regional differences in China's CO2 abatement cost," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 145-152.
    2. Rudolf Fürst & Gabriela Pleschová, 2010. "Czech and Slovak Relations with China: Contenders for China's Favour," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(8), pages 1363-1381.
    3. ., 2015. "A simulation model of the European defence industry," Chapters, in: Innovation and Liberalization in the European Defence Sector, chapter 5, pages 89-117, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. N/A, 2015. "Featured Graphic. If Europe were a Country …," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(3), pages 501-502, March.
    5. Corner, Adam & Venables, Dan & Spence, Alexa & Poortinga, Wouter & Demski, Christina & Pidgeon, Nick, 2011. "Nuclear power, climate change and energy security: Exploring British public attitudes," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 4823-4833, September.
    6. ., 2015. "Conceptual explanation of European Union law," Chapters, in: Understanding the Nature of Law, chapter 6, pages 135-160, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Wade Jacoby, 2014. "Different cases, different faces: Chinese investment in Central and Eastern Europe," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 199-214, March.
    8. Thomas, Stephen, 2016. "The Hinkley Point decision: An analysis of the policy process," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 421-431.
    9. Sarmiza Pencea & Iulia Monica Oehler-Şincai, 2014. "Chinese Outward Direct Investment In Central And Eastern European Countries. A Romanian Perspective," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 9(2), pages 45-72, June.
    10. Sarmiza Pencea & Iulia Monica Oehler-Sincai, 2014. "Chinese Outward Direct Investment in Central and Eastern European Countries: a Comparative Analysis," Knowledge Horizons - Economics, Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy Bucharest,"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University Bucharest, vol. 6(2), pages 34-43, June.
    11. Kruyt, Bert & van Vuuren, D.P. & de Vries, H.J.M. & Groenenberg, H., 2009. "Indicators for energy security," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 2166-2181, June.
    12. N/A, 2009. "3rd European Fair on Education for Sustainable Development," Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, , vol. 3(1), pages 11-12, March.
    13. Fan He & Panpan Yang, 2015. "China's Role in Asia's Free Trade Agreements," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 2(2), pages 416-424, May.
    14. Cheng, Yahao & Gao, Zhifeng & Seale, James L. Jr., 2015. "Changing Structure of China's Meat Imports," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 212717, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Stoutenborough, James W. & Sturgess, Shelbi G. & Vedlitz, Arnold, 2013. "Knowledge, risk, and policy support: Public perceptions of nuclear power," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 176-184.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lai Suetyi & Cai Yidong, 2022. "Mapping perception of China in Central and Eastern Europe," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 305-327, September.
    2. Suetyi LAI, 2023. "Not seeing eye to eye: perception of the China-EU economic relationship," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 137-154, June.
    3. Hongxing Cao & Huirong Zhan & Yuan Wang & Ziyao Wei, 2021. "Sino-Bulgarian Economic Relations in the Post Pandemic World," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 2, pages 177-196, July.
    4. Sirin, Selahattin Murat, 2017. "Foreign direct investments (FDIs) in Turkish power sector: A discussion on investments, opportunities and risks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1367-1377.
    5. Sirma Altun & Ceren Ergenc, 2023. "The EU and China in the global climate regime: a dialectical collaboration-competition relationship," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 437-457, September.
    6. Cheche Duan & Yicheng Zhou & Dehong Shen & Shengqiao Lin & Wei Gong & József Popp & Judit Oláh, 2021. "The Misunderstanding of China’s Investment, and a Clarification: “Faustian Bargain” or “Good Bargain”? On the OFDI Data of Central and Eastern Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-25, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Göbel, Christine & Teitscheid, Petra & Friedrich, Silke & Langen, Nina & Speck, Melanie & Engelmann, Tobias & Rohn, Holger, 2017. "Implementing Sustainable Business Models in the Hospitality Sector with the Help of a Mission Statement," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 8(2), March.
