IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v218y2012i3p838-846.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Multi-Period Renewal equipment problem

Author

Listed:
  • Cao, Xiaokang
  • Jouglet, Antoine
  • Nace, Dritan

Abstract

This paper looks at a Multi-Period Renewal equipment problem (MPR). It is inspired by a specific real-life situation where a set of hardware items is to be managed and their replacement dates determined, given a budget over a time horizon comprising a set of periods. The particular characteristic of this problem is the possibility of carrying forward any unused budget from one period to the next, which corresponds to the multi-periodicity aspect in the model. We begin with the industrial context and deduce the corresponding knapsack model that is the subject of this paper. Links to certain variants of the knapsack problem are next examined. We provide a study of complexity of the problem, for some of its special cases, and for its continuous relaxation. In particular, it is established that its continuous relaxation and a special case can be solved in (strongly) polynomial time, that three other special cases can be solved in pseudo-polynomial time, while the problem itself is strongly NP-hard when the number of periods is unbounded. Next, two heuristics are proposed for solving the MPR problem. Experimental results and comparisons with the Martello&Toth and Dantzig heuristics, adapted to our problem, are provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Cao, Xiaokang & Jouglet, Antoine & Nace, Dritan, 2012. "A Multi-Period Renewal equipment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(3), pages 838-846.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:218:y:2012:i:3:p:838-846
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.12.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221711010885
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.12.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. George B. Dantzig, 1957. "Discrete-Variable Extremum Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 5(2), pages 266-288, April.
    2. Edward Y H Lin & Chung-Min Wu, 2004. "The multiple-choice multi-period knapsack problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(2), pages 187-197, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martello, Silvano & Pisinger, David & Toth, Paolo, 2000. "New trends in exact algorithms for the 0-1 knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(2), pages 325-332, June.
    2. B. Golany & N. Goldberg & U. Rothblum, 2015. "Allocating multiple defensive resources in a zero-sum game setting," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 225(1), pages 91-109, February.
    3. Teresa Estañ & Natividad Llorca & Ricardo Martínez & Joaquín Sánchez-Soriano, 2020. "On the difficulty of budget allocation in claims problems with indivisible items of different prices," ThE Papers 20/09, Department of Economic Theory and Economic History of the University of Granada..
    4. Teresa Estañ & Natividad Llorca & Ricardo Martínez & Joaquín Sánchez-Soriano, 2021. "On the Difficulty of Budget Allocation in Claims Problems with Indivisible Items and Prices," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 1133-1159, October.
    5. Sbihi, Abdelkader, 2010. "A cooperative local search-based algorithm for the Multiple-Scenario Max-Min Knapsack Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(2), pages 339-346, April.
    6. Yanhong Feng & Xu Yu & Gai-Ge Wang, 2019. "A Novel Monarch Butterfly Optimization with Global Position Updating Operator for Large-Scale 0-1 Knapsack Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-31, November.
    7. Altay, Nezih & Robinson Jr., Powell E. & Bretthauer, Kurt M., 2008. "Exact and heuristic solution approaches for the mixed integer setup knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(3), pages 598-609, November.
    8. Bian, Zheyong & Bai, Yun & Douglas, W. Scott & Maher, Ali & Liu, Xiang, 2022. "Multi-year planning for optimal navigation channel dredging and dredged material management," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    9. Sagnol, Guillaume & Barner, Christoph & Borndörfer, Ralf & Grima, Mickaël & Seeling, Matthes & Spies, Claudia & Wernecke, Klaus, 2018. "Robust allocation of operating rooms: A cutting plane approach to handle lognormal case durations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(2), pages 420-435.
    10. Leticia Vargas & Nicolas Jozefowiez & Sandra Ulrich Ngueveu, 2017. "A dynamic programming operator for tour location problems applied to the covering tour problem," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 53-80, February.
    11. Pisinger, David, 1995. "An expanding-core algorithm for the exact 0-1 knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 175-187, November.
    12. Zhenghua Long & Nahum Shimkin & Hailun Zhang & Jiheng Zhang, 2020. "Dynamic Scheduling of Multiclass Many-Server Queues with Abandonment: The Generalized cμ / h Rule," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 1128-1230, July.
    13. Michel, S. & Perrot, N. & Vanderbeck, F., 2009. "Knapsack problems with setups," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(3), pages 909-918, August.
    14. Mohammad Akbarpour & Scott Duke Kominers & Kevin Michael Li & Shengwu Li & Paul Milgrom, 2023. "Algorithmic Mechanism Design With Investment," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 91(6), pages 1969-2003, November.
    15. Peyman Khezr & Vijay Mohan & Lionel Page, 2024. "Strategic Bidding in Knapsack Auctions," Papers 2403.07928, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    16. Hugh Ward & Peter John, 2008. "A Spatial Model of Competitive Bidding for Government Grants: Why Efficiency Gains Are Limited," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 20(1), pages 47-66, January.
    17. Christopher Hojny & Tristan Gally & Oliver Habeck & Hendrik Lüthen & Frederic Matter & Marc E. Pfetsch & Andreas Schmitt, 2020. "Knapsack polytopes: a survey," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 292(1), pages 469-517, September.
    18. Richard W. Cottle, 2005. "George B. Dantzig: Operations Research Icon," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(6), pages 892-898, December.
    19. Joonyup Eun & Chang Sup Sung & Eun-Seok Kim, 2017. "Maximizing total job value on a single machine with job selection," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(9), pages 998-1005, September.
    20. Gasparini, Gaia & Brunelli, Matteo & Chiriac, Marius Dan, 2022. "Multi-period portfolio decision analysis: A case study in the infrastructure management sector," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 9(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:218:y:2012:i:3:p:838-846. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.