IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v305y2023i3p1079-1086.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating preferences within multiobjective flexible job shop scheduling

Author

Listed:
  • Bezoui, Madani
  • Olteanu, Alexandru-Liviu
  • Sevaux, Marc

Abstract

When faced with a multiobjective optimization problem, it is necessary to consider the decision-maker preferences in order to propose the best compromise solution. We consider the multiobjective flexible job shop scheduling problem and a decision-maker that is best represented using a non-compensatory reference level-based preference model. We show how integrating this model into a multiobjective genetic algorithm allows to obtain solutions that surpass more aspiration levels when compared to classical multiobjective optimization approaches. Furthermore, these solutions are found faster and in greater numbers which facilitates their integration within the workshop.

Suggested Citation

  • Bezoui, Madani & Olteanu, Alexandru-Liviu & Sevaux, Marc, 2023. "Integrating preferences within multiobjective flexible job shop scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(3), pages 1079-1086.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:305:y:2023:i:3:p:1079-1086
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2022.07.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221722005550
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.07.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. De Keyser, Wim & Peeters, Peter, 1996. "A note on the use of PROMETHEE multicriteria methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(3), pages 457-461, March.
    2. Rolland, Antoine, 2013. "Reference-based preferences aggregation procedures in multi-criteria decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(3), pages 479-486.
    3. Alper Türkyılmaz & Özlem Şenvar & İrem Ünal & Serol Bulkan, 2020. "A research survey: heuristic approaches for solving multi objective flexible job shop problems," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(8), pages 1949-1983, December.
    4. Alexandru-Liviu Olteanu & Khaled Belahcene & Vincent Mousseau & Wassila Ouerdane & Antoine Rolland & Jun Zheng, 2022. "Preference elicitation for a ranking method based on multiple reference profiles," 4OR, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 63-84, March.
    5. Butler, John & Jia, Jianmin & Dyer, James, 1997. "Simulation techniques for the sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria decision models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(3), pages 531-546, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dauzère-Pérès, Stéphane & Ding, Junwen & Shen, Liji & Tamssaouet, Karim, 2024. "The flexible job shop scheduling problem: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(2), pages 409-432.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arwa Khannoussi & Alexandru-Liviu Olteanu & Patrick Meyer & Nawal Benabbou, 2024. "A regret-based query selection strategy for the incremental elicitation of the criteria weights in an SRMP model," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Arwa Khannoussi & Alexandru-Liviu Olteanu & Christophe Labreuche & Patrick Meyer, 2022. "Simple ranking method using reference profiles: incremental elicitation of the preference parameters," 4OR, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 499-530, September.
    3. Alexandru-Liviu Olteanu & Khaled Belahcene & Vincent Mousseau & Wassila Ouerdane & Antoine Rolland & Jun Zheng, 2022. "Preference elicitation for a ranking method based on multiple reference profiles," 4OR, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 63-84, March.
    4. Doumpos, M. & Marinakis, Y. & Marinaki, M. & Zopounidis, C., 2009. "An evolutionary approach to construction of outranking models for multicriteria classification: The case of the ELECTRE TRI method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(2), pages 496-505, December.
    5. Roszkowska, Ewa & Wachowicz, Tomasz, 2015. "Application of fuzzy TOPSIS to scoring the negotiation offers in ill-structured negotiation problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(3), pages 920-932.
    6. Stephen P. Chambal & Jeffery D. Weir & Yucel R. Kahraman & Alex J. Gutman, 2011. "A Practical Procedure for Customizable One-Way Sensitivity Analysis in Additive Value Models," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 8(4), pages 303-321, December.
    7. Pegdwendé Minoungou & Vincent Mousseau & Wassila Ouerdane & Paolo Scotton, 2023. "A MIP-based approach to learn MR-Sort models with single-peaked preferences," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 795-817, June.
    8. Shun Jia & Yang Yang & Shuyu Li & Shang Wang & Anbang Li & Wei Cai & Yang Liu & Jian Hao & Luoke Hu, 2024. "The Green Flexible Job-Shop Scheduling Problem Considering Cost, Carbon Emissions, and Customer Satisfaction under Time-of-Use Electricity Pricing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-22, March.
    9. Yael Grushka-Cockayne & Bert De Reyck & Zeger Degraeve, 2008. "An Integrated Decision-Making Approach for Improving European Air Traffic Management," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(8), pages 1395-1409, August.
    10. Patelli, Edoardo & Feng, Geng & Coolen, Frank P.A. & Coolen-Maturi, Tahani, 2017. "Simulation methods for system reliability using the survival signature," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 327-337.
    11. Valentin Bertsch & Wolf Fichtner, 2016. "A participatory multi-criteria approach for power generation and transmission planning," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 245(1), pages 177-207, October.
    12. Luis V. Montiel & J. Eric Bickel, 2014. "A Generalized Sampling Approach for Multilinear Utility Functions Given Partial Preference Information," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 147-170, September.
    13. Luis C. Dias & Carolina Passeira & João Malça & Fausto Freire, 2022. "Integrating life-cycle assessment and multi-criteria decision analysis to compare alternative biodiesel chains," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(2), pages 1359-1374, May.
    14. Alessio Ishizaka & Philippe Nemery, 2013. "A Multi-Criteria Group Decision Framework for Partner Grouping When Sharing Facilities," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 773-799, July.
    15. Hernandez-Perdomo, Elvis A. & Mun, Johnathan & Rocco S., Claudio M., 2017. "Active management in state-owned energy companies: Integrating a real options approach into multicriteria analysis to make companies sustainable," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 487-502.
    16. Ichiro Nishizaki & Hideki Katagiri & Tomohiro Hayashida, 2010. "Sensitivity analysis incorporating fuzzy evaluation for scaling constants of multiattribute utility functions," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 18(3), pages 383-396, September.
    17. Wulf, David & Bertsch, Valentin, 2016. "A natural language generation approach to support understanding and traceability of multi-dimensional preferential sensitivity analysis in multi-criteria decision making," MPRA Paper 75025, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Durbach, Ian N. & Stewart, Theodor J., 2012. "A comparison of simplified value function approaches for treating uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 456-464.
    19. Scholz, Michael & Dorner, Verena & Schryen, Guido & Benlian, Alexander, 2017. "A configuration-based recommender system for supporting e-commerce decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(1), pages 205-215.
    20. Zeynep Ceylan & Hakan Tozan & Serol Bulkan, 2021. "A coordinated scheduling problem for the supply chain in a flexible job shop machine environment," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 875-900, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:305:y:2023:i:3:p:1079-1086. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.