IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v308y2023i3p1160-1175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

0-1 mathematical programming models for flexible process planning

Author

Listed:
  • Luo, Kaiping
  • Shen, Guangya
  • Li, Liheng
  • Sun, Jianfei

Abstract

Flexible Process Planning (FPP) is one of the key intelligent manufacturing techniques. The FPP problem is exactly and concisely formulated using 0-1 mathematical programming. Compared with the existing models, the new formulation simultaneously considers alternative operation selection and sequencing and operational method assignment under two optimization criteria. The new formulation does not need to plot the common AND/OR-network that often depicts partial possible processing routes. Distinctively, the important operational precedence constraint is beforehand transformed into the possible successor set of each operation and the possible immediate successor set. Three methods are creatively proposed to prohibit from generating a cycle in sequencing. The complicated criteria involving the machine, tool and setup changeover identification are linearly expressed. The experimental results indicate that the proposed 0-1 linear programming models are able to quickly obtain the optimal solution of the small-scale problems and stably find a satisfactory solution of the large-scale problems within acceptable time. Compared with the existing mathematical programming models for process planning, the proposed linear models have lower complexity and better performance in solving benchmark instances. In two groups of comparative experiments, the number of constraints of the proposed linear models dramatically reduces by 99.6% and 70%, respectively. Moreover, all benchmark instances are exactly solved by the Cplex solver using the proposed linear models within one hour.

