IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v284y2020i2p743-761.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing temporary work and overtime in the Time Cost Quality Trade-off Problem

Author

Listed:
  • Jeunet, Jully
  • Bou Orm, Mayassa

Abstract

In spite of its significant contribution to project success, quality has been scarcely addressed in the literature on deterministic project scheduling problems. Although it is recognized that higher qualities are associated with longer processing times, no relationship between quality and resource consumption has been analytically derived to support this statement. As manufacturing projects can be accelerated using additional manpower such as overtime and temporary workers, we derive an analytical relationship between quality and manpower since overtime and overmanning negate quality. We also take into account productivity losses due to overmanning. Contrary to most previous contributions that focus on the project overall quality as an aggregation of quality levels attained at the individual activities, we impose each activity to reach a minimum quality threshold, which is consistent with project management practices. Consequently, we develop a mixed integer linear programming (MILP) to optimize temporary work and overtime so as to accelerate a project with quality and productivity considerations. The objective is to simultaneously determine for each activity the number of permanent, temporary and overtime workers over the processing periods in order to minimize the makespan, the total cost and the overall quality losses subject to individual quality constraints, precedence relationships, nonpreemption and availability of resources. Our approach is successfully applied on numerous instances based on a real project of a high speed locomotive as well as on other projects taken from the literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeunet, Jully & Bou Orm, Mayassa, 2020. "Optimizing temporary work and overtime in the Time Cost Quality Trade-off Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(2), pages 743-761.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:284:y:2020:i:2:p:743-761
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.01.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221720300345
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.01.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Pencavel, 2013. "The Productivity Of Working Hours," Discussion Papers 13-006, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
    2. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2010. "A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 1-14, November.
    3. Babu, A. J. G. & Suresh, Nalina, 1996. "Project management with time, cost, and quality considerations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 320-327, January.
    4. Naber, Anulark & Kolisch, Rainer, 2014. "MIP models for resource-constrained project scheduling with flexible resource profiles," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(2), pages 335-348.
    5. Kolisch, Rainer & Sprecher, Arno, 1996. "PSPLIB - a project scheduling problem library," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 396, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    6. Fündeling, C.-U. & Trautmann, N., 2010. "A priority-rule method for project scheduling with work-content constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(3), pages 568-574, June.
    7. Russell, Arya & Taghipour, Sharareh, 2019. "Multi-objective optimization of complex scheduling problems in low-volume low-variety production systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 1-16.
    8. Weglarz, Jan & Józefowska, Joanna & Mika, Marek & Waligóra, Grzegorz, 2011. "Project scheduling with finite or infinite number of activity processing modes - A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 208(3), pages 177-205, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amoozad Mahdiraji, Hannan & Sedigh, Maryam & Razavi Hajiagha, Seyed Hossein & Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo & Jafari-Sadeghi, Vahid & Dana, Leo-Paul, 2021. "A novel time, cost, quality and risk tradeoff model with a knowledge-based hesitant fuzzy information: An R&D project application," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    2. Seyed Hossein Razavi Hajiagha & Hannan Amoozad Mahdiraji & Maryam Behnam & Boshra Nekoughadirli & Rohit Joshi, 2022. "A scenario-based robust time–cost tradeoff model to handle the effect of COVID-19 on supply chains project management," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 357-377, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mick Van Den Eeckhout & Broos Maenhout & Mario Vanhoucke, 2020. "Mode generation rules to define activity flexibility for the integrated project staffing problem with discrete time/resource trade-offs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 292(1), pages 133-160, September.
    2. Roland Braune & Karl F. Doerner, 2017. "Real-world flexible resource profile scheduling with multiple criteria: learning scalarization functions for MIP and heuristic approaches," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(8), pages 952-972, August.
    3. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2022. "An updated survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(1), pages 1-14.
    4. Tritschler, Martin & Naber, Anulark & Kolisch, Rainer, 2017. "A hybrid metaheuristic for resource-constrained project scheduling with flexible resource profiles," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(1), pages 262-273.
    5. Kellenbrink, Carolin & Helber, Stefan, 2015. "Scheduling resource-constrained projects with a flexible project structure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(2), pages 379-391.
    6. Zhengwen He & Nengmin Wang & Pengxiang Li, 2014. "Simulated annealing for financing cost distribution based project payment scheduling from a joint perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 213(1), pages 203-220, February.
    7. Wendi Tian & Erik Demeulemeester, 2014. "Railway scheduling reduces the expected project makespan over roadrunner scheduling in a multi-mode project scheduling environment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 213(1), pages 271-291, February.
    8. Beşikci, Umut & Bilge, Ümit & Ulusoy, Gündüz, 2015. "Multi-mode resource constrained multi-project scheduling and resource portfolio problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(1), pages 22-31.
    9. Naber, Anulark & Kolisch, Rainer, 2014. "MIP models for resource-constrained project scheduling with flexible resource profiles," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(2), pages 335-348.
    10. He, Zhengwen & Liu, Renjing & Jia, Tao, 2012. "Metaheuristics for multi-mode capital-constrained project payment scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(3), pages 605-613.
    11. Messelis, Tommy & De Causmaecker, Patrick, 2014. "An automatic algorithm selection approach for the multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(3), pages 511-528.
    12. Brachmann, Robert & Kolisch, Rainer, 2021. "The impact of flexibility on engineer-to-order production planning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    13. Estévez-Fernández, Arantza, 2012. "A game theoretical approach to sharing penalties and rewards in projects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(3), pages 647-657.
    14. Xiong, Jian & Leus, Roel & Yang, Zhenyu & Abbass, Hussein A., 2016. "Evolutionary multi-objective resource allocation and scheduling in the Chinese navigation satellite system project," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(2), pages 662-675.
    15. Luis F. Machado-Domínguez & Carlos D. Paternina-Arboleda & Jorge I. Vélez & Agustin Barrios-Sarmiento, 2021. "A memetic algorithm to address the multi-node resource-constrained project scheduling problem," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 413-429, August.
    16. Paraskevopoulos, Dimitris C. & Laporte, Gilbert & Repoussis, Panagiotis P. & Tarantilis, Christos D., 2017. "Resource constrained routing and scheduling: Review and research prospects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(3), pages 737-754.
    17. Grzegorz Waligóra, 2016. "Comparative Analysis of Some Metaheuristics for Discrete-Continuous Project Scheduling with Activities of Identical Processing Rates," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 33(03), pages 1-32, June.
    18. Bahram Alidaee & Haibo Wang & R. Bryan Kethley & Frank Landram, 2019. "A unified view of parallel machine scheduling with interdependent processing rates," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 499-515, October.
    19. Ben Issa, Samer & Patterson, Raymond A. & Tu, Yiliu, 2021. "Solving resource-constrained multi-project environment under different activity assumptions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    20. Luise-Sophie Hoffmann & Carolin Kellenbrink & Stefan Helber, 2020. "Simultaneous structuring and scheduling of multiple projects with flexible project structures," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 90(5), pages 679-711, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:284:y:2020:i:2:p:743-761. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.