IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v450y2021ics0304380021001320.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling the organic carbon dynamics in long-term fertilizer experiments of India using the Rothamsted carbon model

Author

Listed:
  • Jha, Pramod
  • Lakaria, Brij Lal
  • Vishwakarma, AK
  • Wanjari, RH
  • Mohanty, M
  • Sinha, Nishant K
  • Somasundaram, J
  • Dheri, GS
  • Dwivedi, AK
  • Sharma, Raj Paul
  • Singh, Muneshwar
  • Dalal, RC
  • Biswas, AK
  • Patra, AK
  • Chaudhari, SK

Abstract

Soil organic carbon (SOC) turnover simulation models have been widely used to predict SOC changes with changing climatic and management conditions. Rothamsted carbon model, RothC 26.3 is one of the most widely used C turnover simulation model, however, this model has not been extensively tested under the Indian conditions. Model prediction accuracy depends upon correct initialization procedure as wrong initialization can simulate the data incorrectly. We initialised the RothC model using the data set from three long-term fertilizer experiments (LTFE) of India. The model was parameterized for the pre cultivated soils of the three major soil orders (Vertisol, Alfisol and Inceptisol) of India for the treatments of nil fertilization (control), balanced fertilization (NPK) and NPK+ Farm Yard Manure (FYM). The RothC was successfully initialized (forward mode) by iteratively adjusting the C input and inert organic matter (IOM) stock of soil at steady state. The agreement between the modelled and measured data of SOC stocks across three different soil types was satisfactory, with root mean square error (RMSE) for LTFE treatments ranged from 2 to 14%. The results of the RothC simulations demonstrated that NPK and NPK+FYM increased SOC stocks at the 0–30 cm soil depth by 12–61 and 30–107%, respectively, over the initial value at the three sites. The SOC stocks reached steady state for the treatments of NPK and NPK+FYM between 48 and 95 and 68 to 116 years, respectively, in three different soil types. Therefore, the RothC model can successfully predict C dynamics under Indian conditions provided initialization and parametrization of the model is accurate.