Suggested Citation

  • Luo, Kaiping & Shen, Guangya & Li, Liheng & Sun, Jianfei, 2023. "0-1 mathematical programming models for flexible process planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(3), pages 1160-1175.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:308:y:2023:i:3:p:1160-1175
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2022.12.030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221722009948
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.12.030?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Felix Happach, 2021. "Makespan minimization with OR-precedence constraints," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 319-328, June.
    2. Yuliang Su & Xuening Chu & Dongping Chen & Xiwu Sun, 2018. "A genetic algorithm for operation sequencing in CAPP using edge selection based encoding strategy," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 313-332, February.
    3. G. Dantzig & R. Fulkerson & S. Johnson, 1954. "Solution of a Large-Scale Traveling-Salesman Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(4), pages 393-410, November.
    4. Bektaş, Tolga & Gouveia, Luis, 2014. "Requiem for the Miller–Tucker–Zemlin subtour elimination constraints?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(3), pages 820-832.
    5. Anupma Yadav & S.C. Jayswal, 2018. "Modelling of flexible manufacturing system: a review," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(7), pages 2464-2487, April.
    6. Kaiping Luo, 2022. "A sequence learning harmony search algorithm for the flexible process planning problem," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(10), pages 3182-3200, May.
    7. Zhang, An & Qi, Xiangtong & Li, Guanhua, 2020. "Machine scheduling with soft precedence constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 491-505.
    8. D. Prot & O. Bellenguez-Morineau, 2018. "A survey on how the structure of precedence constraints may change the complexity class of scheduling problems," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 3-16, February.
    9. Jianping Dou & Jun Li & Chun Su, 2018. "A discrete particle swarm optimisation for operation sequencing in CAPP," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(11), pages 3795-3814, June.
    10. Qihao Liu & Xinyu Li & Liang Gao, 2021. "Mathematical modeling and a hybrid evolutionary algorithm for process planning," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 781-797, March.
    11. Agoston E. Eiben & Jim Smith, 2015. "From evolutionary computation to the evolution of things," Nature, Nature, vol. 521(7553), pages 476-482, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rahma Lahyani & Leandro C. Coelho & Jacques Renaud, 2018. "Alternative formulations and improved bounds for the multi-depot fleet size and mix vehicle routing problem," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 40(1), pages 125-157, January.
    2. Chitsaz, Masoud & Cordeau, Jean-François & Jans, Raf, 2020. "A branch-and-cut algorithm for an assembly routing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(3), pages 896-910.
    3. Mina Roohnavazfar & Seyed Hamid Reza Pasandideh, 2022. "Decomposition algorithm for the multi-trip single vehicle routing problem with AND-type precedence constraints," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 4253-4285, September.
    4. Duygu Pamukcu & Burcu Balcik, 2020. "A multi-cover routing problem for planning rapid needs assessment under different information-sharing settings," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 42(1), pages 1-42, March.
    5. Balma, Ali & Salem, Safa Ben & Mrad, Mehdi & Ladhari, Talel, 2018. "Strong multi-commodity flow formulations for the asymmetric traveling salesman problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(1), pages 72-79.
    6. Oscar Alberto Alvarez-Flores & Raúl Rivera-Blas & Luis Armando Flores-Herrera & Emmanuel Zenén Rivera-Blas & Miguel Angel Funes-Lora & Paola Andrea Niño-Suárez, 2024. "A Novel Modified Discrete Differential Evolution Algorithm to Solve the Operations Sequencing Problem in CAPP Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-20, June.
    7. Abdullah Falih & Ahmed Z. M. Shammari, 2020. "Hybrid constrained permutation algorithm and genetic algorithm for process planning problem," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(5), pages 1079-1099, June.
    8. Ghazale Kordi & Parsa Hasanzadeh-Moghimi & Mohammad Mahdi Paydar & Ebrahim Asadi-Gangraj, 2023. "A multi-objective location-routing model for dental waste considering environmental factors," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 328(1), pages 755-792, September.
    9. Rostami, Borzou & Malucelli, Federico & Belotti, Pietro & Gualandi, Stefano, 2016. "Lower bounding procedure for the asymmetric quadratic traveling salesman problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(3), pages 584-592.
    10. Neves-Moreira, Fábio & Almada-Lobo, Bernardo & Guimarães, Luís & Amorim, Pedro, 2022. "The multi-product inventory-routing problem with pickups and deliveries: Mitigating fluctuating demand via rolling horizon heuristics," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    11. Furini, Fabio & Persiani, Carlo Alfredo & Toth, Paolo, 2016. "The Time Dependent Traveling Salesman Planning Problem in Controlled Airspace," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 38-55.
    12. Almoustafa, Samira & Hanafi, Said & Mladenović, Nenad, 2013. "New exact method for large asymmetric distance-constrained vehicle routing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(3), pages 386-394.
    13. Tang, Lixin & Liu, Jiyin & Rong, Aiying & Yang, Zihou, 2000. "A multiple traveling salesman problem model for hot rolling scheduling in Shanghai Baoshan Iron & Steel Complex," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 267-282, July.
    14. Og[breve]uz, Ceyda & Sibel Salman, F. & Bilgintürk YalçIn, Zehra, 2010. "Order acceptance and scheduling decisions in make-to-order systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 200-211, May.
    15. Santos, Lui­s & Coutinho-Rodrigues, João & Current, John R., 2008. "Implementing a multi-vehicle multi-route spatial decision support system for efficient trash collection in Portugal," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(6), pages 922-934, July.
    16. Anja Fischer & Frank Fischer, 2015. "An extended approach for lifting clique tree inequalities," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 489-519, October.
    17. Martinhon, Carlos & Lucena, Abilio & Maculan, Nelson, 2004. "Stronger K-tree relaxations for the vehicle routing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(1), pages 56-71, October.
    18. de Meijer, Frank, 2023. "Integrality and cutting planes in semidefinite programming approaches for combinatorial optimization," Other publications TiSEM b1f1088c-95fe-4b8a-9e15-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    19. Sven Mallach, 2021. "Inductive linearization for binary quadratic programs with linear constraints," 4OR, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 549-570, December.
    20. Raeesi, Ramin & Sahebjamnia, Navid & Mansouri, S. Afshin, 2023. "The synergistic effect of operational research and big data analytics in greening container terminal operations: A review and future directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(3), pages 943-973.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:308:y:2023:i:3:p:1160-1175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.