IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v259y2017i1p236-250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An efficient solution method to design the cost-minimizing platform portfolio

Author

Listed:
  • Van den Broeke, Maud
  • Boute, Robert
  • Cardoen, Brecht
  • Samii, Behzad

Abstract

To offer a wide product variety to customers in a cost-efficient way, companies have introduced platforms, defined as a base from which different products can be derived. We consider a product portfolio, consisting of a set of end products, where each product has a set of attributes (features), which can have different levels requested by the customers. We present a model to support companies in designing the cost-minimizing platform portfolio, consisting of a set of platforms, from which these products can be derived. Each platform has a set of technical design parameters, which can have different levels. The required parameter levels in the platform’s design depend on the attribute needs of the products derived from the platform. Our model gives guidance to what extent the platforms should be under-designed, over-designed or the same with regard to the products (and its attribute levels) derived from them. The model quantifies the impact of these platform portfolio decisions on the relevant operational costs. Given the complexity of this problem for large-scale instances, we develop two fathoming rules to improve computational efficiency. These fathoming rules can be used in different solution algorithms. We illustrate their applicability in a branch-and-bound, simulated annealing and genetic algorithm. We demonstrate the value of our model and solution method with a practical case of a high-tech screen manufacturing company, that wants to design the cost-minimizing platform portfolio from which their product portfolio can be derived.

