IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v202y2010i1p42-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A competitive and cooperative co-evolutionary approach to multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm design

Author

Listed:
  • Goh, C.K.
  • Tan, K.C.
  • Liu, D.S.
  • Chiam, S.C.

Abstract

Multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) is an optimization technique inspired by bird flocking, which has been steadily gaining attention from the research community because of its high convergence speed. On the other hand, in the face of increasing complexity and dimensionality of today's application coupled with its tendency of premature convergence due to the high convergence speeds, there is a need to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of MOPSO. In this paper a competitive and cooperative co-evolutionary approach is adapted for multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm design, which appears to have considerable potential for solving complex optimization problems by explicitly modeling the co-evolution of competing and cooperating species. The competitive and cooperative co-evolution model helps to produce the reasonable problem decompositions by exploiting any correlation, interdependency between components of the problem. The proposed competitive and cooperative co-evolutionary multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm (CCPSO) is validated through comparisons with existing state-of-the-art multi-objective algorithms using established benchmarks and metrics. Simulation results demonstrated that CCPSO shows competitive, if not better, performance as compared to the other algorithms.

Suggested Citation

  • Goh, C.K. & Tan, K.C. & Liu, D.S. & Chiam, S.C., 2010. "A competitive and cooperative co-evolutionary approach to multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(1), pages 42-54, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:202:y:2010:i:1:p:42-54
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(09)00316-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tan, K.C. & Cheong, C.Y. & Goh, C.K., 2007. "Solving multiobjective vehicle routing problem with stochastic demand via evolutionary computation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(2), pages 813-839, March.
    2. Neumann, Frank, 2007. "Expected runtimes of a simple evolutionary algorithm for the multi-objective minimum spanning tree problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(3), pages 1620-1629, September.
    3. Liu, D.S. & Tan, K.C. & Huang, S.Y. & Goh, C.K. & Ho, W.K., 2008. "On solving multiobjective bin packing problems using evolutionary particle swarm optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(2), pages 357-382, October.
    4. Tan, K.C. & Goh, C.K. & Mamun, A.A. & Ei, E.Z., 2008. "An evolutionary artificial immune system for multi-objective optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(2), pages 371-392, June.
    5. Tan, K.C. & Chew, Y.H. & Lee, L.H., 2006. "A hybrid multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for solving truck and trailer vehicle routing problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(3), pages 855-885, August.
    6. Lee, Loo Hay & Chew, Ek Peng & Teng, Suyan & Chen, Yankai, 2008. "Multi-objective simulation-based evolutionary algorithm for an aircraft spare parts allocation problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(2), pages 476-491, September.
    7. Ishibuchi, Hisao & Narukawa, Kaname & Tsukamoto, Noritaka & Nojima, Yusuke, 2008. "An empirical study on similarity-based mating for evolutionary multiobjective combinatorial optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(1), pages 57-75, July.
    8. Tseng, Chao-Tang & Liao, Ching-Jong, 2008. "A discrete particle swarm optimization for lot-streaming flowshop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 191(2), pages 360-373, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu, Ruochen & Li, Jianxia & fan, Jing & Mu, Caihong & Jiao, Licheng, 2017. "A coevolutionary technique based on multi-swarm particle swarm optimization for dynamic multi-objective optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 1028-1051.
    2. Labiba Noshin Asha & Arup Dey & Nita Yodo & Lucy G. Aragon, 2022. "Optimization Approaches for Multiple Conflicting Objectives in Sustainable Green Supply Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-24, October.
    3. Zhang, Yue & Zhang, Qi & Farnoosh, Arash & Chen, Siyuan & Li, Yan, 2019. "GIS-Based Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization of charging stations for electric vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 844-853.
    4. Kristina Yancey Spencer & Pavel V. Tsvetkov & Joshua J. Jarrell, 2019. "A greedy memetic algorithm for a multiobjective dynamic bin packing problem for storing cooling objects," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 1-45, February.
    5. Neungmatcha, Woraya, 2016. "Multi-objective particle swarm optimization for mechanical harvester route planning of sugarcane field operationsAuthor-Name: Sethanan, Kanchana," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(3), pages 969-984.
    6. Steven D. Silver, 2018. "Multivariate methodology for discriminating market segments in urban commuting," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 63-89, May.
