IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecoser/v27y2017ipbp224-231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reducing landscape restoration costs: Feasibility of generating electricity from invasive alien plant biomass on the Agulhas Plain, South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Stafford, William
  • Blignaut, James

Abstract

South Africa has embarked on a large-scale government programme to control invasive alien plants (IAPs). However, to date, very little cost recovery has occurred through the development of value adding industries and the sale of various wood products and bioenergy. Using the Agulhas Plain as a case study, we assess the feasibility of using IAP biomass in modular 250kWe wood gasifiers to produce electricity with biochar as a co-product. There is sufficient IAP biomass available over a 15 year time-frame for the installation of 2.6MWe electricity generation capacity, and the financial feasibility is attractive (net present value US$1.35 million for wood gasifiers, compared to -US$2.1 million for diesel-fuelled generators). However, the feasibility of the value added industry depends on sharing the cost for IAP biomass supply between the bioenergy entrepreneur (US$11.01/green tonne) and government (US$17.56/green tonne). A cost-sharing business model and public-private partnerships will be needed to develop value adding industries, control IAPs and reduce the costs of landscape restoration. These value adding industries will also deliver various other socio-economic benefits; including: increasing water availability, reducing carbon emissions, providing jobs, developing skills, stimulating rural development, and helping to steer South Africa towards a more sustainable development path.

Suggested Citation

  • Stafford, William & Blignaut, James, 2017. "Reducing landscape restoration costs: Feasibility of generating electricity from invasive alien plant biomass on the Agulhas Plain, South Africa," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 27(PB), pages 224-231.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:27:y:2017:i:pb:p:224-231
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.04.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041617302802
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.04.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lydia Fryda & Rianne Visser, 2015. "Biochar for Soil Improvement: Evaluation of Biochar from Gasification and Slow Pyrolysis," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-40, November.
    2. B.W. van Wilgen & D.M. Richardson & D.C. Le Maitre & C. Marais & D. Magadlela, 2001. "The Economic Consequences of Alien Plant Invasions: Examples of Impacts and Approaches to Sustainable Management in South Africa," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 145-168, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Turpie, J.K. & Marais, C. & Blignaut, J.N., 2008. "The working for water programme: Evolution of a payments for ecosystem services mechanism that addresses both poverty and ecosystem service delivery in South Africa," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(4), pages 788-798, May.
    2. Lehrer, David & Becker, Nir & Bar, Pua, 2010. "The economic impact of the invasion of Acacia saligna in Israel," MPRA Paper 33954, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Rauschmayer, Felix, 2003. "Integrated assessment of biological invasions," UFZ Discussion Papers 1/2003, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    4. Kgalalelo Tshimologo Annie Setshedi & Solomon Wakshom Newete, 2020. "The Impact of Exotic Tamarix Species on Riparian Plant Biodiversity," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Humphrey, Luke & Fraser, Gavin & Martin, Grant, 2019. "The Economic Implications of Robinia pseudoacacia L. (black locust) on Agricultural Production in South Africa," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 58(2), April.
    6. Enrico Catizzone & Corradino Sposato & Assunta Romanelli & Donatella Barisano & Giacinto Cornacchia & Luigi Marsico & Daniela Cozza & Massimo Migliori, 2021. "Purification of Wastewater from Biomass-Derived Syngas Scrubber Using Biochar and Activated Carbons," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-20, April.
    7. Fraser, Gavin C.G., 2010. "How the leopard has changed its spots: past dynamics and future opportunities," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 49(1), pages 1-16, March.
    8. Helanya Fourie & Martin de Wit & Albert van der Merwe, 2011. "The role and value of water in natural capital restoration on the Agulhas Plain," Working Papers 03/2011, Stellenbosch University, Department of Economics.
    9. Ali Abdelaal & Vittoria Benedetti & Audrey Villot & Francesco Patuzzi & Claire Gerente & Marco Baratieri, 2023. "Innovative Pathways for the Valorization of Biomass Gasification Char: A Systematic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-24, May.
    10. Hernández, J.J. & Saffe, A. & Collado, R. & Monedero, E., 2020. "Recirculation of char from biomass gasification: Effects on gasifier performance and end-char properties," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 806-813.
    11. Agus Haryanto & Wahyu Hidayat & Udin Hasanudin & Dewi Agustina Iryani & Sangdo Kim & Sihyun Lee & Jiho Yoo, 2021. "Valorization of Indonesian Wood Wastes through Pyrolysis: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-25, March.
    12. Stafford, William & Birch, Catherine & Etter, Hannes & Blanchard, Ryan & Mudavanhu, Shepherd & Angelstam, Per & Blignaut, James & Ferreira, Louwrens & Marais, Christo, 2017. "The economics of landscape restoration: Benefits of controlling bush encroachment and invasive plant species in South Africa and Namibia," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 27(PB), pages 193-202.
    13. Long, Jimiao & Deng, Lei & Che, Defu, 2020. "Analysis on organic compounds in water leachate from biomass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 1070-1078.
    14. Obianuju P. Ilo & Mulala D. Simatele & S’phumelele L. Nkomo & Ntandoyenkosi M. Mkhize & Nagendra G. Prabhu, 2020. "The Benefits of Water Hyacinth ( Eichhornia crassipes ) for Southern Africa: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-20, November.
    15. Theodora Bousdra & Sotiria G. Papadimou & Evangelia E. Golia, 2023. "The Use of biochar in the Remediation of Pb , Cd , and Cu -Contaminated Soils. The Impact of biochar Feedstock and Preparation Conditions on Its Remediation Capacity," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-20, January.
    16. Khuliso Emmanuel Ravhuhali & Humbelani Silas Mudau & Bethwell Moyo & Onke Hawu & Ntokozo Happy Msiza, 2021. "Prosopis Species—An Invasive Species and a Potential Source of Browse for Livestock in Semi-Arid Areas of South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-13, July.
    17. Lemay, A. & Meissner, H. & Koop, A., 2009. "Plant Propagative Material As A Pathway For The Movement Of Exotic Plant Pests Into And Within The Greater Caribbean Region," 45th Annual Meeting, July 12-17, 2009, Frigate Bay, St. Kitts and Nevis 256350, Caribbean Food Crops Society.
    18. Bonolo Anita Pududu & Hanna-Andrea Rother, 2021. "Whose Jurisdiction Is Home Contamination? Para-Occupational ‘Take-Home’ Herbicide Residue Exposure Risks among Forestry Workers’ Families in South Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-16, September.
    19. Born, Wanda & Rauschmayer, Felix & Brauer, Ingo, 2005. "Economic evaluation of biological invasions--a survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 321-336, November.
    20. Inés López-Cano & María L. Cayuela & Claudio Mondini & Chibi A. Takaya & Andrew B. Ross & Miguel A. Sánchez-Monedero, 2018. "Suitability of Different Agricultural and Urban Organic Wastes as Feedstocks for the Production of Biochar—Part 1: Physicochemical Characterisation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:27:y:2017:i:pb:p:224-231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecosystem-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.