Suggested Citation

  • Jha, Pramod & Lakaria, Brij Lal & Vishwakarma, AK & Wanjari, RH & Mohanty, M & Sinha, Nishant K & Somasundaram, J & Dheri, GS & Dwivedi, AK & Sharma, Raj Paul & Singh, Muneshwar & Dalal, RC & Biswas, , 2021. "Modeling the organic carbon dynamics in long-term fertilizer experiments of India using the Rothamsted carbon model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 450(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:450:y:2021:i:c:s0304380021001320
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109562
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380021001320
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109562?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McCown, R. L. & Hammer, G. L. & Hargreaves, J. N. G. & Holzworth, D. P. & Freebairn, D. M., 1996. "APSIM: a novel software system for model development, model testing and simulation in agricultural systems research," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 255-271.
    2. Mishra, Gaurav & Jangir, Abhishek & Francaviglia, Rosa, 2019. "Modeling soil organic carbon dynamics under shifting cultivation and forests using Rothc model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 396(C), pages 33-41.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yunfeng Li & Quanqing Feng & Dongwei Li & Mingfa Li & Huifeng Ning & Qisheng Han & Abdoul Kader Mounkaila Hamani & Yang Gao & Jingsheng Sun, 2022. "Water-Salt Thresholds of Cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) under Film Drip Irrigation in Arid Saline-Alkali Area," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Qureshi, Muhammad Ejaz & Arunakumaren, J. & Bajracharya, K. & Wegener, Malcolm K. & Qureshi, S.E. & Bristow, Keith L., 2002. "Economic and environmental impacts of groundwater management scenarios in Burdekin Delta," 2002 Conference (46th), February 13-15, 2002, Canberra, Australia 125148, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    3. Negm, L.M. & Youssef, M.A. & Skaggs, R.W. & Chescheir, G.M. & Jones, J., 2014. "DRAINMOD–DSSAT model for simulating hydrology, soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics, and crop growth for drained crop land," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 30-45.
    4. Jing Wang & Feng Fang & Qiang Zhang & Jinsong Wang & Yubi Yao & Wei Wang, 2016. "Risk evaluation of agricultural disaster impacts on food production in southern China by probability density method," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 83(3), pages 1605-1634, September.
    5. Jagadish Padhiary & Kanhu Charan Patra & Sonam Sandeep Dash, 2022. "A Novel Approach to Identify the Characteristics of Drought under Future Climate Change Scenario," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(13), pages 5163-5189, October.
    6. Feike, Til & Henseler, Martin, 2017. "Multiple Policy Instruments for Sustainable Water Management in Crop Production - A Modeling Study for the Chinese Aksu-Tarim Region," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 42-54.
    7. Unknown, 1997. "A New Soil Conservation Methodology and Application to Cropping Systems in Tropical Steeplands: A comparative synthesis of results obtained in ACIAR Project PN 9201," Technical Reports 113906, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
    8. Meinke, H. & Baethgen, W. E. & Carberry, P. S. & Donatelli, M. & Hammer, G. L. & Selvaraju, R. & Stockle, C. O., 2001. "Increasing profits and reducing risks in crop production using participatory systems simulation approaches," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 70(2-3), pages 493-513.
    9. Probert, M. E. & Dimes, J. P. & Keating, B. A. & Dalal, R. C. & Strong, W. M., 1998. "APSIM's water and nitrogen modules and simulation of the dynamics of water and nitrogen in fallow systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 1-28, January.
    10. Cabelguenne, M. & Debaeke, P. & Bouniols, A., 1999. "EPICphase, a version of the EPIC model simulating the effects of water and nitrogen stress on biomass and yield, taking account of developmental stages: validation on maize, sunflower, sorghum, soybea," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 175-196, June.
    11. Chauhdary, Junaid Nawaz & Li, Hong & Akbar, Nadeem & Javaid, Maria & Rizwan, Muhammad & Akhlaq, Muhammad, 2024. "Evaluating corn production under different plant spacings through integrated modeling approach and simulating its future response under climate change scenarios," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    12. Anwar, Muhuddin Rajin & Liu, De Li & Farquharson, Robert & Macadam, Ian & Abadi, Amir & Finlayson, John & Wang, Bin & Ramilan, Thiagarajah, 2015. "Climate change impacts on phenology and yields of five broadacre crops at four climatologically distinct locations in Australia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 133-144.
    13. Graham R. Marshall & Kevin A. Parton & G.L. Hammer, 1996. "Risk Attitude, Planting Conditions And The Value Of Seasonal Forecasts To A Dryland Wheat Grower," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 40(3), pages 211-233, December.
    14. Thomas, N., 2021. "Alternative Crop Management Methods to Increase Crop Productivity and Farmer Utility," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315042, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Kadigi, Ibrahim L. & Richardson, James W. & Mutabazi, Khamaldin D. & Philip, Damas & Mourice, Sixbert K. & Mbungu, Winfred & Bizimana, Jean-Claude & Sieber, Stefan, 2020. "The effect of nitrogen-fertilizer and optimal plant population on the profitability of maize plots in the Wami River sub-basin, Tanzania: A bio-economic simulation approach," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    16. Gao, Ya & Sun, Chen & Ramos, Tiago B. & Huo, Zailin & Huang, Guanhua & Xu, Xu, 2023. "Modeling nitrogen dynamics and biomass production in rice paddy fields of cold regions with the ORYZA-N model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 475(C).
    17. Singh, Shailendra & Bhattarai, Rabin & Negm, Lamyaa M. & Youssef, Mohamed A. & Pittelkow, Cameron M., 2020. "Evaluation of nitrogen loss reduction strategies using DRAINMOD-DSSAT in east-central Illinois," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    18. Carberry, P. S. & Hochman, Z. & McCown, R. L. & Dalgliesh, N. P. & Foale, M. A. & Poulton, P. L. & Hargreaves, J. N. G. & Hargreaves, D. M. G. & Cawthray, S. & Hillcoat, N. & Robertson, M. J., 2002. "The FARMSCAPE approach to decision support: farmers', advisers', researchers' monitoring, simulation, communication and performance evaluation," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 141-177, October.
    19. Farquharson, Robert J. & Cacho, Oscar J. & Mullen, John D., 2005. "An economic approach to soil fertility management for wheat production in New South Wales and Queensland," 2005 Conference (49th), February 9-11, 2005, Coff's Harbour, Australia 137866, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    20. Chauhan, Yashvir S., 2010. "Potential productivity and water requirements of maize-peanut rotations in Australian semi-arid tropical environments--A crop simulation study," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(3), pages 457-464, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:450:y:2021:i:c:s0304380021001320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.