IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v431y2020ics0304380020302106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Embracing multimodal optimization to enhance Dynamic Energy Budget parameterization

Author

Listed:
  • Filgueira, Ramón
  • Chica, Manuel
  • Palacios, Juan José
  • Strohmeier, Tore
  • Lavaud, Romain
  • Agüera, Antonio
  • Damas, Sergio
  • Strand, Øivind

Abstract

Parameterization is one of the most challenging steps in the construction of individual-based models, and it is particularly relevant for the case of Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) theory given that DEB parameters are mapped to a multimodal fitness landscape. This multimodal fitness landscape could correspond to parameterizations that provide the right outcome for the wrong reasons. Given the lack of available data to directly parameterize some aspects of DEB models, mathematical tools are becoming the state-of-the-art approach to estimate or refine unknown parameters. The aim of this study is to explore the use of a novel mathematical algorithm that recognizes the multimodal nature of the fitness landscape as a way to provide alternative equally good parameterizations for DEB models. The Multimodal Optimization for Model CAlibration (MOMCA) framework was used to calibrate a DEB model for the blue mussel Mytilus edulis using datasets that included environmental information, growth, and physiological rates. The inclusion of physiological rates, an uncommon approach in DEB parameterization, allowed for constraining the range of solutions, and reducing parameter uncertainty. The application of the MOMCA framework allowed for the identification of the energy acquisition sub-model as one of the top priorities for improving the mechanistic understanding of mussel bioenergetics, and consequently for enhancing model performance. The MOMCA framework could complement the standard procedures to estimate DEB parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Filgueira, Ramón & Chica, Manuel & Palacios, Juan José & Strohmeier, Tore & Lavaud, Romain & Agüera, Antonio & Damas, Sergio & Strand, Øivind, 2020. "Embracing multimodal optimization to enhance Dynamic Energy Budget parameterization," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 431(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:431:y:2020:i:c:s0304380020302106
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380020302106
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109139?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saleh, Mohamed & Oliva, Rogelio & Kampmann, Christian Erik & Davidsen, Pål I., 2010. "A comprehensive analytical approach for policy analysis of system dynamics models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(3), pages 673-683, June.
    2. Saraiva, S. & van der Meer, J. & Kooijman, S.A.L.M. & Sousa, T., 2011. "Modelling feeding processes in bivalves: A mechanistic approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 514-523.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu, Shiwei & Wei, Yi-ming, 2012. "Prediction of China's coal production-environmental pollution based on a hybrid genetic algorithm-system dynamics model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 521-529.
    2. Steven E. Wallis, 2021. "Understanding and improving the usefulness of conceptual systems: An Integrative Propositional Analysis‐based perspective on levels of structure and emergence," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 426-447, August.
    3. Mert Edali, 2022. "Pattern‐oriented analysis of system dynamics models via random forests," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 38(2), pages 135-166, April.
    4. Navid Ghaffarzadegan & Richard C. Larson, 2018. "SD meets OR: a new synergy to address policy problems," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 34(1-2), pages 327-353, January.
    5. Sujit De & Shib Sana, 2015. "Backlogging EOQ model for promotional effort and selling price sensitive demand- an intuitionistic fuzzy approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 233(1), pages 57-76, October.
    6. Mert Edali & Gönenç Yücel, 2020. "Analysis of an individual‐based influenza epidemic model using random forest metamodels and adaptive sequential sampling," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 936-958, November.
    7. William Schoenberg & John Hayward & Robert Eberlein, 2023. "Improving Loops that Matter," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 39(2), pages 140-151, April.
    8. Goh, H.H. & Lee, S.W. & Chua, Q.S. & Goh, K.C. & Kok, B.C. & Teo, K.T.K., 2014. "Renewable energy project: Project management, challenges and risk," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 917-932.
    9. Spiegler, Virginia L.M. & Naim, Mohamed M., 2017. "Investigating sustained oscillations in nonlinear production and inventory control models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(2), pages 572-583.
    10. Bowei Xu & Junjun Li & Yongsheng Yang & Huafeng Wu & Octavian Postolache, 2019. "Model and Resilience Analysis for Handling Chain Systems in Container Ports," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-12, July.
    11. Mustafa Hekimoğlu & Yaman Barlas & Luis Luna-Reyes, 2016. "Sensitivity analysis for models with multiple behavior modes: a method based on behavior pattern measures," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 32(3-4), pages 332-362, July.
    12. Lavaud, Romain & La Peyre, Megan K. & Casas, Sandra M. & Bacher, Cédric & La Peyre, Jérôme F., 2017. "Integrating the effects of salinity on the physiology of the eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica, in the northern Gulf of Mexico through a Dynamic Energy Budget model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 363(C), pages 221-233.
    13. Guomei Fu & Jiafu Tang, 2024. "Simulation and Regulation of High-Quality Economic Development Based on System Dynamics and DPSIR Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-18, July.
    14. Rogelio Oliva, 2020. "On structural dominance analysis," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 36(1), pages 8-28, January.
    15. Dace, Elina & Bazbauers, Gatis & Berzina, Alise & Davidsen, Pål I., 2014. "System dynamics model for analyzing effects of eco-design policy on packaging waste management system," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 175-190.
    16. Kennedy, Deanna M. & Sommer, S. Amy & Nguyen, Phuong Anh, 2017. "Optimizing multi-team system behaviors: Insights from modeling team communication," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 264-278.
    17. Hang, Wen & Li, Xuhong, 2010. "Application of system dynamics for evaluating truck weight regulations," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 240-250, August.
    18. Erling Moxnes & Pål I. Davidsen, 2016. "Intuitive understanding of steady-state and transient behaviors," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 32(2), pages 128-153, April.
    19. Montagnes, David J.S. & Fenton, Andy, 2012. "Prey-abundance affects zooplankton assimilation efficiency and the outcome of biogeochemical models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 243(C), pages 1-7.
    20. William Schoenberg & Pål Davidsen & Robert Eberlein, 2020. "Understanding model behavior using the Loops that Matter method," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 36(2), pages 158-190, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:431:y:2020:i:c:s0304380020302106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.