    7. Qiang Yang & Yuanpeng Zhu & Xudong Gao & Dongdong Xu & Zhenyu Lu, 2022. "Elite Directed Particle Swarm Optimization with Historical Information for High-Dimensional Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-29, April.
    8. Sahinkoc, H. Mert & Bilge, Ümit, 2022. "A reference set based many-objective co-evolutionary algorithm with an application to the knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(2), pages 405-417.
    9. Lin, Qiuzhen & Li, Jianqiang & Du, Zhihua & Chen, Jianyong & Ming, Zhong, 2015. "A novel multi-objective particle swarm optimization with multiple search strategies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(3), pages 732-744.
    10. Suprava Chakraborty & Devaraj Elangovan & Padma Lakshmi Govindarajan & Mohamed F. ELnaggar & Mohammed M. Alrashed & Salah Kamel, 2022. "A Comprehensive Review of Path Planning for Agricultural Ground Robots," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Yujia & Yang, Yupu, 2010. "Particle swarm with equilibrium strategy of selection for multi-objective optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 187-197, January.
    2. Cho, Huidae & Kim, Dongkyun & Olivera, Francisco & Guikema, Seth D., 2011. "Enhanced speciation in particle swarm optimization for multi-modal problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 15-23, August.
    3. Tseng, Lin-Yu & Lin, Ya-Tai, 2009. "A hybrid genetic local search algorithm for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(1), pages 84-92, October.
    4. Feng, Bo & Jiang, Zhong-Zhong & Fan, Zhi-Ping & Fu, Na, 2010. "A method for member selection of cross-functional teams using the individual and collaborative performances," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(3), pages 652-661, June.
    5. Syberfeldt, Anna & Ng, Amos & John, Robert I. & Moore, Philip, 2010. "Evolutionary optimisation of noisy multi-objective problems using confidence-based dynamic resampling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(3), pages 533-544, August.
    6. Massimiliano Caramia & Francesca Guerriero, 2010. "A Milk Collection Problem with Incompatibility Constraints," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 40(2), pages 130-143, April.
    7. Yichen Lu & Chao Yang & Jun Yang, 2022. "A multi-objective humanitarian pickup and delivery vehicle routing problem with drones," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 291-353, December.
    8. Dengsheng Wu & Xiaoqian Zhu & Jie Wan & Chunbing Bao & Jianping Li, 2019. "A Multiobjective Optimization Approach for Selecting Risk Response Strategies of Software Project: From the Perspective of Risk Correlations," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(01), pages 339-364, January.
    9. Ann-Kathrin Rothenbächer & Michael Drexl & Stefan Irnich, 2018. "Branch-and-Price-and-Cut for the Truck-and-Trailer Routing Problem with Time Windows," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 1174-1190, October.
    10. Li, Yanzhi & Tao, Yi & Wang, Fan, 2009. "A compromised large-scale neighborhood search heuristic for capacitated air cargo loading planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(2), pages 553-560, December.
    11. Singh, Bindeshwar & Mukherjee, V. & Tiwari, Prabhakar, 2015. "A survey on impact assessment of DG and FACTS controllers in power systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 846-882.
    12. Joaquín Pacheco & Rafael Caballero & Manuel Laguna & Julián Molina, 2013. "Bi-Objective Bus Routing: An Application to School Buses in Rural Areas," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 397-411, August.
    13. Zajac, Sandra & Huber, Sandra, 2021. "Objectives and methods in multi-objective routing problems: a survey and classification scheme," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(1), pages 1-25.
    14. Jorge Oyola & Halvard Arntzen & David L. Woodruff, 2017. "The stochastic vehicle routing problem, a literature review, Part II: solution methods," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(4), pages 349-388, December.
    15. Lin, Rung-Chuan & Sir, Mustafa Y. & Pasupathy, Kalyan S., 2013. "Multi-objective simulation optimization using data envelopment analysis and genetic algorithm: Specific application to determining optimal resource levels in surgical services," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 881-892.
    16. Francis Sourd & Olivier Spanjaard, 2008. "A Multiobjective Branch-and-Bound Framework: Application to the Biobjective Spanning Tree Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 472-484, August.
    17. Huber, Sandra & Geiger, Martin Josef, 2017. "Order matters – A Variable Neighborhood Search for the Swap-Body Vehicle Routing Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(2), pages 419-445.
    18. C. Y. Lam, 2021. "Optimizing logistics routings in a network perspective of supply and demand nodes," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 29(1), pages 357-377, March.
    19. Bin, Wei & Qinke, Peng & Jing, Zhao & Xiao, Chen, 2012. "A binary particle swarm optimization algorithm inspired by multi-level organizational learning behavior," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(2), pages 224-233.
    20. Gabriel H Greve & Kenneth M Hopkinson & Gary B Lamont, 2018. "Evolutionary sensor allocation for the Space Surveillance Network," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 15(3), pages 303-322, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:202:y:2010:i:1:p:42-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.