IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v138y2024ics0140988324005577.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A note on the uniqueness of Nash–Cournot equilibria in an oligopolistic energy market with renewable generation and demand uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Chaiken, Benjamin
  • Duggan, Joseph E.

Abstract

This work explores the uniqueness of Nash–Cournot equilibria in wholesale electricity markets with both thermal and renewable generation in the presence of demand uncertainty. Criteria guaranteeing a unique equilibrium are derived for an energy market where each firm owns a share of renewable generation. This work expands upon the uniqueness results proven by Lagerlöf (2006) to incorporate the presence of renewable generation into the market in the manner of Acemoglu et al. (2017). A numerical case study is used to illustrate the potential impacts of increasing renewable generation on equilibrium uniqueness and directions for future research are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Chaiken, Benjamin & Duggan, Joseph E., 2024. "A note on the uniqueness of Nash–Cournot equilibria in an oligopolistic energy market with renewable generation and demand uncertainty," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:138:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324005577
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107849
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324005577
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107849?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Nash–Cournot equilibrium; Electricity market design; Renewable generation; Uncertainty;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C72 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Noncooperative Games
    • D43 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection
    • L94 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Electric Utilities
    • Q41 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Demand and Supply; Prices

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:138:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324005577. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.