IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecoser/v64y2023ics2212041623000530.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecosystem services footprint of international trade: Economic value of ecosystem services lost due to crop production

Author

Listed:
  • Vačkářová, Davina
  • Medková, Helena
  • Krpec, Petr
  • Weinzettel, Jan

Abstract

Agricultural activities utilize provisioning ecosystem services while degrading nature’s contributions to people of natural ecosystems. These impacts are partly driven by international trade and consumption abroad. The objective of this Communication is to introduce the concept of the ecosystem services footprint and provide a pilot calculation of the economic value of ecosystem services lost due to land conversion and production of crops, which are either directly traded internationally or enter supply chains of international trade and are induced by final demand abroad. We report the ecosystem services loss footprint for 49 countries and world regions based on a multi-regional input–output analysis. We found that ecosystem services loss due to crop production for international trade is valued at $5.1 trillion per year. Consumption in China, United States and Middle East induce the highest absolute loss of value of ecosystem services. The main exporters include Asia and Pacific, Indonesia and Africa. The largest trade flow was identified between the Asia and Pacific region and Western Europe with an embodied value of ecosystem services loss of $397 billion per year. Bringing to light the monetary value of ecosystem services lost due to international trade can stimulate and contribute to the design of strategies to reduce the impact of consumption and thus to lightening our footprint on natural ecosystems.