Suggested Citation

  • Van den Broeke, Maud & Boute, Robert & Cardoen, Brecht & Samii, Behzad, 2017. "An efficient solution method to design the cost-minimizing platform portfolio," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(1), pages 236-250.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:259:y:2017:i:1:p:236-250
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.10.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221716308165
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.10.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. V. Krishnan & Saurabh Gupta, 2001. "Appropriateness and Impact of Platform-Based Product Development," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(1), pages 52-68, January.
    2. Yang, Dong & Jiao, Jianxin (Roger) & Ji, Yangjian & Du, Gang & Helo, Petri & Valente, Anna, 2015. "Joint optimization for coordinated configuration of product families and supply chains by a leader-follower Stackelberg game," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(1), pages 263-280.
    3. Albritton, M. David & McMullen, Patrick R., 2007. "Optimal product design using a colony of virtual ants," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(1), pages 498-520, January.
    4. Maud Van den Broeke & Robert Boute & Behzad Samii, 2015. "Evaluation of product-platform decisions based on total supply chain costs," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(18), pages 5545-5563, September.
    5. Agard, Bruno & Penz, Bernard, 2009. "A simulated annealing method based on a clustering approach to determine bills of materials for a large product family," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 389-401, February.
    6. P. V. (Sundar) Balakrishnan & Varghese S. Jacob, 1996. "Genetic Algorithms for Product Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(8), pages 1105-1117, August.
    7. Mohit Goswami & Saurabh Pratap & S.K. Kumar, 2016. "An integrated Bayesian-Game theoretic approach for product portfolio planning of a multi-attributed product in a duopolistic market," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(23), pages 6997-7013, December.
    8. Du, Gang & Jiao, Roger J. & Chen, Mo, 2014. "Joint optimization of product family configuration and scaling design by Stackelberg game," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(2), pages 330-341.
    9. Nepal, Bimal & Monplaisir, Leslie & Famuyiwa, Oluwafemi, 2012. "Matching product architecture with supply chain design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(2), pages 312-325.
    10. Crama, Y. & Schyns, M., 2003. "Simulated annealing for complex portfolio selection problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(3), pages 546-571, November.
    11. Kohli, Rajeev & Krishnamurti, Ramesh, 1989. "Optimal product design using conjoint analysis: Computational complexity and algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 186-195, May.
    12. L. Ingber, 1993. "Simulated annealing: Practice versus theory," Lester Ingber Papers 93sa, Lester Ingber.
    13. J. Clausen & M. Perregaard, 1999. "On the best search strategy in parallel branch‐and‐bound:Best‐First Search versus Lazy Depth‐First Search," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 90(0), pages 1-17, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Van den Broeke, Maud M. & Boute, Robert N. & Van Mieghem, Jan A., 2018. "Platform flexibility strategies: R&D investment versus production customization tradeoff," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(2), pages 475-486.
    2. Helene Krieg & Tobias Seidel & Jan Schwientek & Karl-Heinz Küfer, 2022. "Solving continuous set covering problems by means of semi-infinite optimization," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 96(1), pages 39-82, August.
    3. Robert N. Boute & Maud M. Van den Broeke & Kristof A. Deneire, 2017. "Barco Implements Platform-Based Product Development in Its Healthcare Division," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 48(01), pages 35-44, February.
    4. Bersch, Christopher V. & Akkerman, Renzo & Kolisch, Rainer, 2021. "Strategic planning of new product introductions: Integrated planning of products and modules in the automotive industry," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiong, Yixuan & Du, Gang & Jiao, Roger J., 2018. "Modular product platforming with supply chain postponement decisions by leader-follower interactive optimization," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 272-286.
    2. Pantourakis, Michail & Tsafarakis, Stelios & Zervoudakis, Konstantinos & Altsitsiadis, Efthymios & Andronikidis, Andreas & Ntamadaki, Vasiliki, 2022. "Clonal selection algorithms for optimal product line design: A comparative study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(2), pages 585-595.
    3. Robert N. Boute & Maud M. Van den Broeke & Kristof A. Deneire, 2017. "Barco Implements Platform-Based Product Development in Its Healthcare Division," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 48(01), pages 35-44, February.
    4. Eder Oliveira Abensur, 2007. "Genetic Algorithms for Development of New Financial Products," Brazilian Review of Finance, Brazilian Society of Finance, vol. 5(1), pages 59-77.
    5. Daria Dzyabura & Srikanth Jagabathula, 2018. "Offline Assortment Optimization in the Presence of an Online Channel," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(6), pages 2767-2786, June.
    6. Tarasewich, Peter & McMullen, Patrick R., 2001. "A pruning heuristic for use with multisource product design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 58-73, January.
    7. Evan Rash & Karl Kempf, 2012. "Product Line Design and Scheduling at Intel," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 42(5), pages 425-436, October.
    8. Baud-Lavigne, Bertrand & Agard, Bruno & Penz, Bernard, 2016. "Simultaneous product family and supply chain design: An optimization approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 111-118.
    9. Van den Broeke, Maud M. & Boute, Robert N. & Van Mieghem, Jan A., 2018. "Platform flexibility strategies: R&D investment versus production customization tradeoff," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(2), pages 475-486.
    10. Ma, Yujie & Du, Gang & Jiao, Roger J., 2020. "Optimal crowdsourcing contracting for reconfigurable process planning in open manufacturing: A bilevel coordinated optimization approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    11. Tan Wang & Genaro Gutierrez, 2022. "Robust Product Line Design by Protecting the Downside While Minding the Upside," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(1), pages 194-217, January.
    12. Mohit Goswami & Yash Daultani & M.K. Tiwari, 2017. "An integrated framework for product line design for modular products: product attribute and functionality-driven perspective," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(13), pages 3862-3885, July.
    13. Fish, Kelly E. & Johnson, John D. & Dorsey, Robert E. & Blodgett, Jeffery G., 2004. "Using an artificial neural network trained with a genetic algorithm to model brand share," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 79-85, January.
    14. Albritton, M. David & McMullen, Patrick R., 2007. "Optimal product design using a colony of virtual ants," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(1), pages 498-520, January.
    15. Tsafarakis, Stelios & Marinakis, Yannis & Matsatsinis, Nikolaos, 2011. "Particle swarm optimization for optimal product line design," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 13-22.
    16. Nair, Suresh K. & Tarasewich, Peter, 2003. "A model and solution method for multi-period sales promotion design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(3), pages 672-687, November.
    17. G. E. Fruchter & A. Fligler & R. S. Winer, 2006. "Optimal Product Line Design: Genetic Algorithm Approach to Mitigate Cannibalization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 227-244, November.
    18. Jeffrey D. Camm & James J. Cochran & David J. Curry & Sriram Kannan, 2006. "Conjoint Optimization: An Exact Branch-and-Bound Algorithm for the Share-of-Choice Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(3), pages 435-447, March.
    19. Winfried J. Steiner & Harald Hruschka, 2002. "Produktliniengestaltung mit Genetischen Algorithmen," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 54(7), pages 575-601, November.
    20. Stelios Tsafarakis, 2016. "Redesigning product lines in a period of economic crisis: a hybrid simulated annealing algorithm with crossover," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 247(2), pages 617-633, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:259:y:2017:i:1:p:236-250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.