IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v237y2014i2p498-507.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An evaluation of semidefinite programming based approaches for discrete lot-sizing problems

Author

Listed:
  • Gicquel, C.
  • Lisser, A.
  • Minoux, M.

Abstract

The present work is intended as a first step towards applying semidefinite programming models and tools to discrete lot-sizing problems including sequence-dependent changeover costs and times. Such problems can be formulated as quadratically constrained quadratic binary programs. We investigate several semidefinite relaxations by combining known reformulation techniques recently proposed for generic quadratic binary problems with problem-specific strengthening procedures developed for lot-sizing problems. Our computational results show that the semidefinite relaxations consistently provide lower bounds of significantly improved quality as compared with those provided by the best previously published linear relaxations. In particular, the gap between the semidefinite relaxation and the optimal integer solution value can be closed for a significant proportion of the small-size instances, thus avoiding to resort to a tree search procedure. The reported computation times are significant. However improvements in SDP technology can still be expected in the future, making SDP based approaches to discrete lot-sizing more competitive.

Suggested Citation

  • Gicquel, C. & Lisser, A. & Minoux, M., 2014. "An evaluation of semidefinite programming based approaches for discrete lot-sizing problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(2), pages 498-507.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:237:y:2014:i:2:p:498-507
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.02.027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037722171400160X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.02.027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gary D. Eppen & R. Kipp Martin, 1987. "Solving Multi-Item Capacitated Lot-Sizing Problems Using Variable Redefinition," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(6), pages 832-848, December.
    2. Alexander Engau, 2012. "Recent Progress in Interior-Point Methods: Cutting-Plane Algorithms and Warm Starts," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Miguel F. Anjos & Jean B. Lasserre (ed.), Handbook on Semidefinite, Conic and Polynomial Optimization, chapter 0, pages 471-498, Springer.
    3. BELVAUX, Gaetan & WOLSEY, Laurence A., 2001. "Modelling practical lot-sizing problems as mixed-integer programs," LIDAM Reprints CORE 1516, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    4. Ferreira, Deisemara & Clark, Alistair R. & Almada-Lobo, Bernardo & Morabito, Reinaldo, 2012. "Single-stage formulations for synchronised two-stage lot sizing and scheduling in soft drink production," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(2), pages 255-265.
    5. Helmberg, C., 2002. "Semidefinite programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(3), pages 461-482, March.
    6. Harvey M. Wagner & Thomson M. Whitin, 1958. "Dynamic Version of the Economic Lot Size Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 89-96, October.
    7. Salomon, Marc & Solomon, Marius M. & Van Wassenhove, Luk N. & Dumas, Yvan & Dauzere-Peres, Stephane, 1997. "Solving the discrete lotsizing and scheduling problem with sequence dependent set-up costs and set-up times using the Travelling Salesman Problem with time windows," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(3), pages 494-513, August.
    8. Frédéric Roupin, 2004. "From Linear to Semidefinite Programming: An Algorithm to Obtain Semidefinite Relaxations for Bivalent Quadratic Problems," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 469-493, December.
    9. Gaetan Belvaux & Laurence A. Wolsey, 2001. "Modelling Practical Lot-Sizing Problems as Mixed-Integer Programs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(7), pages 993-1007, July.
    10. Fleischmann, Bernhard, 1990. "The discrete lot-sizing and scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 337-348, February.
    11. C. Helmberg & F. Rendl & R. Weismantel, 2000. "A Semidefinite Programming Approach to the Quadratic Knapsack Problem," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 197-215, June.
    12. Jans, Raf & Degraeve, Zeger, 2007. "Meta-heuristics for dynamic lot sizing: A review and comparison of solution approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 1855-1875, March.