    2. Göbel, Christine & Teitscheid, Petra & Friedrich, Silke & Langen, Nina & Speck, Melanie & Engelmann, Tobias & Rohn, Holger, 2017. "Implementing Sustainable Business Models in the Hospitality Sector with the Help of a Mission Statement," 2018 International European Forum (163rd EAAE Seminar), February 5-9, 2018, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 276926, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    3. Stephanos Papadamou & Nikolaos A. Kyriazis & Lydia Mermigka, 2017. "Japanese Mutual Funds before and after the Crisis Outburst: A Style- and Performance-Analysis," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Eraslan, Sercan, 2016. "Safe-haven demand for housing in London," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 482-493.
    5. Anselmsson, Johan, 2016. "Effects of shopping centre re-investments and improvements on sales and visit growth," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 139-150.
    6. Gupta, Kuhika & Nowlin, Matthew C. & Ripberger, Joseph T. & Jenkins-Smith, Hank C. & Silva, Carol L., 2019. "Tracking the nuclear ‘mood’ in the United States: Introducing a long term measure of public opinion about nuclear energy using aggregate survey data," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    7. Govindan, Mini & Ram Mohan, M.P., 2021. "Exploring Gender Perceptions of Nuclear Energy in India," IIMA Working Papers WP 2021-11-06, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    8. repec:unt:esctis:tis17 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Okubo, Toshihiro & Narita, Daiju & Rehdanz, Katrin & Schröder, Carsten, 2020. "Preferences for Nuclear Power in Post-Fukushima Japan: Evidence from a Large Nationwide Household Survey," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 13(11).
    10. Yukiko Omata & Hajime Katayama & Toshi. H. Arimura, 2017. "Same concerns, same responses? A Bayesian quantile regression analysis of the determinants for supporting nuclear power generation in Japan," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 19(3), pages 581-608, July.
    11. repec:unt:esctis:tis18 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Han, Y. & Lam, J. & Guo, P. & Gou, Z., 2019. "What Predicts Government Trustworthiness in Cross-border HK-Guangdong Nuclear Safety Emergency Governance?," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1989, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    13. Sarmiza Pencea, 2017. "Romania-China Trade And Investment Relations Against The Backdrop Of “One Belt,One Road” Strategy," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 12(2), pages 17-28, June.
    14. Bohdanowicz, Zbigniew & Łopaciuk-Gonczaryk, Beata & Gajda, Paweł & Rajewski, Adam, 2023. "Support for nuclear power and proenvironmental attitudes: The cases of Germany and Poland," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    15. Fischhendler, Itay & Nathan, Daniel, 2014. "In the name of energy security: the struggle over the exportation of Israeli natural gas," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 152-162.
    16. Anshelm, Jonas & Simon, Haikola, 2016. "Power production and environmental opinions – Environmentally motivated resistance to wind power in Sweden," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1545-1555.
    17. Sarmiza Pencea & Iulia Monica Oehler-Şincai, 2015. "Romania, Strategic Partner in China-CEE Relations," Global Economic Observer, "Nicolae Titulescu" University of Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Sciences;Institute for World Economy of the Romanian Academy, vol. 3(1), pages 44-55, May.
    18. Nunes, J. & Silva, Pedro D. & Andrade, L.P. & Gaspar, Pedro D., 2016. "Key points on the energy sustainable development of the food industry – Case study of the Portuguese sausages industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 393-411.
    19. Lam, J. & Li, V. & Reiner, D. & Han, Y., 2018. "Trust in Government and Effective Nuclear Safety Governance in Great Britain," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1827, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    20. Maxim, Alexandru, 2014. "Sustainability assessment of electricity generation technologies using weighted multi-criteria decision analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 284-297.
    21. Seyedashkan Madani, 2021. "The BRI and its Implications for China s Energy Security: The Four As Model Perspective," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(4), pages 549-559.
    22. Guo, Yue & Ren, Tao, 2017. "When it is unfamiliar to me: Local acceptance of planned nuclear power plants in China in the post-fukushima era," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 113-125.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:101:y:2017:i:c:p:711-722. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.