IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v230y2013i3p487-494.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A linear programming approach for linear programs with probabilistic constraints

Author

Listed:
  • Reich, Daniel

Abstract

We study a class of mixed-integer programs for solving linear programs with joint probabilistic constraints from random right-hand side vectors with finite distributions. We present greedy and dual heuristic algorithms that construct and solve a sequence of linear programs. We provide optimality gaps for our heuristic solutions via the linear programming relaxation of the extended mixed-integer formulation of Luedtke et al. (2010) [13] as well as via lower bounds produced by their cutting plane method. While we demonstrate through an extensive computational study the effectiveness and scalability of our heuristics, we also prove that the theoretical worst-case solution quality for these algorithms is arbitrarily far from optimal. Our computational study compares our heuristics against both the extended mixed-integer programming formulation and the cutting plane method of Luedtke et al. (2010) [13]. Our heuristics efficiently and consistently produce solutions with small optimality gaps, while for larger instances the extended formulation becomes intractable and the optimality gaps from the cutting plane method increase to over 5%.

Suggested Citation

  • Reich, Daniel, 2013. "A linear programming approach for linear programs with probabilistic constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(3), pages 487-494.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:230:y:2013:i:3:p:487-494
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.04.049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221713003639
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.04.049?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. GÜNLÜK, Oktay & POCHET, Yves, 2001. "Mixing mixed-integer inequalities," LIDAM Reprints CORE 1504, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    2. Tanner, Matthew W. & Ntaimo, Lewis, 2010. "IIS branch-and-cut for joint chance-constrained stochastic programs and application to optimal vaccine allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 290-296, November.
    3. MILLER, Andrew J. & WOLSEY, Laurence A., 2003. "Tight formulations for some simple mixed integer programs and convex objective integer programs," LIDAM Reprints CORE 1653, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    4. B. K. Pagnoncelli & S. Ahmed & A. Shapiro, 2009. "Sample Average Approximation Method for Chance Constrained Programming: Theory and Applications," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 142(2), pages 399-416, August.
    5. B. K. Pagnoncelli & D. Reich & M. C. Campi, 2012. "Risk-Return Trade-off with the Scenario Approach in Practice: A Case Study in Portfolio Selection," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 155(2), pages 707-722, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaodi Bai & Jie Sun & Xiaojin Zheng, 2021. "An Augmented Lagrangian Decomposition Method for Chance-Constrained Optimization Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 1056-1069, July.
    2. Hu, Qing-Mi & Hu, Shaolong & Wang, Jian & Li, Xiaoping, 2021. "Stochastic single allocation hub location problems with balanced utilization of hub capacities," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 204-227.
    3. Bentaha, Mohand Lounes & Battaïa, Olga & Dolgui, Alexandre & Hu, S. Jack, 2015. "Second order conic approximation for disassembly line design with joint probabilistic constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(3), pages 957-967.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shanshan Wang & Jinlin Li & Sanjay Mehrotra, 2021. "Chance-Constrained Multiple Bin Packing Problem with an Application to Operating Room Planning," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1661-1677, October.
    2. Minjiao Zhang & Simge Küçükyavuz & Saumya Goel, 2014. "A Branch-and-Cut Method for Dynamic Decision Making Under Joint Chance Constraints," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(5), pages 1317-1333, May.
    3. Feng Qiu & Shabbir Ahmed & Santanu S. Dey & Laurence A. Wolsey, 2014. "Covering Linear Programming with Violations," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 26(3), pages 531-546, August.
    4. Michele Conforti & Gérard Cornuéjols & Giacomo Zambelli, 2013. "Extended formulations in combinatorial optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 204(1), pages 97-143, April.
    5. DI SUMMA, Marco & WOLSEY, Laurence, 2010. "Mixing sets linked by bidirected paths," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2010063, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    6. Algo Carè & Simone Garatti & Marco C. Campi, 2014. "FAST---Fast Algorithm for the Scenario Technique," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(3), pages 662-671, June.
    7. Gianpiero Canessa & Julian A. Gallego & Lewis Ntaimo & Bernardo K. Pagnoncelli, 2019. "An algorithm for binary linear chance-constrained problems using IIS," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 72(3), pages 589-608, April.
    8. Yongjia Song & James R. Luedtke & Simge Küçükyavuz, 2014. "Chance-Constrained Binary Packing Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 735-747, November.
    9. Holger Berthold & Holger Heitsch & René Henrion & Jan Schwientek, 2022. "On the algorithmic solution of optimization problems subject to probabilistic/robust (probust) constraints," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 96(1), pages 1-37, August.
    10. Weijun Xie & Shabbir Ahmed, 2020. "Bicriteria Approximation of Chance-Constrained Covering Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 516-533, March.
    11. L. Jeff Hong & Zhaolin Hu & Liwei Zhang, 2014. "Conditional Value-at-Risk Approximation to Value-at-Risk Constrained Programs: A Remedy via Monte Carlo," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 385-400, May.
    12. B. K. Pagnoncelli & D. Reich & M. C. Campi, 2012. "Risk-Return Trade-off with the Scenario Approach in Practice: A Case Study in Portfolio Selection," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 155(2), pages 707-722, November.
    13. Ming Zhao & Minjiao Zhang, 2020. "Multiechelon Lot Sizing: New Complexities and Inequalities," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 534-551, March.
    14. Yongpei Guan & Shabbir Ahmed & George L. Nemhauser, 2009. "Cutting Planes for Multistage Stochastic Integer Programs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(2), pages 287-298, April.
    15. Chardy, Matthieu & Klopfenstein, Olivier, 2012. "Handling uncertainties in vehicle routing problems through data preprocessing," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 667-683.
    16. Jitka Dupačová & Miloš Kopa, 2012. "Robustness in stochastic programs with risk constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 200(1), pages 55-74, November.
    17. Diglio, Antonio & Peiró, Juanjo & Piccolo, Carmela & Saldanha-da-Gama, Francisco, 2023. "Approximation schemes for districting problems with probabilistic constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(1), pages 233-248.
    18. Erfan Mohagheghi & Mansour Alramlawi & Aouss Gabash & Pu Li, 2018. "A Survey of Real-Time Optimal Power Flow," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-20, November.
    19. Miguel A. Lejeune & François Margot, 2016. "Solving Chance-Constrained Optimization Problems with Stochastic Quadratic Inequalities," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(4), pages 939-957, August.
    20. Patrizia Beraldi & Maria Bruni & Antonio Violi, 2012. "Capital rationing problems under uncertainty and risk," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 1375-1396, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:230:y:2013:i:3:p:487-494. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.