    13. Makoto Yamashita & Katsuki Fujisawa & Mituhiro Fukuda & Kazuhiro Kobayashi & Kazuhide Nakata & Maho Nakata, 2012. "Latest Developments in the SDPA Family for Solving Large-Scale SDPs," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Miguel F. Anjos & Jean B. Lasserre (ed.), Handbook on Semidefinite, Conic and Polynomial Optimization, chapter 0, pages 687-713, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karina Copil & Martin Wörbelauer & Herbert Meyr & Horst Tempelmeier, 2017. "Simultaneous lotsizing and scheduling problems: a classification and review of models," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 39(1), pages 1-64, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jans, Raf & Degraeve, Zeger, 2007. "Meta-heuristics for dynamic lot sizing: A review and comparison of solution approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 1855-1875, March.
    2. Karina Copil & Martin Wörbelauer & Herbert Meyr & Horst Tempelmeier, 2017. "Simultaneous lotsizing and scheduling problems: a classification and review of models," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 39(1), pages 1-64, January.
    3. Raf Jans, 2009. "Solving Lot-Sizing Problems on Parallel Identical Machines Using Symmetry-Breaking Constraints," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 123-136, February.
    4. Zeger Degraeve & Raf Jans, 2007. "A New Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation and Branch-and-Price Algorithm for the Capacitated Lot-Sizing Problem with Setup Times," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(5), pages 909-920, October.
    5. Lee, Younsoo & Lee, Kyungsik, 2020. "Lot-sizing and scheduling in flat-panel display manufacturing process," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    6. Kaczmarczyk, Waldemar, 2020. "Valid inequalities for proportional lot-sizing and scheduling problem with fictitious microperiods," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 236-247.
    7. Laurence A. Wolsey, 2002. "Solving Multi-Item Lot-Sizing Problems with an MIP Solver Using Classification and Reformulation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(12), pages 1587-1602, December.
    8. Kerem Akartunalı & Ioannis Fragkos & Andrew J. Miller & Tao Wu, 2016. "Local Cuts and Two-Period Convex Hull Closures for Big-Bucket Lot-Sizing Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 766-780, November.
    9. Narayanan, Arunachalam & Robinson, Powell, 2010. "Efficient and effective heuristics for the coordinated capacitated lot-size problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(3), pages 583-592, June.
    10. Karimi, B. & Fatemi Ghomi, S. M. T. & Wilson, J. M., 2003. "The capacitated lot sizing problem: a review of models and algorithms," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 365-378, October.
    11. Kerem Akartunalı & Andrew Miller, 2012. "A computational analysis of lower bounds for big bucket production planning problems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 729-753, December.
    12. Jenny Carolina Saldana Cortés, 2011. "Programación semidefinida aplicada a problemas de cantidad económica de pedido," Documentos CEDE 8735, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    13. Helber, Stefan & Sahling, Florian, 2010. "A fix-and-optimize approach for the multi-level capacitated lot sizing problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(2), pages 247-256, February.
    14. Andrea Raiconi & Julia Pahl & Monica Gentili & Stefan Voß & Raffaele Cerulli, 2017. "Tactical Production and Lot Size Planning with Lifetime Constraints: A Comparison of Model Formulations," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 34(05), pages 1-24, October.
    15. AkartunalI, Kerem & Miller, Andrew J., 2009. "A heuristic approach for big bucket multi-level production planning problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(2), pages 396-411, March.
    16. Degraeve, Z. & Jans, R.F., 2003. "A New Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation And Branch-And-Price Algorithm For The Capacitated Lot Sizing Problem With Set Up Times," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2003-010-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    17. Yongpei Guan & Andrew J. Miller, 2008. "Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Stochastic Uncapacitated Lot-Sizing Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(5), pages 1172-1183, October.
    18. Brahimi, Nadjib & Dauzere-Peres, Stephane & Najid, Najib M. & Nordli, Atle, 2006. "Single item lot sizing problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(1), pages 1-16, January.
    19. Melega, Gislaine Mara & de Araujo, Silvio Alexandre & Jans, Raf, 2018. "Classification and literature review of integrated lot-sizing and cutting stock problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(1), pages 1-19.
    20. Atamturk, Alper & Munoz, Juan Carlos, 2002. "A Study of the Lot-Sizing Polytope," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt6zz2g0z4, University of California Transportation Center.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:237:y:2014:i:2:p:498-507. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.