IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v131y2024ics0140988324000409.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy ETF performance: The role of fossil fuels

Author

Listed:
  • D’Ecclesia, Rita Laura
  • Morelli, Giacomo
  • Stefanelli, Kevyn

Abstract

The Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) affected the financial markets since the year 2000. Asset managers and investors consider Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) as a popular investment vehicle that represents a source of growth for sustainable strategies. Clean Energy ETFs (CE ETF) are funds that invest in stocks of alternative energy sectors such as solar energy, wind, hydroelectric, and geothermal companies. In 2022, CE ETF recorded a rate of return equal to 3.3% in a quarter. We investigate the role of sustainable ETFs in portfolio management analyzing features of the most capitalized ETFs over the last decade (2012–2022), distinguishing between CE ETFs and Fossil Fuel ETFs (FF ETFs). Using daily quotes, we compare the performance of various mean variance portfolios each including only CE ETFs, only FF ETFs, and a mix of the two. We show that the CE ETFs portfolio does not always provide a better risk–return trade-off, but it often beats the FF one. Given the time-varying features of the volatility of ETF returns, we use a GARCH framework and analyze the various portfolios’ performance in different sub-periods, to take into account the pandemic crisis, the Paris Agreement, and the Ukranian conflict. We find that portfolios’ performance is highly affected by i) market conditions, and ii) sustainability-related events. In addition, with respect to our observation period, we show that the exclusion of FF ETFs does not decrease the profitability of the portfolios.

