IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecosta/v26y2023icp139-152.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New Statistic for Bayesian Hypothesis Testing

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Su
  • Walker, Stephen G.

Abstract

A new Bayesian–inspired statistic for hypothesis testing is proposed which compares two posterior distributions; the observed posterior and the expected posterior under the null model. The Kullback–Leibler divergence between the two posterior distributions yields a test statistic which can be interpreted as a penalized log–Bayes factor with the penalty term converging to a constant as the sample size increases. Hence, asymptotically, the statistic behaves as a Bayes factor. Viewed as a penalized Bayes factor, this approach solves the long standing issue of using improper priors with the Bayes factor, since only posterior summaries are needed for the new statistic. Further motivation for the new statistic is a minimal move from the Bayes factor which requires no tuning nor splitting of data into training and inference, and can use improper priors. Critical regions for the test can be assessed using frequentist notions of Type I error.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Su & Walker, Stephen G., 2023. "A New Statistic for Bayesian Hypothesis Testing," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 139-152.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecosta:v:26:y:2023:i:c:p:139-152
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecosta.2021.10.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452306221001246
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Contains open access articles

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecosta.2021.10.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dawid, A. Philip & Musio, Monica & Columbu, Silvia, 2017. "A note on Bayesian model selection for discrete data using proper scoring rules," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 101-106.
    2. repec:dau:papers:123456789/1908 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. José M. Bernardo & Raúl Rueda, 2002. "Bayesian Hypothesis Testing: a Reference Approach," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 70(3), pages 351-372, December.
    4. Stephane Shao & Pierre E. Jacob & Jie Ding & Vahid Tarokh, 2019. "Bayesian Model Comparison with the Hyvärinen Score: Computation and Consistency," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 114(528), pages 1826-1837, October.
    5. Stephen Walker & Nils Lid Hjort, 2001. "On Bayesian consistency," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(4), pages 811-821.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luo, Yu & Graham, Daniel J. & McCoy, Emma J., 2023. "Semiparametric Bayesian doubly robust causal estimation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117944, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Vidal, Ignacio & Iglesias, Pilar, 2008. "Comparison between a measurement error model and a linear model without measurement error," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 92-102, September.
    3. Tsionas, Mike G., 2021. "Comparison of stochastic frontier models using the Hyvärinen factor," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    4. Valen E. Johnson & David Rossell, 2010. "On the use of non‐local prior densities in Bayesian hypothesis tests," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 72(2), pages 143-170, March.
    5. D. Fouskakis, 2019. "Priors via imaginary training samples of sufficient statistics for objective Bayesian hypothesis testing," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 77(3), pages 179-199, December.
    6. Ho, Chi-san & Damien, Paul & Walker, Stephen, 2017. "Bayesian mode regression using mixtures of triangular densities," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 197(2), pages 273-283.
    7. Li, Yong & Zeng, Tao & Yu, Jun, 2014. "A new approach to Bayesian hypothesis testing," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 178(P3), pages 602-612.
    8. Guido Consonni & Eduardo Gutiérrez-Peña & Piero Veronese, 2008. "Compatible priors for Bayesian model comparison with an application to the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium model," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 17(3), pages 585-605, November.
    9. Cerqueti, Roy & Falbo, Paolo & Pelizzari, Cristian, 2017. "Relevant states and memory in Markov chain bootstrapping and simulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(1), pages 163-177.
    10. C Rohrbeck & D A Costain & A Frigessi, 2018. "Bayesian spatial monotonic multiple regression," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 105(3), pages 691-707.
    11. Li, Yong & Liu, Xiao-Bin & Yu, Jun, 2015. "A Bayesian chi-squared test for hypothesis testing," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 189(1), pages 54-69.
    12. Jeremy Fouliard & Michael Howell & Hélène Rey & Vania Stavrakeva, 2020. "Answering the Queen: Machine Learning and Financial Crises," NBER Working Papers 28302, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Nott, David J. & Leng, Chenlei, 2010. "Bayesian projection approaches to variable selection in generalized linear models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 3227-3241, December.
    14. Shively, Thomas S. & Walker, Stephen G. & Damien, Paul, 2011. "Nonparametric function estimation subject to monotonicity, convexity and other shape constraints," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 161(2), pages 166-181, April.
    15. José M. Bernardo, 2003. "Discussion," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 71(2), pages 307-314, August.
    16. Jack Jewson & David Rossell, 2022. "General Bayesian loss function selection and the use of improper models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(5), pages 1640-1665, November.
    17. Elías Moreno & Carmen Martínez & Francisco–José Vázquez–Polo, 2021. "Objective Bayesian model choice for non-nested families: the case of the Poisson and the negative binomial," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 30(1), pages 255-273, March.
    18. Thomas S. Shively & Thomas W. Sager & Stephen G. Walker, 2009. "A Bayesian approach to non‐parametric monotone function estimation," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(1), pages 159-175, January.
    19. M. J. Bayarri & G. García‐Donato, 2008. "Generalization of Jeffreys divergence‐based priors for Bayesian hypothesis testing," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(5), pages 981-1003, November.
    20. Li, Yong & Yu, Jun, 2012. "Bayesian hypothesis testing in latent variable models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 166(2), pages 237-246.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecosta:v:26:y:2023:i:c:p:139-152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/econometrics-and-statistics .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.