Suggested Citation

  • Vačkářová, Davina & Medková, Helena & Krpec, Petr & Weinzettel, Jan, 2023. "Ecosystem services footprint of international trade: Economic value of ecosystem services lost due to crop production," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:64:y:2023:i:c:s2212041623000530
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2023.101560
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041623000530
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecoser.2023.101560?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Lenzen & D. Moran & K. Kanemoto & B. Foran & L. Lobefaro & A. Geschke, 2012. "International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations," Nature, Nature, vol. 486(7401), pages 109-112, June.
    2. Tramberend, Sylvia & Fischer, Günther & Bruckner, Martin & van Velthuizen, Harrij, 2019. "Our Common Cropland: Quantifying Global Agricultural Land Use from a Consumption Perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 332-341.
    3. de Groot, Rudolf & Brander, Luke & van der Ploeg, Sander & Costanza, Robert & Bernard, Florence & Braat, Leon & Christie, Mike & Crossman, Neville & Ghermandi, Andrea & Hein, Lars & Hussain, Salman & , 2012. "Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 50-61.
    4. Luis R Carrasco & Edward L Webb & William S Symes & Lian P Koh & Navjot S Sodhi, 2017. "Global economic trade-offs between wild nature and tropical agriculture," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, July.
    5. Chaudhary, Abhishek & Brooks, Thomas M., 2019. "National Consumption and Global Trade Impacts on Biodiversity," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 178-187.
    6. Arnold Tukker & Richard Wood & Stefan Giljum, 2018. "Relevance of Global Multi Regional Input Output Databases for Global Environmental Policy: Experiences with EXIOBASE 3," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(3), pages 482-484, June.
    7. Schröter, Matthias & Koellner, Thomas & Alkemade, Rob & Arnhold, Sebastian & Bagstad, Kenneth J. & Erb, Karl-Heinz & Frank, Karin & Kastner, Thomas & Kissinger, Meidad & Liu, Jianguo & López-Hoffman, , 2018. "Interregional flows of ecosystem services: Concepts, typology and four cases," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PB), pages 231-241.
    8. Thomas Guillaume & Martyna M. Kotowska & Dietrich Hertel & Alexander Knohl & Valentyna Krashevska & Kukuh Murtilaksono & Stefan Scheu & Yakov Kuzyakov, 2018. "Carbon costs and benefits of Indonesian rainforest conversion to plantations," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, December.
    9. Fenta, Ayele Almaw & Tsunekawa, Atsushi & Haregeweyn, Nigussie & Tsubo, Mitsuru & Yasuda, Hiroshi & Shimizu, Katsuyuki & Kawai, Takayuki & Ebabu, Kindiye & Berihun, Mulatu Liyew & Sultan, Dagnenet & B, 2020. "Cropland expansion outweighs the monetary effect of declining natural vegetation on ecosystem services in sub-Saharan Africa," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    10. Jan Weinzettel, 2022. "Aggregation error of the material footprint: the case of the EU," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3), pages 320-342, July.
    11. Barbier, Edward B., 2020. "Long run agricultural land expansion, booms and busts," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    12. Marco Springmann & Michael Clark & Daniel Mason-D’Croz & Keith Wiebe & Benjamin Leon Bodirsky & Luis Lassaletta & Wim Vries & Sonja J. Vermeulen & Mario Herrero & Kimberly M. Carlson & Malin Jonell & , 2018. "Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits," Nature, Nature, vol. 562(7728), pages 519-525, October.
    13. Arnold Tukker & Richard Wood & Sarah Schmidt, 2020. "Towards accepted procedures for calculating international consumption-based carbon accounts," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(S1), pages 90-106, April.
    14. Marc D. Davidson, 2017. "Equity and the Conservation of Global Ecosystem Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-15, February.
    15. Stefan Schmidt & Ameur M Manceur & Ralf Seppelt, 2016. "Uncertainty of Monetary Valued Ecosystem Services – Value Transfer Functions for Global Mapping," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-22, March.
    16. Jan Weinzettel & Dava Vačkářů & Helena Medková, 2019. "Potential net primary production footprint of agriculture: A global trade analysis," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(5), pages 1133-1142, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eivind Lekve Bjelle & Johannes Többen & Konstantin Stadler & Thomas Kastner & Michaela C. Theurl & Karl-Heinz Erb & Kjartan-Steen Olsen & Kirsten S. Wiebe & Richard Wood, 2020. "Adding country resolution to EXIOBASE: impacts on land use embodied in trade," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 9(1), pages 1-25, December.
    2. Bruckner, Martin & Wood, Richard & Moran, Daniel & Kuschnig, Nikolas & Wieland, Hanspeter & Maus, Victor & Börner, Jan, 2019. "FABIO - The Construction of the Food and Agriculture Biomass Input-Output Model," Ecological Economic Papers 27, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    3. Luo, Xiangyu & Jiang, Peng & Yang, Jingyi & Jin, Jing & Yang, Jun, 2021. "Simulating PM2.5 removal in an urban ecosystem based on the social-ecological model framework," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    4. Chuai, Xiaowei & Gao, Runyi & Huang, Xianjin & Lu, Qinli & Zhao, Rongqin, 2021. "The embodied flow of built-up land in China's interregional trade and its implications for regional carbon balance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    5. Correa, Alicia & Forero, Jorge & Marco Renau, Jorge & Lizarazo, Ivan & Mulligan, Mark & Codato, Daniele, 2023. "Advancing spatial decision-making in a transboundary catchment through multidimensional ecosystem services assessment," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    6. Mekuria, Wolde & Gedle, Assefa & Tesfaye, Yitna & Phimister, Euan, 2023. "Implications of changes in land use for ecosystem service values of two highly eroded watersheds in Lake Abaya Chamo sub-basin, Ethiopia," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    7. Andrew J Tanentzap, 2017. "The costs of saving nature: Does it make “cents”?," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-7, July.
    8. Costanza, Robert & de Groot, Rudolf & Braat, Leon & Kubiszewski, Ida & Fioramonti, Lorenzo & Sutton, Paul & Farber, Steve & Grasso, Monica, 2017. "Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PA), pages 1-16.
    9. Jiang, Wei & Wu, Tong & Fu, Bojie, 2021. "The value of ecosystem services in China: A systematic review for twenty years," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    10. Kubiszewski, Ida & Costanza, Robert & Anderson, Sharolyn & Sutton, Paul, 2017. "The future value of ecosystem services: Global scenarios and national implications," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(PA), pages 289-301.
    11. Xiaona Guo & Ruishan Chen & Qiang Li & Michael E. Meadows, 2021. "Achieving Win–Win Solutions in Telecoupled Human–Land Systems," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.
    12. Aschonitis, V.G. & Gaglio, M. & Castaldelli, G. & Fano, E.A., 2016. "Criticism on elasticity-sensitivity coefficient for assessing the robustness and sensitivity of ecosystem services values," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 66-68.
    13. Schild, Johanna E.M. & Vermaat, Jan E. & de Groot, Rudolf S. & Quatrini, Simone & van Bodegom, Peter M., 2018. "A global meta-analysis on the monetary valuation of dryland ecosystem services: The role of socio-economic, environmental and methodological indicators," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 32(PA), pages 78-89.
    14. Shaikh, M. Abdullah & Hadjikakou, Michalis & Geyik, Ozge & Bryan, Brett A., 2024. "Assessing global agri-food system exceedance of national cropland limits for linking responsible consumption and production under SDG 12," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    15. Holland, Robert A. & Beaumont, Nicola & Hooper, Tara & Austen, Melanie & Gross, Robert J.K. & Heptonstall, Philip J. & Ketsopoulou, Ioanna & Winskel, Mark & Watson, Jim & Taylor, Gail, 2018. "Incorporating ecosystem services into the design of future energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 812-822.
    16. Chotte, Jean-Luc & Orr, Barron Joseph, 2021. "Mitigating “displaced” land degradation and the risk of spillover through the decommoditization of land products," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    17. Klapper, Johanna & Schröter, Matthias, 2021. "Interregional flows of multiple ecosystem services through global trade in wild species," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    18. Paradis, Emmanuel, 2021. "Forest gains and losses in Southeast Asia over 27 years: The slow convergence towards reforestation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    19. Irene Blanco-Gutiérrez & Consuelo Varela-Ortega & Rhys Manners, 2020. "Evaluating Animal-Based Foods and Plant-Based Alternatives Using Multi-Criteria and SWOT Analyses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-26, October.
    20. Vermunt, D.A. & Wojtynia, N. & Hekkert, M.P. & Van Dijk, J. & Verburg, R. & Verweij, P.A. & Wassen, M. & Runhaar, H., 2022. "Five mechanisms blocking the transition towards ‘nature-inclusive’ agriculture: A systemic analysis of Dutch dairy farming," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:64:y:2023:i:c:s2212041623000530. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecosystem-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.