Suggested Citation

  • D’Ecclesia, Rita Laura & Morelli, Giacomo & Stefanelli, Kevyn, 2024. "Energy ETF performance: The role of fossil fuels," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:131:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324000409
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107332
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324000409
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107332?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Monasterolo, Irene & de Angelis, Luca, 2020. "Blind to carbon risk? An analysis of stock market reaction to the Paris Agreement," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    2. José Luis Miralles‐Quirós & María Mar Miralles‐Quirós & José Manuel Nogueira, 2019. "Diversification benefits of using exchange‐traded funds in compliance to the sustainable development goals," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 244-255, January.
    3. Damien Wallace & Ron McIver, 2019. "The Effects of Environmental Announcements on Exchange Traded Funds," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(2), pages 289-307, January.
    4. Ramiah, Vikash & Martin, Belinda & Moosa, Imad, 2013. "How does the stock market react to the announcement of green policies?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 1747-1758.
    5. Jushan Bai & Pierre Perron, 1998. "Estimating and Testing Linear Models with Multiple Structural Changes," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 66(1), pages 47-78, January.
    6. Dutta, Anupam & Bouri, Elie & Saeed, Tareq & Vo, Xuan Vinh, 2020. "Impact of energy sector volatility on clean energy assets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    7. Kanamura, Takashi, 2020. "Are green bonds environmentally friendly and good performing assets?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    8. Jushan Bai & Pierre Perron, 2003. "Computation and analysis of multiple structural change models," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(1), pages 1-22.
    9. Alexopoulos, Thomas A., 2018. "To trust or not to trust? A comparative study of conventional and clean energy exchange-traded funds," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 97-107.
    10. Fahmy, Hany, 2022. "The rise in investors’ awareness of climate risks after the Paris Agreement and the clean energy-oil-technology prices nexus," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    11. Fahmy, Hany, 2022. "Clean energy deserves to be an asset class: A volatility-reward analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    12. I. El Ouadghiri & K. Guesmi & Jonathan Peillex & A. Ziegler, 2021. "Public Attention to Environmental Issues and Stock Market Returns," Post-Print hal-03678291, HAL.
    13. Ardia, David & Boudt, Kris, 2015. "Testing equality of modified Sharpe ratios," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 13(C), pages 97-104.
    14. El Ouadghiri, Imane & Guesmi, Khaled & Peillex, Jonathan & Ziegler, Andreas, 2021. "Public Attention to Environmental Issues and Stock Market Returns," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    15. Engle, Robert, 2002. "Dynamic Conditional Correlation: A Simple Class of Multivariate Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity Models," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 20(3), pages 339-350, July.
    16. Carla Oliveira Henriques & Maria Elisabete Neves & Licínio Castelão & Duc Khuong Nguyen, 2022. "Assessing the performance of exchange traded funds in the energy sector: a hybrid DEA multiobjective linear programming approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 313(1), pages 341-366, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Birindelli, Giuliana & Miazza, Aline & Paimanova, Viktoriia & Palea, Vera, 2023. "Just “blah blah blah”? Stock market expectations and reactions to COP26," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    2. Liu, Haiyue & Wang, Yile & Shi, Xiaoshuang & Pang, Lina, 2022. "How do environmental policies affect capital market reactions? Evidence from China's construction waste treatment policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    3. Henryk Gurgul & Robert Syrek, 2023. "Contagion between selected European indexes during the Covid-19 pandemic," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 33(1), pages 47-59.
    4. Guglielmo Maria Caporale & Menelaos Karanasos & Stavroula Yfanti, 2019. "Macro-Financial Linkages in the High-Frequency Domain: The Effects of Uncertainty on Realized Volatility," CESifo Working Paper Series 8000, CESifo.
    5. Guoxiang Xu & Wangfeng Gao, 2019. "Financial Risk Contagion in Stock Markets: Causality and Measurement Aspects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, March.
    6. Charfeddine, Lanouar & Al Refai, Hisham, 2019. "Political tensions, stock market dependence and volatility spillover: Evidence from the recent intra-GCC crises," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    7. Shi, Yujie & Wang, Liming & Ke, Jian, 2021. "Does the US-China trade war affect co-movements between US and Chinese stock markets?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    8. Karkowska, Renata & Urjasz, Szczepan, 2023. "How does the Russian-Ukrainian war change connectedness and hedging opportunities? Comparison between dirty and clean energy markets versus global stock indices," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    9. Patrick McGlenchy & Paul Kofman, 2004. "Structurally Sound Dynamic Index Futures Hedging," Econometric Society 2004 Australasian Meetings 80, Econometric Society.
    10. Khalfaoui, Rabeh & Mefteh-Wali, Salma & Viviani, Jean-Laurent & Ben Jabeur, Sami & Abedin, Mohammad Zoynul & Lucey, Brian M., 2022. "How do climate risk and clean energy spillovers, and uncertainty affect U.S. stock markets?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    11. El Ghoul, Sadok & Fu, Zhengwei & Guedhami, Omrane & Kim, Yongwon, 2024. "Do insiders profit from public environmental information? Evidence from insider trading," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    12. Mimouni, Karim & Charfeddine, Lanouar & Al-Azzam, Moh'd, 2016. "Do oil producing countries offer international diversification benefits? Evidence from GCC countries," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 263-280.
    13. Timár, Barnabás, 2023. "A klímavédelmi események hatása a köztudatra és a tőkepiacra. Empirikus vizsgálat Google-trends- és ETF-adatokon [The impact of climate events on public perception and capital markets. An empirical," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 713-745.
    14. Ji, Qiang & Bouri, Elie & Gupta, Rangan & Roubaud, David, 2018. "Network causality structures among Bitcoin and other financial assets: A directed acyclic graph approach," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 203-213.
    15. Hwang, Eugene & Min, Hong-Ghi & Kim, Bong-Han & Kim, Hyeongwoo, 2013. "Determinants of stock market comovements among US and emerging economies during the US financial crisis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 338-348.
    16. Yahya, Muhammad & Kanjilal, Kakali & Dutta, Anupam & Uddin, Gazi Salah & Ghosh, Sajal, 2021. "Can clean energy stock price rule oil price? New evidences from a regime-switching model at first and second moments," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    17. Wu, Baohui & Zhu, Pingheng & Yin, Hua & Wen, Fenghua, 2023. "The risk spillover of high carbon enterprises in China: Evidence from the stock market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    18. Essahbi Essaadi & Jamel Jouini & Wajih Khallouli, 2009. "The Asian Crisis Contagion: A Dynamic Correlation Approach Analysis," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 56(2), pages 241-260, June.
    19. M. Karanasos & S. Yfanti & A. Christopoulos, 2021. "The long memory HEAVY process: modeling and forecasting financial volatility," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 306(1), pages 111-130, November.
    20. Jouini, Jamel, 2015. "New empirical evidence from assessing financial market integration, with application to Saudi Arabia," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 198-211.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Energy ETF; Renewable energy; Portfolio optimization; Green finance; Fossil fuels;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C58 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Financial Econometrics
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G41 - Financial Economics - - Behavioral Finance - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making in Financial Markets
    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • Q42 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Alternative Energy Sources

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:131:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324000409. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.