IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v243y2015i2p454-464.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Refined ranking relations for selection of solutions in multi objective metaheuristics

Author

Listed:
  • Moritz, Ruby L.V.
  • Reich, Enrico
  • Schwarz, Maik
  • Bernt, Matthias
  • Middendorf, Martin

Abstract

Two methods for ranking of solutions of multi objective optimization problems are proposed in this paper. The methods can be used, e.g. by metaheuristics to select good solutions from a set of non dominated solutions. They are suitable for population based metaheuristics to limit the size of the population. It is shown theoretically that the ranking methods possess some interesting properties for such applications. In particular, it is shown that both methods form a total preorder and are both refinements of the Pareto dominance relation. An experimental investigation for a multi objective flow shop problem shows that the use of the new ranking methods in a Population-based Ant Colony Optimization algorithm and in a genetic algorithm leads to good results when compared to other methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Moritz, Ruby L.V. & Reich, Enrico & Schwarz, Maik & Bernt, Matthias & Middendorf, Martin, 2015. "Refined ranking relations for selection of solutions in multi objective metaheuristics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(2), pages 454-464.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:243:y:2015:i:2:p:454-464
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.10.044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221714008662
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.10.044?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Heller, 1960. "Some Numerical Experiments for an M × J Flow Shop and its Decision-Theoretical Aspects," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 178-184, April.
    2. Taillard, E., 1993. "Benchmarks for basic scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 278-285, January.
    3. M. R. Garey & D. S. Johnson & Ravi Sethi, 1976. "The Complexity of Flowshop and Jobshop Scheduling," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 1(2), pages 117-129, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ding, Jiankun & Han, Deqiang & Yang, Yi, 2018. "Iterative ranking aggregation using quality improvement of subgroup ranking," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(2), pages 596-612.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vallada, Eva & Ruiz, Rubén & Framinan, Jose M., 2015. "New hard benchmark for flowshop scheduling problems minimising makespan," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(3), pages 666-677.
    2. Brammer, Janis & Lutz, Bernhard & Neumann, Dirk, 2022. "Permutation flow shop scheduling with multiple lines and demand plans using reinforcement learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 75-86.
    3. Tseng, Lin-Yu & Lin, Ya-Tai, 2009. "A hybrid genetic local search algorithm for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(1), pages 84-92, October.
    4. Gerardo Minella & Rubén Ruiz & Michele Ciavotta, 2008. "A Review and Evaluation of Multiobjective Algorithms for the Flowshop Scheduling Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 451-471, August.
    5. Jean-Paul Watson & Laura Barbulescu & L. Darrell Whitley & Adele E. Howe, 2002. "Contrasting Structured and Random Permutation Flow-Shop Scheduling Problems: Search-Space Topology and Algorithm Performance," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 98-123, May.
    6. Li, Xiaoping & Wang, Qian & Wu, Cheng, 2009. "Efficient composite heuristics for total flowtime minimization in permutation flow shops," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 155-164, February.
    7. Cheng, Jinliang & Steiner, George & Stephenson, Paul, 2001. "A computational study with a new algorithm for the three-machine permutation flow-shop problem with release times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(3), pages 559-575, May.
    8. Monaci, Marta & Agasucci, Valerio & Grani, Giorgio, 2024. "An actor-critic algorithm with policy gradients to solve the job shop scheduling problem using deep double recurrent agents," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(3), pages 910-926.
    9. Matthias Bultmann & Sigrid Knust & Stefan Waldherr, 2018. "Flow shop scheduling with flexible processing times," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 40(3), pages 809-829, July.
    10. Li, Wei & Nault, Barrie R. & Ye, Honghan, 2019. "Trade-off balancing in scheduling for flow shop production and perioperative processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 817-830.
    11. Fatima Benbouzid-Si Tayeb & Karima Benatchba & Abd-Essalam Messiaid, 2018. "Game theory-based integration of scheduling with flexible and periodic maintenance planning in the permutation flowshop sequencing problem," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 221-255, April.
    12. Agarwal, Anurag & Colak, Selcuk & Eryarsoy, Enes, 2006. "Improvement heuristic for the flow-shop scheduling problem: An adaptive-learning approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(3), pages 801-815, March.
    13. J. Christopher Beck & T. K. Feng & Jean-Paul Watson, 2011. "Combining Constraint Programming and Local Search for Job-Shop Scheduling," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 1-14, February.
    14. Ruiz, Rubén & Maroto, Concepciøn & Alcaraz, Javier, 2006. "Two new robust genetic algorithms for the flowshop scheduling problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 461-476, October.
    15. J M Framinan & J N D Gupta & R Leisten, 2004. "A review and classification of heuristics for permutation flow-shop scheduling with makespan objective," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(12), pages 1243-1255, December.
    16. Framinan, Jose M. & Leisten, Rainer & Ruiz-Usano, Rafael, 2002. "Efficient heuristics for flowshop sequencing with the objectives of makespan and flowtime minimisation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(3), pages 559-569, September.
    17. M Haouari & T Ladhari, 2003. "A branch-and-bound-based local search method for the flow shop problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(10), pages 1076-1084, October.
    18. Jianhui Mou & Xinyu Li & Liang Gao & Wenchao Yi, 2018. "An effective L-MONG algorithm for solving multi-objective flow-shop inverse scheduling problems," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 789-807, April.
    19. Fernandez-Viagas, Victor & Ruiz, Rubén & Framinan, Jose M., 2017. "A new vision of approximate methods for the permutation flowshop to minimise makespan: State-of-the-art and computational evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 707-721.
    20. Yannik Zeiträg & José Rui Figueira, 2023. "Automatically evolving preference-based dispatching rules for multi-objective job shop scheduling," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 289-314, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:243:y:2015:i:2:p:454-464. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.